Philosophy Now Forum

TheVisionofEr wrote: ↑Sun Mar 01, 2020 10:34 pm

The empirically existing field is absent of this skyscraper form

What form does it have, atom form? Or, the form of "absence" of form? In other words, how is it kept in the understanding at all?

A form is a series of converging and diverging points which summate to a given complex actual state of being. The points may be relative point particles, observed empirically, or may be a series of abstract viewpoints. Such thing as an atom may have a given form, as a series of points which summate to a sphere or looping type of shape.

The absense of form, dually, is an absence of converging and diverging points as a single point which is conducive to a boundless field. Take for example a single white point, it is formless and only seen for what it is against a black backdrop. Take away the black back drop and the point is fundamentally a formless abyss. Now if this formless abyss divides, a line between two points occurs as the division of the point. Formless self negates, through double negation, into form.

particles

So, you claim particles are not forms? But, something opposed to forms?

TheVisionofEr wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:01 am

particles

So, you claim particles are not forms? But, something opposed to forms?

The dualism between the point and boundless field can be observed a synonymous to the particle wave dualism.

The dualism between the point and boundless field can be observed a synonymous to the particle wave dualism.

So, you say some things are not forms?

TheVisionofEr wrote: ↑Mon Mar 02, 2020 12:28 am

The dualism between the point and boundless field can be observed a synonymous to the particle wave dualism.

So, you say some things are not forms?

Pure being, originating from a single point, is pure form as formlessness with form as the convergence and divergence of forms, thus points, necessitating the point as pure movement. The point is the synthesis between form and formless as the origin of both.