Philosophy Now Forum

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:44 am The unity of all being necessitates the most seemingly seperate terms as fundamentally connected.

A "wisdom" generator, ie AI, would be the tying of these seemingly seperate terms together to form a statement.

From the perspective of all being connected this necessitates the most absurd sayings as having fundamental meaning upon closer inspection. A rational statement can be formed together from the tying together of any words.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 4:24 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:39 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 4:11 pm

Because United necessitates a series of parts working together.

This is very True, but this does NOT answer the actual clarifying question I asked here.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 08, 2021 4:11 pm Being the only United one implies there are others which are not united.

This is completely Untrue.

Being the only united One does NOT imply there are "others", which are not united. Being the ONLY united One actually means that there is NO "other". The 'only' word makes this CLEAR.

It implies there are others which are un-united.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 11:06 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:44 am The unity of all being necessitates the most seemingly seperate terms as fundamentally connected.

You mean. My cat eats mice is fundementally connected to M31 is also known as the ANdromeda Galaxy?

A "wisdom" generator, ie AI, would be the tying of these seemingly seperate terms together to form a statement.

You clearly have no idea of how a computer fucntions.

From the perspective of all being connected this necessitates the most absurd sayings as having fundamental meaning upon closer inspection. A rational statement can be formed together from the tying together of any words.

I'm not going to hold my breath

Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 11:22 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 4:24 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 5:39 am

This is very True, but this does NOT answer the actual clarifying question I asked here.



This is completely Untrue.

Being the only united One does NOT imply there are "others", which are not united. Being the ONLY united One actually means that there is NO "other". The 'only' word makes this CLEAR.

It implies there are others which are un-united.

Only if you BELIEVE there are "others" would the saying, 'thee ONLY, united, One' imply there are "others", which are un-united (or even united).

You do NOT YET seem to UNDERSTAND that the saying, 'thee ONLY One', ACTUALLY MEANS there is NO 'other'.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:56 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 11:06 pm

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue May 18, 2021 1:44 am The unity of all being necessitates the most seemingly seperate terms as fundamentally connected.

You mean. My cat eats mice is fundementally connected to M31 is also known as the ANdromeda Galaxy?

A "wisdom" generator, ie AI, would be the tying of these seemingly seperate terms together to form a statement.

You clearly have no idea of how a computer fucntions.

From the perspective of all being connected this necessitates the most absurd sayings as having fundamental meaning upon closer inspection. A rational statement can be formed together from the tying together of any words.

I'm not going to hold my breath

1. The act of the cat eating the mouse is connected to another phenomenon. This connection shares the same nature as the Andromeda galaxy.

2. It is "function" not "fucntions". A wisdom generator would tie a seemingly seperate set of words into a statement.

3. That is because you continually blow hot air.

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:12 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:56 pm

Sculptor wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 11:06 pm
You mean. My cat eats mice is fundementally connected to M31 is also known as the ANdromeda Galaxy?

You clearly have no idea of how a computer fucntions.


I'm not going to hold my breath

1. The act of the cat eating the mouse is connected to another phenomenon. This connection shares the same nature as the Andromeda galaxy.

2. It is "function" not "fucntions". A wisdom generator would tie a seemingly seperate set of words into a statement.

3. That is because you continually blow hot air.

Yes I'll fuck off and leave you then. Save myself the time, since you are not listening

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:00 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 11:22 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Wed Jun 09, 2021 4:24 pm

It implies there are others which are un-united.

Only if you BELIEVE there are "others" would the saying, 'thee ONLY, united, One' imply there are "others", which are un-united (or even united).

You do NOT YET seem to UNDERSTAND that the saying, 'thee ONLY One', ACTUALLY MEANS there is NO 'other'.

The only one that is United allows for others to exist which are not united.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:00 am There are no others which are united thus if there is another then it is un-United.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:27 am

Sculptor wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:12 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 14, 2021 11:56 pm

1. The act of the cat eating the mouse is connected to another phenomenon. This connection shares the same nature as the Andromeda galaxy.

2. It is "function" not "fucntions". A wisdom generator would tie a seemingly seperate set of words into a statement.

3. That is because you continually blow hot air.

Yes I'll fuck off and leave you then. Save myself the time, since you are not listening

No need to fuck off, your responses can be construed as masturbatory.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 2:45 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:00 am

Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 10, 2021 11:22 am

Only if you BELIEVE there are "others" would the saying, 'thee ONLY, united, One' imply there are "others", which are un-united (or even united).

You do NOT YET seem to UNDERSTAND that the saying, 'thee ONLY One', ACTUALLY MEANS there is NO 'other'.

The only one that is United allows for others to exist which are not united.

But thee ONLY One that is united does NOT allow for "others" to exist. The words 'thee ONLY One' confirm this.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:00 am There are no others which are united thus if there is another then it is un-United.

The words, "if there is another", is moot, because there is NO "other". There is ONLY One.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 5:17 pm

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 2:45 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:00 am

The only one that is United allows for others to exist which are not united.

But thee ONLY One that is united does NOT allow for "others" to exist. The words 'thee ONLY One' confirm this.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 12:00 am There are no others which are united thus if there is another then it is un-United.

The words, "if there is another", is moot, because there is NO "other". There is ONLY One.

The others which exist are ununited as "I am thee only one united".

Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:37 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 5:17 pm

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 2:45 am

But thee ONLY One that is united does NOT allow for "others" to exist. The words 'thee ONLY One' confirm this.



The words, "if there is another", is moot, because there is NO "other". There is ONLY One.

The others which exist are ununited as "I am thee only one united".

What 'others'?

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:37 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 15, 2021 5:17 pm

The others which exist are ununited as "I am thee only one united".

What 'others'?

That which are not united.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:56 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 pm

Age wrote: ↑Thu Jun 17, 2021 4:37 am

What 'others'?

That which are not united.

Like WHAT, EXACTLY?

If you can NOT and will NOT provide ANY of these, so called, "others", then 'you' are PROVING my CLAIM True, for 'me'.

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:56 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 21, 2021 9:08 pm

That which are not united.

Like WHAT, EXACTLY?

If you can NOT and will NOT provide ANY of these, so called, "others", then 'you' are PROVING my CLAIM True, for 'me'.

The absence of a unified mind existing through fragmented thoughts is one example.

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 3:23 am

Eodnhoj7 wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 2:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Tue Jun 22, 2021 1:56 am

Like WHAT, EXACTLY?

If you can NOT and will NOT provide ANY of these, so called, "others", then 'you' are PROVING my CLAIM True, for 'me'.

The absence of a unified mind existing through fragmented thoughts is one example.

EXCELLENT example.

Although thee Mind, Itself, CAN NOT and IS NOT EVER absent, DISTORTED, False, Wrong, or Incorrect 'thoughts' ACTUALLY does PREVENT and/or BLOCK OUT 'thee Mind'.

See, how when 'you', human beings, are JUST Truly OPEN and Honest, when CLARIFYING questions are posed to you, thee ACTUAL True, Right, AND Correct ANSWERS come SHINING through, BRIGHTLY.

Do you have ANY other examples.