Re: The Arbiters of Truth
Posted: Sat Apr 16, 2022 3:00 pm
Is this true?
Shocking: One Industry Insider Suggests The U.S. Government Plays A HUGE Role In Twitter
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/bl ... ore-231743
From the link:
“There is no business model where Twitter is financially viable to operate…. UNLESS the tech architecture under the platform was subsidized.
“In my opinion, there is only one technological system and entity that could possibly underwrite the cost of Twitter to operate. That entity is the United States Government, and here’s why.”
“If my hunch is correct, Elon Musk is poised to expose the well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy. Let that sink in.”
Implications: First Amendment to the US Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
- Twitter abridges freedom of speech. It's not written law that Twitter and other companies can do this, but it's government approved, and they're effectively acting as government agents.
Shocking: One Industry Insider Suggests The U.S. Government Plays A HUGE Role In Twitter
https://theconservativetreehouse.com/bl ... ore-231743
From the link:
“There is no business model where Twitter is financially viable to operate…. UNLESS the tech architecture under the platform was subsidized.
“In my opinion, there is only one technological system and entity that could possibly underwrite the cost of Twitter to operate. That entity is the United States Government, and here’s why.”
“If my hunch is correct, Elon Musk is poised to expose the well-kept secret that most social media platforms are operating on U.S. government tech infrastructure and indirect subsidy. Let that sink in.”
Implications: First Amendment to the US Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
- Twitter abridges freedom of speech. It's not written law that Twitter and other companies can do this, but it's government approved, and they're effectively acting as government agents.