Philosophy Now Forum

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 8:48 am I'm just on an eternal quest ..quest I on to understand what the REAL meaning of the word LOVE means.

If you focus on the word you've already made a wrong turn.

Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 2:18 pm

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 8:48 am I'm just on an eternal quest ..quest I on to understand what the REAL meaning of the word LOVE means.

If you focus on the word you've already made a wrong turn.

Thank you. I've just realised, I'm not very good at putting into words what I am trying to say. Your reply made me realise something. I know what LOVE is, I know what REAL LOVE is. It's just that I am on a quest to implement REAL LOVE into my personal reality. I'VE NEVER MET ANOTHER HUMAN BEING so far who knows LOVE for it's real meaning, who have also implemented in their life too.

Hope that makes better sense. sorry about the caps as well, my laptop has no light to warn me they are on, and so sometimes I can't be bothered to undo them.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:09 am That's right, and while people are so adamant that they are right, then it would seem they would be only interested in winning any ensuing argument which would be pointless for they would not have to argue their point if it was already known to be right. Arguing what already feels right with someone is a trivial pursuit, one either knows the answer they seek or they do not.

Yes! Good point!

I've never been into arguing much because I don't think it matters when there are so many possibilities. And I don't typically think I must know something to be certainly true. I can potentially swim around boulders/obstructions in the flow -- and focus on manifesting a course beyond them -- which I've done a lot in my life... as long as I remember.

Last night, my partner told me he's amazed by how much I've manifested (and other people have said this too.) For me, it has felt so completely natural and possible, and that MAKES SENSE to me! In life, I've seen, that rules and expectations don't need to bind or deter. Instead, they present a challenge (like a game puzzle) to be worked around or flown above/beyond. We decide what to treat as solid -- and what we can or cannot do in relation to that. I may choose to play along with certain games in some ways/times... but I don't have to plod along as an inactive game character. I can use and continue expanding my collection of "secret power cards".

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:09 amdid you know that you do not exist without your reflection. Your reflection is the external world that you know to be out-there separate from you.

I do not think about such things in a way of "knowing" them. I don't think there ultimately is any separation, but I accept that the idea of separateness is part of this Earth experience/dream (to some extent)... which I strive to enjoy/appreciate my experience/interactions within.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 9:09 amAnd yes, we are only interacting with our selves. For fun and entertainment...and the expansion of knowledge.

Well, there's a lot of ignorance being explored and embraced... so it seems (to me) that it's about creatively and exhaustively exploring all potentials... rather than for just expanding "knowledge". Fun and entertainment have always been a good focus in my experience.

Human love is vastly overrated; it too easily flows into its opposite. More often than not it resembles an ego in collusion with something very favorable to itself adopting it accordingly. Most of human love is centered in the ego identified by ownership. Real love is that which has no opposite and not like its human aspect at all. It's a creative demiurge which came along long before humans arrived who are only its inheritors in a surpassingly mongrelized form.

Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:41 pm Human love is vastly overrated; it too easily flows into its opposite. More often than not it resembles an ego in collusion with something very favorable to itself adopting it accordingly. Most of human love is centered in the ego identified by ownership. Real love is that which has no opposite and not like its human aspect at all. It's a creative demiurge which came along long before humans arrived who are only its inheritors in a surpassingly mongrelized form.

No earthly fleshy man is man enough to take my woman...signed God

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:09 am

Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:41 pm Human love is vastly overrated; it too easily flows into its opposite. More often than not it resembles an ego in collusion with something very favorable to itself adopting it accordingly. Most of human love is centered in the ego identified by ownership. Real love is that which has no opposite and not like its human aspect at all. It's a creative demiurge which came along long before humans arrived who are only its inheritors in a surpassingly mongrelized form.

No earthly fleshy man is man enough to take my woman...signed God

No idea what you're talking about

Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:30 am

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:09 am

Dubious wrote: ↑Sun Dec 06, 2020 11:41 pm Human love is vastly overrated; it too easily flows into its opposite. More often than not it resembles an ego in collusion with something very favorable to itself adopting it accordingly. Most of human love is centered in the ego identified by ownership. Real love is that which has no opposite and not like its human aspect at all. It's a creative demiurge which came along long before humans arrived who are only its inheritors in a surpassingly mongrelized form.

No earthly fleshy man is man enough to take my woman...signed God

No idea what you're talking about

It's too deep for earthly egoic man to see.

You cannot seek love or receive love from any other source but you yourself.

What you love about another self is emanating from your own self which will never leave, abandon, disappoint, or desert you. Trust in that ONE only.

God is the only Wo/Man... no earthly woman or man can take the place of God.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:31 am

Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:30 am

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 7:09 am

No earthly fleshy man is man enough to take my woman...signed God

No idea what you're talking about

It's too deep for earthly egoic man to see.

You cannot seek love or receive love from any other source but you yourself.

What you love about another self is emanating from your own self which will never leave, abandon, disappoint, or desert you. Trust in that ONE only.

God is the only Wo/Man... no earthly woman or man can take the place of God.

Does this god have a name or is the same god Immanuel prays to?

Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:14 am

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:31 am

Dubious wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 9:30 am

No idea what you're talking about

It's too deep for earthly egoic man to see.

You cannot seek love or receive love from any other source but you yourself.

What you love about another self is emanating from your own self which will never leave, abandon, disappoint, or desert you. Trust in that ONE only.

God is the only Wo/Man... no earthly woman or man can take the place of God.

Does this god have a name or is the same god Immanuel prays to?

God is just another word for everything and nothing.

Immanuel is a metaphorical character, the known manifestation / image .......of the imageless unknowable.


Oneness has no argument with itself. . . except in this conception by association.

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 9:02 am

Dubious wrote: ↑Tue Dec 08, 2020 12:14 am

Dontaskme wrote: ↑Mon Dec 07, 2020 10:31 am

It's too deep for earthly egoic man to see.

You cannot seek love or receive love from any other source but you yourself.

What you love about another self is emanating from your own self which will never leave, abandon, disappoint, or desert you. Trust in that ONE only.

God is the only Wo/Man... no earthly woman or man can take the place of God.

Does this god have a name or is the same god Immanuel prays to?

God is just another word for everything and nothing.

Immanuel is a metaphorical character, the known manifestation / image .......of the imageless unknowable.


Oneness has no argument with itself. . . except in this conception by association.

Everything as having a degree of consciousness necessitates God, as representing everything and nothing, as having and being consciousness.