Re: Who has more control of our thinking; God or Satan?
Posted: Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:33 am
You are not very bright because?Greatest I am wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:08 pmI agree that theists who are stuck in the supernatural are sick.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
You are not very bright because?Greatest I am wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:08 pmI agree that theists who are stuck in the supernatural are sick.
HexHammer wrote: ↑Sat Mar 09, 2019 2:33 amYou are not very bright because?Greatest I am wrote: ↑Thu Mar 07, 2019 2:08 pmI agree that theists who are stuck in the supernatural are sick.
It's okay -- once in a while we are sure to agree or like something about each other. We aren't locked into making a habit of it though.
The only argument I would have is stating 'satan' as if it is a separate entity. I can only speak of my experience of 'God' and I know it irks some people, but from what I have experienced, God is NOT all benevolent (as priests make out).Greta wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 9:41 am I'm thinking that we have two possibilities to ease away from Iron Age language:
1. God might be order and Satan, chaos.
However, since total order is stasis and, as far as we're concerned, stasis is not all that great, then.
2. God is a productive balance of order and chaos while Satan is imbalance - the extremes, being too wild or too controlled.
Might the experiences/ideas of "god(s)" be the "tapping into" and projection of the potential/extent of ones psychic and spirited reach? A natural energetic extension of ourselves individually and collectively with others? No other entity with an agenda. No other entity with desire or judgment. Such attributes/ideas are of humans.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:53 am I can only speak of my experience of 'God' and I know it irks some people, but from what I have experienced, God is NOT all benevolent (as priests make out).
No, my reasoning from the experiences allow me to ONLY comprehend that there is a 3rd party intelligence that constructs, in real time, our reality.Lacewing wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 3:42 pmMight the experiences/ideas of "god(s)" be the "tapping into" and projection of the potential/extent of ones psychic and spirited reach? A natural energetic extension of ourselves individually and collectively with others? No other entity with an agenda. No other entity with desire or judgment. Such attributes/ideas are of humans.attofishpi wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 10:53 am I can only speak of my experience of 'God' and I know it irks some people, but from what I have experienced, God is NOT all benevolent (as priests make out).
It does indeed.Lacewing wrote: ↑Tue Mar 19, 2019 9:36 pm What if God and Satan are one and the same? The only difference being how humans interpret and explain variances in energetic quality (for their own purposes). Humans define what is "good" and "bad", and establish figureheads lording over those categories, which they (the humans) can then align themselves or others with. Like a personal power trip or safety net... it serves humans. Nobody/nothing else cares.
Don't we all embody positive and negative attributes? Doesn't everything in nature create and destroy? Who defines which of those is good and bad? Why would there be a god who is "good" and a "devil" who is bad? In a human conflict, who decides which sides a god and devil are on?
It all sounds like primitive thinking, doesn't it?
I can appreciate your thinking here.Greta wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 9:41 am I'm thinking that we have two possibilities to ease away from Iron Age language:
1. God might be order and Satan, chaos.
However, since total order is stasis and, as far as we're concerned, stasis is not all that great, then.
2. God is a productive balance of order and chaos while Satan is imbalance - the extremes, being too wild or too controlled.
Then why do you always ask silly self explanatory questions? A sure sign of being mentally challenged!
Ideally, the religious would question whether the gaining of knowledge is a sin. They might consider that in Adam and Eve the ancients were simply creating an allegory for the powers of humanity beyond that of other animals, and the price we pay for that awareness in suffering.Greatest I am wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 5:57 pmI can appreciate your thinking here.Greta wrote: ↑Wed Mar 20, 2019 9:41 am I'm thinking that we have two possibilities to ease away from Iron Age language:
1. God might be order and Satan, chaos.
However, since total order is stasis and, as far as we're concerned, stasis is not all that great, then.
2. God is a productive balance of order and chaos while Satan is imbalance - the extremes, being too wild or too controlled.
To the religious, you are pointing out why they sing of Adam's sin being a happy fault and necessary to gods plan as sin produces law and the balance/security we all instinctively crave.
Easily. With their hand tied behind their back. "Every Christian lion-hearted man will show you."
We just don't know the religious. Whatever god says, can't be questioned. For the bulk of Christianity, you'd be burnt at the stakes for voicing this.Greta wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2019 9:59 pm
Ideally, the religious would question whether the gaining of knowledge is a sin. They might consider that in Adam and Eve the ancients were simply creating an allegory for the powers of humanity beyond that of other animals, and the price we pay for that awareness in suffering.
Question: were Adam and Eve Homo sapiens or an earlier hominid line like the Australopithecus - the latter logically would have already had basic human awareness and suffering because they adorned the graves of their dead.