For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Metaphysics.Aetixintro wrote:Besides, who I am may not be an accident at all, but follows beautifully down the family tree of life and genetics, from ancient ancestors to my parents (and to myself) today...
Also? How come we went from Metaphysics to Phil of Sci? As at least I thought it should be in Applied Ethics meself.Electron wrote:I do not find that the replies here have a basis in either science or academic learning ;so you will excuse me if I take leave of this forum .
Envious ! You COMPLETE CRETIN. That's what this site is all about ; fucking ' "pseuds" corner 'Aetixintro wrote:
Agreed, Arising_uk!
PS: Probably badly hidden envy anyhow! Did I mention "probably"...? hi-hi-hi
Who would want to debate with you?Arising_uk wrote:Personally,
I'm still interested in what ethical consequences are involved in such thoughts?
Electron wrote:Who would want to debate with you?
You have no original thoughts.
You contribute nothing to expand the intellectual horizon.
You are just a self obsessed pseudo intellectual like your friend.
Deluded and pitiful.
You sound familiar?The many worlds interpretation is not the only alternative to the Copenhagen one. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interpreta ... _mechanicsElectron wrote:It now appears to be the case that Hugh Everett III offers the only alternative to
The Copenhagen Interpretation .
The Double Slit Experiment confirms Superposition of the particle in all possible states.
This has been accepted by the academic world and now the upshot is ,that we exist independently, in many different scenarios , in a multiple universe
condition.
This has implications for ethics ,since we will take a number of routes and exist with each separate outcome.
Anyone who replies to this post will reply, will not reply ,will reply in support ,will reply with conjecture and all these variable states exist in an embodied form in a real universe.
So being called a TIT is familiar to you ? Yes I guess it is.Arising_uk wrote:Electron wrote:Who would want to debate with you?
You have no original thoughts.
You contribute nothing to expand the intellectual horizon.
You are just a self obsessed pseudo intellectual like your friend.
Deluded and pitiful.
The "we" would be identical in every detail. The only difference is the change of circumstances.i blame blame wrote:
The "we" in another universe wouldn't actually be "us". They'd be a very similar person, but not identical to us, as they have had different experiences. As we move forward in time, these differences accumulate.
As wanker must be for you, but are you going to get around to saying what these ethical implications are? Or have you already done so in another world?Electron wrote:So being called a TIT is familiar to you ? Yes I guess it is.
So, not every detail. An essential part of personal identity is one's experiences. Different circumstances make different people.Electron wrote: The "we" would be identical in every detail. The only difference is the change of circumstances.