Re: Social Politics / The American Scene
Posted: Sat Apr 29, 2023 7:57 pm
I didn’t think so.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
I didn’t think so.
I am still very interested in what you have to say to this. Something? Nothing at all?
Can you offer some concrete examples of how you have applied your interesting methods to examine topical political issues. Which ones? I am interested to be shown how it can be done. Are you asserting you have a developed skill, or are you speaking “purely theoretically” about a talent you are working on or imagine attainable?
Why would anyone be interested in what you have to say when you start your responses with the likes of the following?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:02 pmI am still very interested in what you have to say to this. Something? Nothing at all?
Even if one were to overlook the above, your posts have been low quality at best. Even worse, you seem oblivious to this fact.Non-ironically, but typically if also depressingly, you are (to coin a popular phrase) “talking out of your asshole” as many are inclined to do. I had a paranoid thought that you Chat GPTd your response!
The world is getting frightening!
Take it like a man — and get to the core of what you indicate you are here to communicate. Hop over every obstacle. Don’t be side-tracked!ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 11:18 pmWhy would anyone be interested in what you have to say when you start your responses with the likes of the following?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:02 pmI am still very interested in what you have to say to this. Something? Nothing at all?
Even if one were to overlook the above, your posts have been low quality at best. Even worse, you seem oblivious to this fact.Non-ironically, but typically if also depressingly, you are (to coin a popular phrase) “talking out of your asshole” as many are inclined to do. I had a paranoid thought that you Chat GPTd your response!
The world is getting frightening!
Quoting you:Can you offer some concrete examples of how you have applied your interesting methods to examine topical political issues. Which ones? I am interested to be shown how it can be done. Are you asserting you have a developed skill, or are you speaking “purely theoretically” about a talent you are working on or imagine attainable?
Put me aside! It’s about you now.Why would anyone be interested in what you have to say when you start your responses with the likes of the following?
It's as if you have the emotional and intellectual maturity of a young teen.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 12:03 amTake it like a man — and get to the core of what you indicate you are here to communicate. Hop over every obstacle. Don’t be side-tracked!ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 11:18 pmWhy would anyone be interested in what you have to say when you start your responses with the likes of the following?Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sat Apr 29, 2023 8:02 pm
I am still very interested in what you have to say to this. Something? Nothing at all?
Even if one were to overlook the above, your posts have been low quality at best. Even worse, you seem oblivious to this fact.Non-ironically, but typically if also depressingly, you are (to coin a popular phrase) “talking out of your asshole” as many are inclined to do. I had a paranoid thought that you Chat GPTd your response!
The world is getting frightening!
Here it is again:
Quoting you:Can you offer some concrete examples of how you have applied your interesting methods to examine topical political issues. Which ones? I am interested to be shown how it can be done. Are you asserting you have a developed skill, or are you speaking “purely theoretically” about a talent you are working on or imagine attainable?
Put me aside! It’s about you now.Why would anyone be interested in what you have to say when you start your responses with the likes of the following?
Be that as it may the entire world, the Universe, indeed THE COSMOS is waiting, as I am, to be instructed by you.ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:35 am It's as if you have the emotional and intellectual maturity of a young teen.
Can you offer some concrete examples of how you have applied your interesting methods to examine topical political issues. Which ones? I am interested to be shown how it can be done. Are you asserting you have a developed skill, or are you speaking “purely theoretically” about a talent you are working on or imagine attainable?
And you wonder why so many think that there are a lot of stupid people in the US.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:39 amBe that as it may the entire world, the Universe, indeed THE COSMOS is waiting, as I am, to be instructed by you.ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:35 am It's as if you have the emotional and intellectual maturity of a young teen.
Can you offer some concrete examples of how you have applied your interesting methods to examine topical political issues. Which ones? I am interested to be shown how it can be done. Are you asserting you have a developed skill, or are you speaking “purely theoretically” about a talent you are working on or imagine attainable?
I’m in Colombia.ThinkOfOne wrote: ↑Sun Apr 30, 2023 1:44 am And you wonder why so many think that there are a lot of stupid people in the US.
Humans are a biological species with some variations.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Apr 26, 2023 4:30 pm It would be interesting I think to initiate a conversation on the topic What is going on in America today? I wonder how much preamble the question I am proposing requires? Yes, it is a topical and a political issue, but are not *philosophical perspectives* the best perspectives for analysis?
Perhaps it is possible to begin by referring to the recent, and interesting, firing of Tucker Carlson from his Fox News show. I would be curious to know if those who post here (am I right to believe that about 50% who write here are English and the other 50% American?) watch either Fox News or the Tucker Carlson show?
I am curious, obviously, how people here frame the civil and political conflict in the US. But doesn't the issues that are sources of conflict in America also have their correspondence in all of the European countries?
I try to read as widely as possible, from Antifa-like sites (Its Going Down for example) to those on the other fringe -- for example Unz Review, and of course the NYTs I read daily.
Here is an article now on the Unz Review website. Ron Unz is definitely an oddball but he has created what might be described as a weird hodge-podge of dissident (and sometimes even loopy) voices who are entirely excluded from the so-called mainstream. These include people and voices formally and entirely considered crimethink. So be warned.
Here is one that makes an effort to frame the Carlson firing as part of general *deplatforming*.
I would appreciate knowing what your sources of information are. Please post links as I'd like to examine them.
Although it is easy, naturally, to make blanket comments about American stupidity and all the rest, or how disgusting certain figures are, it might be best to avoid easy statements and try to keep things toned-down.
Frankly, there are some shows I've watched of TC on YouTube (I do not watch TV) that have impressed me to a significant degree. For example his *expose* on the 'vulture capitalism' of Paul Singer's investment group:
(What is Destroying Rural America).
And his speech at the Heritage Foundation I thought was quite good.
My own view is that it is better for all concerned to understand what is going on rather than simply to criticize or support one faction or another. Seeing clearly is often quite different from having a specific position or taking a side.
Interesting. The Intercept has this to say.
It's just shadow theater. One can see the levers roughly moving the silhouettes.
The "American Scene" is basically comprised of a large group of humans who are oblivious of the fact that they are reaping the necrotizing returns of the negative karma they have been sowing across the planet over the preceding decades in the form of imperialistic treacheries.
I am not completely on-board with your too stark, too reductive analysis, but what I can say is that the Intercept is making some good points about complicity of interests.
"What They don't tell you is that..." is an excellent tool.Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Mon May 01, 2023 5:53 pmI am not completely on-board with your too stark, too reductive analysis, but what I can say is that the Intercept is making some good points about complicity of interests.
There is a great deal more to the phenomenon of Tucker Carlson and he must be seen in the larger context of the phenomenon of Donald Trump -- and that is not an easy. I have not yet encountered anyone who can talk non-hysterically about Donald Trump.
It may well be that Carlson is a very very compromised mouthpiece, but there are many things he does talk about that no one else will. And he reaches those people who feel the same.
How to talk *fairly and rationally* about these things is my desired object, but there in no one available who can take a non-biased, removed stance.