Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 1:28 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 3:45 am To all the PC scoundrels on here: what do you think of Ireland (do you think at all?), and the travesty of 'Northern Ireland', which was artificially created by being flooded with protestant English, ...

Presbyterian Scots.

What do you think of all the Catholic Scots who later moved to Scotland and imported their sectariansm into Scottish cities?
P.s.
Whoops! Should have been "Catholic Irish".

per historical fact, other way around, Scotts irish prot Northern part of Ireland,

not vice verse as your assursion,

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 7:55 pm Northern Irish protestants aren't Irish--they even have a horrible accent.

such pride from you.

you nor i are NI, i await their vote per the GFA.

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:24 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:That's not what this thread's about. It's about the British Govts.' deliberate campaign to undermine the Irish vote and ensure a royalist majority by exporting Britih protestants there. Genocide by sheer numbers. Northern Irish protestants aren't Irish--they even have a horrible accent. ...

Their descendants disagree, they call think themselves Irish but wish to be part of Britain, hence they call themselves Northern Irish.

exactly, world is not b/w but gray, NI was WAS legit part of UK per 300 yrs of history,

but per legalizma of the EU, the mandate of to the UK is a hard border in Ireland, and so..................

say goodbye to NI - post the legal future reforendum allowed per the GFA and my assumption of the results (say in England, or say a part of Europe (and so affirming being a citizen of ROI instead of England).
I do not use "British" becuase when Britain leaves the EU, Scotts and Welsh will leave the UK...................and so England will be the sole remainer.

serves them reich BTW

gaffo wrote: ↑Sun Mar 17, 2019 4:08 am

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 14, 2019 11:24 pm

vegetariantaxidermy wrote:That's not what this thread's about. It's about the British Govts.' deliberate campaign to undermine the Irish vote and ensure a royalist majority by exporting Britih protestants there. Genocide by sheer numbers. Northern Irish protestants aren't Irish--they even have a horrible accent. ...

Their descendants disagree, they call think themselves Irish but wish to be part of Britain, hence they call themselves Northern Irish.

exactly, world is not b/w but gray, NI was WAS legit part of UK per 300 yrs of history,

but per legalizma of the EU, the mandate of to the UK is a hard border in Ireland, and so..................

say goodbye to NI - post the legal future reforendum allowed per the GFA and my assumption of the results (say in England, or say a part of Europe (and so affirming being a citizen of ROI instead of England).
I do not use "British" becuase when Britain leaves the EU, Scotts and Welsh will leave the UK...................and so England will be the sole remainer.

serves them reich BTW

Funny, the EU has only been around since 1993. How on earth did the UK manage before then? (and it was still made up of Scotland/Wales....)

gaffo wrote: per historical fact, other way around, Scotts irish prot Northern part of Ireland,

not vice verse as your assursion,

Not really as I was talking about the reverse mass immigration from Ireland to Scotland during the Irish Famine.

gaffo wrote:exactly, world is not b/w but gray, NI was WAS legit part of UK per 300 yrs of history,

but per legalizma of the EU, the mandate of to the UK is a hard border in Ireland, and so..................

Well not necessarily on the UK part but the EU will want to impose a border there and I agree that logically there will have to be one as there is no way the Northern Irish will have one in the Irish Sea.

say goodbye to NI - post the legal future reforendum allowed per the GFA and my assumption of the results (say in England, or say a part of Europe (and so affirming being a citizen of ROI instead of England).

Well given NI did largely vote remain the issue of a united Ireland under the EU may arise but again a very big ask for the Northern Irish and I doubt the Irish Republic would actually want them.

I do not use "British" becuase when Britain leaves the EU, Scotts and Welsh will leave the UK...................and so England will be the sole remainer.

I can see the Scots calling another referendum after we leave but I seriously doubt the Welsh will leave.

serves them reich BTW

Why? Just because they don't wish to be part of the an unelected federal super-state of nations?

how did the EU even come to be?

can someone give me a rundown as a native? (i am not european)

i'm tempted to google it but i expect i might have to wade through some PC crap to get at the real story...wikipedia itself has a strong liberal and incidentally pro-eu bias

or is there just one set of accepted facts regarding why or how it emerged? it is similar to the united nations after ww1?

How is it PC?

Thinking that N.I. is/was a 'bad' thing has long be a PC thought.

It's just an observation. It's not 'my' definition. It's 'the' definition.
Stick your straw men, if that's all you have.

Why a strawman? You've claimed before that by the definition of a country that colonists weren't in the wrong in colonizing a place, your point applies to Ireland so I was just wondering why it doesn't in this case?

11011 wrote:how did the EU even come to be?

can someone give me a rundown as a native? (i am not european)

i'm tempted to google it but i expect i might have to wade through some PC crap to get at the real story...wikipedia itself has a strong liberal and incidentally pro-eu bias ...

What are you talking about?

or is there just one set of accepted facts regarding why or how it emerged? it is similar to the united nations after ww1?

Same hope but due to WWII.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_ ... _Community

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 12:01 am

How is it PC?

Thinking that N.I. is/was a 'bad' thing has long be a PC thought.

How is it PC? Typical of the PC. They are too stupid to understand what PC is, or recognise themselves.
You're a pom. How many poms do you think would vote to get rid of NI? I mean, the protestant NIrish don't even call themselves Irish, they call them selves 'British'. You have no case. It's just a shame the IRA didn't manage to blow up your in-bred, parasitic royals.

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: How is it PC? Typical of the PC. They are too stupid to understand what PC is, or recognise themselves.
You're a pom. How many poms do you think would vote to get rid of NI? I mean, the protestant NIrish don't even call themselves Irish, they call them selves 'British'. You have no case. It's just a shame the IRA didn't manage to blow up your in-bred, parasitic royals.

It has been the bete noir of the PC left since the 70's.

No-one who thinks themselves British calls themselves 'British' unless they are talking to Johnny foreigner.

Of course I have a case, as it was your case that colonists cannot be taking over a country if that country did not meet the definition you gave and Ireland at that time did not meet that definition, so by definition the Ulster colonists were doing no wrong.

Since you seem so concenered by the Irish question I ask once again what you would do about the situation and once again would you also be applying this solution to N.Z.?

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 1:47 am

vegetariantaxidermy wrote: How is it PC? Typical of the PC. They are too stupid to understand what PC is, or recognise themselves.
You're a pom. How many poms do you think would vote to get rid of NI? I mean, the protestant NIrish don't even call themselves Irish, they call them selves 'British'. You have no case. It's just a shame the IRA didn't manage to blow up your in-bred, parasitic royals.

It has been the bete noir of the PC left since the 70's.

No-one who thinks themselves British calls themselves 'British' unless they are talking to Johnny foreigner.

Of course I have a case, as it was your case that colonists cannot be taking over a country if that country did not meet the definition you gave and Ireland at that time did not meet that definition, so by definition the Ulster colonists were doing no wrong.

Since you seem so concenered by the Irish question I ask once again what you would do about the situation and once again would you also be applying this solution to N.Z.?

Who cares what you 'think'. Stupid pom.

My! How little you become when you have to think about what you've said. Surely there must be a social network site you can go wank on about PC gone mad?

Arising_uk wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 2:37 am My! How little you become when you have to think about what you've said. Surely there must be a social network site you can go wank on about PC gone mad?

Speaking of wankers.....

Not found that site yet? Try 4Chan it'll suit you.