Re: How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn't Locally Real
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2024 5:01 pm
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
word salad, a total lack of nuanceVeritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:47 amAgain you are ignorant.
The reality, fact, truth and objectivity of the Big Bang is only valid within the embodied human-based science-physics-cosmological FSRC.
You cannot state the Big Bang Theory without explicitly and implicitly grounding it upon the FSRC. You cannot claim Big Bang happened because my mother, father said so!
Since the FSRC is embodied and human-based, it follows deductively whatever the resultants it cannot be p-realist but has to be antirealist [Kantian and the like].
You continue to conflate the two different issues. You've no idea what you're talking about.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2024 2:41 amYour view is based on ignorance.Atla wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 5:23 amThere is no reason to think that locality/non-locality has anything to do with p realism/anti-realism. You start with equating them.Veritas Aequitas wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2024 4:06 am How Physicists Proved The Universe Isn't Locally Real
Nobel Prize in Physics 2022 EXPLAINED
Dr. Ben Miles
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=txlCvCSefYQ
Notes:
In the video local realism = p-realism, while non-local realism = antirealism.
Therefore ideological and dogmatic p-realism of local realism is actually unreal and illusory.
Discuss??
Views??
ChatGpt already informed you [somewhere] that scientists related to QM are divided into two camps, i.e. antirealists and p-realists.
Einstein [God do not play dice, hidden-variables] is a p-realist and is a staunch believer of locality.