Philosophy Now Forum

attofishpi wrote: ↑Sat Jul 08, 2023 11:48 am
Ridiculous waffle.

Do not list me.

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:22 pm Mmmm, no.

The question of whether God is necessary can and does only arise to the artificial sense of 'me'

The question comes from the position of 'me, which is always dissatisfied and is therefore looking for benefit to satisfy it.
It is incompleteness seeking completeness. Only lack needs benefit. Right here and now, nowhere, nothing is lacking.

For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0


.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:27 pm
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0

If God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.

https://youtu.be/Jwtyn-L-2gQ

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:22 pm
I don't know what gets into me sometimes; just crazy, I guess.

Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:55 pm

If God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.

Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:55 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:27 pm
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0

If God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.

https://youtu.be/Jwtyn-L-2gQ

Right you are, Harbal!

Belinda wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 4:28 pm

Harbal wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:55 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Jul 09, 2023 12:27 pm
For 'me' is the very movement of dissatisfaction. The 'me' cannot get no satisfaction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nrIPxlFzDi0

If God isn't working for you, there's an alternative.

https://youtu.be/Jwtyn-L-2gQ

Right you are, Harbal!

It's great to see you, Belinda. I've been wondering where you were; it seems ages since I last saw you.

'God' is a fallacy caused by the idea of separation.

Separation is to name the nameless. To conceptualise the nonconceptual. To image the imageless. To know the unknown.

'What is' cannot tell 'what is' (itself) what is IS.
'What is' can only be IS ( SELF ) There is only SELF (what is)

'What is' has no opposite. 'What is' is complete unto itself.

If God existed it would not be necessary to invent him.

If God did not exist is would also not be necessary to invent him.

If God was invented then it would not be necessary for him to exist.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Jul 12, 2023 10:58 am

Which is it. Meme 1 or meme 2 you can't have both.
Either there is a self or there is not. Make up your mind.
(if you can)

Is Martian Necessary?

Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Jul 07, 2023 7:22 pm Mmmm, no.

...only as the main subject of discussion, along with Marx, on philosophy forums.