Philosophy Now Forum

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:20 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:04 pm

So, to you, any conceptualising of 'a word' is simply the story of 'a word', correct?

Yes, words are a form of language, which is like a knowledge, which is like a story. A word, any word is just an 'idea' that becomes materialised within the unknowable, in other words, a 'word' is a known image of the imageless.

So, if a 'word' is a "KNOWN image of the imageless", then this could infer that 'it' is NOT 'unknown' at all, really?

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:20 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:04 pmAlso, were you really expecting ANY one to guess what, exactly, you were referring to and talking about here?

No, I do not expect -

Readers here, are free to make up their own mind about what they read and how they choose to interpret what they are reading.

.

Okay, if 'it' is so, so be 'it', correct?

And, so you really did not care one iota how ANY one interpreted your previous use of the word 'it', especially considering there was absolutely NO reference at all with what you were talking about and referencing when using that 'it', correct?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:04 pm
Okay, if 'it' is so, so be 'it', correct?

And, so you really did not care one iota how ANY one interpreted your previous use of the word 'it', especially considering there was absolutely NO reference at all with what you were talking about and referencing when using that 'it', correct?

Mind can only refer to itself. What else is there to refer to?

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:49 pm So, if a 'word' is a "KNOWN image of the imageless", then this could infer that 'it' is NOT 'unknown' at all, really?

The word 'unknown' is also known. So not really unknown no.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:30 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 12:04 pm
Okay, if 'it' is so, so be 'it', correct?

And, so you really did not care one iota how ANY one interpreted your previous use of the word 'it', especially considering there was absolutely NO reference at all with what you were talking about and referencing when using that 'it', correct?

Mind can only refer to itself. What else is there to refer to?

To WHAT thee 'Mind' ACTUALLY IS.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 3:32 pm

Age wrote: ↑Wed Mar 31, 2021 2:49 pm So, if a 'word' is a "KNOWN image of the imageless", then this could infer that 'it' is NOT 'unknown' at all, really?

The word 'unknown' is also known. So not really unknown no.

Okay.