Re: Why are we here on a philosophy forum?
Posted: Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:56 am
Because if I went and sat in a philosophy classroom to discuss things at the local university, they'd probably just kick me out for not paying tuition.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Because if I went and sat in a philosophy classroom to discuss things at the local university, they'd probably just kick me out for not paying tuition.
I was paying tuition. They kicked me out anyway.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:56 am Because if I went and sat in a philosophy classroom to discuss things at the local university, they'd probably just kick me out for not paying tuition.
The nature of that Entity is in two parts/senses.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:46 amWell said. It's been a quest for us both, i'm sure, since we had the magnitude of thought to wonder why a ripple forms when we break the surface of a puddle with our feet.melancocky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:42 amI want to find truth about being and reality, whatever that means and wherever it leads.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:32 am Me, it's because I want to test my understanding of something extremely pro_found, and the reasoning of other intelligent minds at the other end of keyboards..with what I suggest to them.
What about you?
I also want to make friends with others who feel this longing to know reality.
At the stage I am at, I wonder what it is that is the nature of the entity that constructs our reality.
By that statement, you must incur that humans have created our reality.Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:56 amThe nature of that Entity is in two parts/senses.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:46 amWell said. It's been a quest for us both, i'm sure, since we had the magnitude of thought to wonder why a ripple forms when we break the surface of a puddle with our feet.melancocky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 4:42 amI want to find truth about being and reality, whatever that means and wherever it leads.
I also want to make friends with others who feel this longing to know reality.
At the stage I am at, I wonder what it is that is the nature of the entity that constructs our reality.
In the spiritual sense that Entity is the one and only OPEN Mind, Itself, which is what has allowed human beings to have imagined, and then create, ALL of what they have.
From my comprehension of the entity, Panentheism is still the glove that fits best.
Certainly - reality, which I know is a construct of this 'God'\3rd party intelligence can be seen, but what any theist tends to fail to comprehend, is that it is also a key component of our consciousness, in that it knows every thought that passes through ones mind, it can force a thought to ones mind...in fact, if it decided it wanted you to go check the mail, you will do so, without even realising that it was not of your own will.Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:56 amBoth parts are very natural and so they are the Nature of the Entity, Itself.
Some might refer to that Spiritual part/sense as God, but in order for "things" to be created then physicality is needed. The Universe, Itself, is what the Creator IS, and some might refer to this also as God.
God is One Entity made up of two parts. One can be physical seen the other can not. But both are needed to construct ONE reality, obviously.
When one is en-light-ened, then they are, literally, up-lifted up off of the ground and on the wall the king is on. Wal.king in Spirit. Walking on our souls is walking with the Spirit, weightless and free. The weight has been lifted off our soles and into our spiritual Soul.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:07 am PS - Regarding understanding the nature of reality. The intricacies of logic placed within this common protocol is a reasonable place to start..
For example:-
Why do we walk on our souls? Why is heal so close to our soul?
When one knows WHY they are down, and weighted down, with sickness, then they KNOW how to prevent from being sick ever again. The spiritual up-lifting again, gained from this knowledge, allows that one to be able to walk again sky high in the knowledge that healing for ALL will soon begin also. With ALL walking, with wings, on their souls with the king of them ALL.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:07 am Why is heel so close to our sole? Why do we walk on our soles?
'Consciousness' is THAT what is the Creator, in the "nonphysical" or spiritual sense.melancocky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:53 am You had me at "the nature of the entity that constructs our reality." I am dying to know the relationship between my consciousness and reality (which would include the possible creator).
You lost me at the protocol and shoe stuff. I don't understand what you mean.
When I was in college, back before grade inflation, some fellow no one knew walked into one of our classes and sat in the back of the room. Our professor, a Russian, came in and took roll like he did every day. In fact, the attendance book was all he ever brought to class other than his cigarettes and his genius. He would chain smoke a whole pack during one lecture … one guess how he died. He had a signature move. When he finished with one he would toss it over his shoulder without looking, and it would bounce off the blackboard in a shower of sparks. At the end of class he would leave the pile of ashes for those paid to attend to such things. He noticed the new student and asked him who he was, and why was he here. The fellow said, to "audit" the class. The professor told him to leave. He told him that he must pay, like everyone else in the room. The professor valued the knowledge he was paid to share, and the years he spent acquiring not only his bona fides. It was quite respectful of the other students and the system of capitalism which he appreciated, having lived under Communist rule until he defected.Gary Childress wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 7:56 amBecause if I went and sat in a philosophy classroom to discuss things at the local university, they'd probably just kick me out for not paying tuition.
Actually, it was rhetorical questioning.Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:44 pmWhen one is en-light-ened, then they are, literally, up-lifted up off of the ground and on the wall the king is on. Wal.king in Spirit. Walking on our souls is walking with the Spirit, weightless and free. The weight has been lifted off our soles and into our spiritual Soul.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:07 am PS - Regarding understanding the nature of reality. The intricacies of logic placed within this common protocol is a reasonable place to start..
For example:-
Why do we walk on our souls? Why is heal so close to our soul?
When one knows WHY they are down, and weighted down, with sickness, then they KNOW how to prevent from being sick ever again. The spiritual up-lifting again, gained from this knowledge, allows that one to be able to walk again sky high in the knowledge that healing for ALL will soon begin also. With ALL walking, with wings, on their souls with the king of them ALL.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:07 am Why is heel so close to our sole? Why do we walk on our soles?
attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:10 pmPoint 2. is easier to address so i'll just go there. I am talking about our method of communication re protocol. - the English language - it has (if you can allow yourself to consider that there is a 3rd party intelligence as a backbone to our reality) logical intricacies embedded within.melancocky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:53 am 1. You had me at "the nature of the entity that constructs our reality." I am dying to know the relationship between my consciousness and reality (which would include the possible creator).
