Philosophy Now Forum

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:07 am

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:03 am I have quoted this many times re What is Philosophical Realism and opened numerous threads on the subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism

Why Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?t=40167

You on the other had not made a single reference to support your Indirect Realism and Philosophical Realism.
Are you sure you know what you are talking about philosophically.

Yes, you never even understood what p-realism means. You read the wiki page but can't comprehend it.

You are running out of argument, so going on vague and blur mode as a form of escapism.

I'm not running out of arguments, fact is you never had any actual arguments.

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:16 am

Atla wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:07 am

Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sat Dec 21, 2024 10:03 am I have quoted this many times re What is Philosophical Realism and opened numerous threads on the subject.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philosophical_realism

Why Philosophical Realism is Illusory
viewtopic.php?t=40167

You on the other had not made a single reference to support your Indirect Realism and Philosophical Realism.
Are you sure you know what you are talking about philosophically.

Yes, you never even understood what p-realism means. You read the wiki page but can't comprehend it.

You are running out of argument, so going on vague and blur mode as a form of escapism.

I'm not running out of arguments, fact is you never had any actual arguments.

Blabbering again.
For philosophy sake, the onus is on you to counter and present your views if you think mine is wrong.
If you don't it is evident you are losing the argument.