For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
You don't have a "quoting method" since you don't quote. Sometimes it's not even clear to whom or what you're referring. Your method is the coward's method since there's never an indication in the mailbox that you actually replied.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 8:46 pm Dubiuos,
As for my quoting method: I prefer it, will keep doing it, and whoever doesn't care for it can ignore my posts (and, mebbe, pound sand).
I agree, and he's also insufferably arrogant, but I don't find his 'method' as annoying as the 'split into bitesize bits' method practised by the likes of Arising UK. There is often no way of telling who they are adressing, or where the original post is. Is it because they can't write a complete paragraph, and need 'space to recover' between sentences?Dubious wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:14 pmYou don't have a "quoting method" since you don't quote. Sometimes it's not even clear to whom or what you're referring. Your method is the coward's method since there's never an indication in the mailbox that you actually replied.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 8:46 pm Dubiuos,
As for my quoting method: I prefer it, will keep doing it, and whoever doesn't care for it can ignore my posts (and, mebbe, pound sand).
Dominik, you are thinking too small.philosophic nature wrote: ↑Thu May 02, 2019 7:30 am Dear members,
sometimes humans talk about, that they would have NO soul.
Thats not understandable for me, because i think everybody must have a soul!
So i cant explain, why we should have no souls.
Soul is the aura, thé comprehensive part of our body.
The body of us is underlined with body, mind and soul.
To integrate those three parts is very interesting for me in my life.
So my aim is, to focus to bring those three parts in one way together to be lucky.
So the mind is not the soul, and the sojul is not the mind. The mind is under our soul.
What do you think bout those thinkings?
Best greetings
Dominik
Now that you mention it, I haven't seen any recent news items about proofs for the existence of oxygen or recent discoveries regarding the prevalence of gravity.
While at "annoying", I hate it when people who say they read a lot, they put a space between a word and the following comma or period, and leave no space between the period or comma and the word following it. Like this .Why are people morons ?I don't know ,but it sure annoys me ..vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:48 pmI agree, and he's also insufferably arrogant, but I don't find his 'method' as annoying as the 'split into bitesize bits' method practised by the likes of Arising UK. There is often no way of telling who they are adressing, or where the original post is. Is it because they can't write a complete paragraph, and need 'space to recover' between sentences?Dubious wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:14 pmYou don't have a "quoting method" since you don't quote. Sometimes it's not even clear to whom or what you're referring. Your method is the coward's method since there's never an indication in the mailbox that you actually replied.henry quirk wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 8:46 pm Dubiuos,
As for my quoting method: I prefer it, will keep doing it, and whoever doesn't care for it can ignore my posts (and, mebbe, pound sand).
Because he is, in my humble opinion.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 9:48 pmLater edit by -1-: (Like an annoying imbecile?) By -1-: strike this, it is a misquote, my apologies
In that case, Immanuel, please feel free to doubt their existence. If you can convince yourself there is such a thing as a soul, convincing yourself that oxygen and gravity don't exist should be a piece of cake. Unless, of course, you don't believe in cake.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:10 pmNow that you mention it, I haven't seen any recent news items about proofs for the existence of oxygen or recent discoveries regarding the prevalence of gravity.
You can simplify your solution even further into absolute simplicity, notwithstanding your near invisible dot which is what most of your posts amount to anyways, by disappearing completely so we can ignore ALL of you at the same time. That would be the ultimate simplification.
Is that a made up 'quote'? I can't find it. I don't recall calling Henry an imbecile.-1- wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:18 pmBecause he is, in my humble opinion.
Henry is a benign imbecile though. He believes in infinite simplifying. And other than altering the subject in any thread, his learning curve is flat.
I like Henry Quirk, though. Just as much as I like my bedbugs, my pet tapeworm and my wonderful leper bacteria.
But I can understand why he sticks to his guns, with regard to his annoying and ignorant habits. I'm sure he'd agree with this: If we successfully convinced Henry to correct all his annoying habits, then there would be nothing left of him.
If they didn't exist then we wouldn't be around to discuss it.Immanuel Can wrote: ↑Fri May 03, 2019 10:10 pmNow that you mention it, I haven't seen any recent news items about proofs for the existence of oxygen or recent discoveries regarding the prevalence of gravity.
The BBC should really up its game.