Philosophy Now Forum

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:25 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:33 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu Apr 28, 2022 10:59 pm

Your absence of silence is hypocritical....that and the statement "Whereof one cannot speak, thereof one must be silent" is a self-contradiction, which is fine with me because my premises are in contradictions but not for you.

This leads to a question for you:

"What is not a contradiction?"

You are confused.
One minute my silence is hypocritical then my absence of silence is hypocritical - make up your mind!
I always speak whereof I may. It's just that you have lost contact with reality as your posts clearly show.

It is both hypocritical and not-hypocritical as it, that is your absence of silence, is relative to context. This "both" should comes as no surprise to you as my previous boths takes a "both/and" approach when observing what seems to be an opposition.

And again:

"What is not a contradiction?"

Please refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 8:40 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:25 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri Apr 29, 2022 12:33 pm
You are confused.
One minute my silence is hypocritical then my absence of silence is hypocritical - make up your mind!
I always speak whereof I may. It's just that you have lost contact with reality as your posts clearly show.

It is both hypocritical and not-hypocritical as it, that is your absence of silence, is relative to context. This "both" should comes as no surprise to you as my previous boths takes a "both/and" approach when observing what seems to be an opposition.

And again:

"What is not a contradiction?"

Please refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.

You are ignoring my question...."What is not a contradiction?"

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 10:38 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 8:40 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 12:25 am

It is both hypocritical and not-hypocritical as it, that is your absence of silence, is relative to context. This "both" should comes as no surprise to you as my previous boths takes a "both/and" approach when observing what seems to be an opposition.

And again:

"What is not a contradiction?"

Please refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.

You are ignoring my question...."What is not a contradiction?"

A contradiction is what you are and not a contradiction is what I say.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 1:43 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 10:38 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 8:40 am
Please refer to my previous posts as these issues have already been taken care of.

You are ignoring my question...."What is not a contradiction?"

A contradiction is what you are and not a contradiction is what I say.

And what do you say that is not relative?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 12:27 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 1:43 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 05, 2022 10:38 pm

You are ignoring my question...."What is not a contradiction?"

A contradiction is what you are and not a contradiction is what I say.

And what do you say that is not relative?

That's your problem, which by your own logic is meaningless.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 9:18 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 12:27 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 06, 2022 1:43 pm

A contradiction is what you are and not a contradiction is what I say.

And what do you say that is not relative?

That's your problem, which by your own logic is meaningless.

And I will ask again: What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

You really need to learn to read at your age or get some glasses:

I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:

1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.

****Everything is the same as nothing as the totality of being is without comparison thus is indefinite.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:09 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 9:18 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 12:27 am

And what do you say that is not relative?

That's your problem, which by your own logic is meaningless.

And I will ask again: What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

You can ask me as many times as you like but since you have already undermined everything you say by calling it meaningless there is not point talking to you.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:32 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:09 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 9:18 am
That's your problem, which by your own logic is meaningless.

And I will ask again: What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

You can ask me as many times as you like but since you have already undermined everything you say by calling it meaningless there is not point talking to you.

You just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.

I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:

I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:

1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:32 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:09 pm

And I will ask again: What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

You can ask me as many times as you like but since you have already undermined everything you say by calling it meaningless there is not point talking to you.

You just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.

I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:

I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:

1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.

Please refer to the comments I made above.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:44 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 12, 2022 7:32 pm

You can ask me as many times as you like but since you have already undermined everything you say by calling it meaningless there is not point talking to you.

You just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.

I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:

I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:

1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.

Please refer to the comments I made above.

Your ability to only repeat what you have said proves how exhausted your mental abilities are.

If "relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything" then there is a point in you answering my question:

What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 11:59 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:44 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed May 18, 2022 11:23 pm

You just talked to me...it would be relatively pointless for you not to answer the question.

I never said "meaningless" if nothing equates to everything. Again:

I will say again in different words, which can be view synonymously to the previous statements:

1. Relational truths point to nothing.
2. As pointing to nothing relational truths are pointing to an absence of thingness.
3. In pointing to an absence of thingness relational truths reveal reality as indefinite because of the aforementioned pointing.
4. As pointing to nothing, ie an absence of thingness, the relational truths point to everything as everything is the same as nothing considering "everything" has no comparison to allow forms.
5. Relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything.

Please refer to the comments I made above.

Your ability to only repeat what you have said proves how exhausted your mental abilities are.

If "relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything" then there is a point in you answering my question:

What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

Please refer to the comments I made above.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:45 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 11:59 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 8:44 am
Please refer to the comments I made above.

Your ability to only repeat what you have said proves how exhausted your mental abilities are.

If "relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything" then there is a point in you answering my question:

What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

Please refer to the comments I made above.

They do not answer the question as to what this "thing" is.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Fri May 27, 2022 12:24 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Fri May 20, 2022 11:45 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Thu May 19, 2022 11:59 pm

Your ability to only repeat what you have said proves how exhausted your mental abilities are.

If "relational truths in meaning nothing mean everything" then there is a point in you answering my question:

What is this "thing" relational truths point to?

Please refer to the comments I made above.

They do not answer the question as to what this "thing" is.

Ditto