2. You lost me at the protocol and shoe stuff. I don't understand what you mean.
The example I gave was based on a primary principle of under.standing the logical intricacies - that of homophones.
The Spirit within you ALL is the Spirit-u-all One teaching you all. Through age, s(pirtual)-age that is, there is guidance and teaching, if only It is listened to. This tutor, through in-tuition with-in u all, is guiding you all with the light to en-light-en you all so that you all can be Truly up-lifted.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:10 pm...in other words - if we are in a system where a 3rd party intelligence 'constructs' our reality then, comprehend that our common form of communication around the world - English has logical intricacies embedded within it. (a sage taught me so).
'Think'-ing that "we" are a human body or somehow that that is who "we" are only drives that one further away from the Truth rather than towards It.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 12:27 pmRegarding, point 1 ..that's perhaps the biggest quest_ion we have.melancocky wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 11:53 am 1. You had me at "the nature of the entity that constructs our reality." I am dying to know the relationship between my consciousness and reality (which would include the possible creator).
David Chalmers I feel is the bloke balls in deep on this quest. I suggested to him that, just as an electronic component on a circuit board functions via its account of anode to cathode, that perhaps our consciousness - where we can feel a scratch on the back of our hand, is courtesy of our reality being input to our being back to dark matter\energy. It was a long shot, but he did suggest it may require just the right crazy idea!
I really think there is something far deeper to our ability to 'sense' than just a pile of biological matter, especially from my understanding of the 3rd party intelligence.
Perhaps for us to be conscious requires us to inhale from the light to the dark!
"You" must be a very smart person, from what you have made clear and informed us all of here. Congratulations.Logik wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 1:39 pm I am avoiding doing the soul-destroying work of completing my dry and boring masters thesis by pursuing things which are far more amusing to me.
Undermining "logicians" and "mathematicians". In the process I seem to be producing work that my supervisor says could easily translate into a PhD thesis. I think I have shot myself in the foot (or he is just playing me to get me to finish my original thesis).
I think bar-procrastination is far safer.
Wow, you must be even smarter than what you TRIED TO portray in your last post here.Logik wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:28 pmAn amusing distraction
My full-time job offers more than enough challenges and hard problems to fire up the neurons and is ahead of academia by a few decades.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:22 pm Apart from an art painting project which the sage has pretty much forced me to do, I write cyberpunk. My point being in relation to yours and said supervisor, is that external stimuli can be amazing to fire the neurons and take things on a different tack.
Even more insight given into even you did NOT realize just how smart you really are.Logik wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:28 pmAs a result academia offers absolute no new insight. In fact - more knowledge exists outside of the institution than in, so I am not sure who is doing who a favour at the moment. They should be paying ME for my insights.
My choice to become a student has (in hind sight) been a mistake.
Does that mean that you are ever more smarter, again?Logik wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:28 pmFor varying definitions of "educated". I am an autodidact.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:22 pm I'm not particularly well educated compared to many around here, but I think, and I could be wrong, that your thesis must be boring because it is constrained by way of being fixed in logic - perhaps computer science, not much room to move with new ideas?
And for others that is bragging and blowing (their own "trumpet"). A LOT of that gets done here. I am sure they must be happy now.Logik wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 2:28 pmComputer science is pretty much "the world is what you make it". Bar the hard problems (limits) imposed by physics.
Mathematics is largely a huge bag of solutions without problems...
Find what makes you happy and do a LOT of it. For some people that's hookers and blow.
WHY did you come to that conclusion? In other words what ASSUMPTION were you making to arrive at this wrong conclusion?attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:33 pmBy that statement, you must incur that humans have created our reality.Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:56 amThe nature of that Entity is in two parts/senses.attofishpi wrote: ↑Sun Mar 03, 2019 9:46 am
Well said. It's been a quest for us both, i'm sure, since we had the magnitude of thought to wonder why a ripple forms when we break the surface of a puddle with our feet.
At the stage I am at, I wonder what it is that is the nature of the entity that constructs our reality.
In the spiritual sense that Entity is the one and only OPEN Mind, Itself, which is what has allowed human beings to have imagined, and then create, ALL of what they have.
That is from your perspective/comprehension, but from my perspective/comprehension there is NO one "glove" that fits best. As there are Truth and falsities within all separate views/perspectives.attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:33 pmFrom my comprehension of the entity, Panentheism is still the glove that fits best.
Of course what is constructed, by intelligence, into physical matter can be seen, by the physical eyes. But what can NOT be seen by the physical eyes is the 'invisible intelligence', which has created physical "things". Although this can be SEEN/UNDERSTOOD, by the very thing that can NOT be seen, by the physical eyes. The invisible intelligence, within ALL, is what can SEE and UNDERSTAND ALL things. This is what KNOWS the Truth of ALL things.attofishpi wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 12:33 pmCertainly - reality, which I know is a construct of this 'God'\3rd party intelligence can be seen, but what any theist tends to fail to comprehend, is that it is also a key component of our consciousness, in that it knows every thought that passes through ones mind, it can force a thought to ones mind...in fact, if it decided it wanted you to go check the mail, you will do so, without even realising that it was not of your own will.Age wrote: ↑Mon Mar 04, 2019 11:56 amBoth parts are very natural and so they are the Nature of the Entity, Itself.
Some might refer to that Spiritual part/sense as God, but in order for "things" to be created then physicality is needed. The Universe, Itself, is what the Creator IS, and some might refer to this also as God.
God is One Entity made up of two parts. One can be physical seen the other can not. But both are needed to construct ONE reality, obviously.
IT already HAS ensured destiny. Destiny HAS been CREATED, and been ful(ly)filled.