Page 2 of 2
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Wed Apr 25, 2018 7:55 pm
by jayjacobus
John Brown's body has a log within its eye.
Jimmy Crack Corn and I don't care.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:09 pm
by Walker
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:14 pm
by jayjacobus
Mueller needs to have hard evidence. He cannot insinuate guilt (as is now done in the press). I want to be fair even if it pains me to do so.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:26 pm
by Walker
That’s your angle?
Read the article.
Mueller has plenty of hard evidence.
Only, it doesn’t go against Trump.
So he ignores it, and so does the media.
The angle reveals the purpose.
By any means necessary get the target, and everyone knows who that is.
The target sure as hell isn't truth.
And anyone with a brain knows it.
The media has much more important things to write about, like pussy.
Even some Dims are calling it a farce.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 6:08 pm
by jayjacobus
Walker wrote: ↑Thu Apr 26, 2018 5:26 pm
That’s your angle?
Read the article.
Mueller has plenty of hard evidence.
Only, it doesn’t go against Trump.
So he ignores it, and so does the media.
The angle reveals the purpose.
By any means necessary get the target, and everyone knows who that is.
The target sure as hell isn't truth.
And anyone with a brain knows it.
The media has much more important things to write about, like pussy.
Even some Dims are calling it a farce.
I don't care how you think.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Thu Apr 26, 2018 8:13 pm
by Walker
Apparently what you don't care for is truth and facts.
The question is, what are you doing on a philosophy forum, Corn Cracker?
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:02 am
by jayjacobus
Yes.
I read what you wrote.
It is really fantastical.
This is not to say it isn't true, but I don't know you at all.
I'm not sure you will tell me the truth.
But I see what you are doing.
You are gathering your followers.
I'm just not there.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 3:06 am
by Walker
The question is, why your compulsion to share your personal drivel?
That's a question for you to answer for yourself.
Maybe, finger exercises?
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:46 pm
by jayjacobus
I see, you are a student of insults but that prevents you from being a leader.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:31 pm
by Walker
jayjacobus wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:46 pm
I see, you are a student of insults but that prevents you from being a leader.
Sorry pal. That's your world.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 8:31 pm
by jayjacobus
Walker wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 2:31 pm
jayjacobus wrote: ↑Fri Apr 27, 2018 12:46 pm
I see, you are a student of insults but that prevents you from being a leader.
Sorry pal. That's your world.
To which we serve: CORPORATIONS.
Stormy Daniels has suggested the proposition that when Donald Trump did not sign his contract, it was not valid.
GO, Stormy. There are many contracts with corporations that the corporation did not sign. Did they not intended to abide by the contract?
Well, they will say that they had no obligations in the contract. Only I did.
Can that be LEGAL, no obligations? or can I make up obligations that I say they implied?
Why not?
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:22 pm
by jayjacobus
Let me cite the implied obligations of one corporation I worked for:
They implied I would be a member of a team, but I was more of an appendage.
They implied I would have satisfying work, but I had unpleasant and inappropriate work and not much work at all
They implied I would have opportunities. I never got an opportunity although they tried to force into a position I didn't want.
They implied that I would improve my reputation, but the work I got was less than noteworthy.
They implied (or I took for granted) that they would not harm my reputation, but my reputation was destroyed.
They may have implied more, but this shows their intent to harm me. Why? I don't know (but I have some guesses).
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:34 pm
by jayjacobus
Oh, and for you geniuses that wonder why I didn't leave, I had nothing to put on my resume and only had a sob story to tell.
I went to quite a few lawyers, but was turned down because no one had violated a contract, I had signed away my rights or I didn't suffer enough.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:50 pm
by jayjacobus
jayjacobus wrote: ↑Sun Apr 29, 2018 9:22 pm
Let me cite the implied obligations of one corporation I worked for:
They implied I would be a member of a team, but I was more of an appendage.
They implied I would have satisfying work, but I had unpleasant and inappropriate work and not much work at all
They implied I would have opportunities. I never got an opportunity although they tried to force into a position I didn't want.
They implied that I would improve my reputation, but the work I got was less than noteworthy.
They implied (or I took for granted) that they would not harm my reputation, but my reputation was destroyed.
They may have implied more, but this shows their intent to harm me. Why? I don't know (but I have some guesses).
One guess was there was someone behind the scenes who wanted me to fail and return to some fold but I don't know that.
Re: To That which we Serve
Posted: Sun May 27, 2018 5:51 am
by NajlaHara
People are buying that trump actually had relations with "Stormy Daniels"?
It's bread and circus.