Re: Is it true in the UK that you need a license to own a...
Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2017 8:43 pm
About as sacred as your ass!Harbal wrote:The BBC is sacred.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
About as sacred as your ass!Harbal wrote:The BBC is sacred.
Correct, and the perpetrators of both should be subject to criminal prosecution.uwot wrote:No. It's perfectly legal, but the person being circumcised has no say in the matter. A bit like abortion.bobevenson wrote:Are you saying that circumcision is illegal in England?uwot wrote:We don't have the end of our willies chopped off at birth.
You're an American, I wouldn't expect you to understand.bobevenson wrote:About as sacred as your ass!Harbal wrote:The BBC is sacred.
I understand the tyranny of your country and the brainwashing of its citizens all too well! BBC America, which I imagine is controlled by the BBC, even censors that great movie "The Shining."Harbal wrote:You're an American, I wouldn't expect you to understand.bobevenson wrote:About as sacred as your ass!Harbal wrote:The BBC is sacred.
You haven't got a clue, bob, you've been brought up in the "American Way", you poor bastard.bobevenson wrote: I understand the tyranny of your country and the brainwashing of its citizens all too well! BBC America, which I imagine is controlled by the BBC, even censors that great movie "The Shining."
I'm telling you, bob, not arguing with you.bobevenson wrote:Can't refute my argument, huh?
Perfect, eh. Why thank you, bob.bobevenson wrote:You're a perfect example of a brainwashed limey.
Why's that, Reverend Bob? Do you think I have no need, or are you testing the market for some you wish to sell?bobevenson wrote:Not for large balls either, I assume.uwot wrote:I am not currently in the market for large bells.
This again!! Once again you imagine wrongly boob, BBC America is controlled by Americans, hence you censor stuff.bobevenson wrote:... which I imagine is controlled by the BBC, even censors that great movie "The Shining."
Not quite, they could detect an old TV's in use as they picked up the oscillator's signal but it was useless in pin-pointing if there were a few TVs in the vicinity so effectively useless as detectors.attofishpi wrote:...
I thought to myself what a load of bollocks - these vans can't detect TVs - TVs are a receiver, not a broadcaster...later in life i read somewhere that indeed it was all bullshit.
No, I meant your utter audacity implies no need for larger ones.uwot wrote:Why's that, Reverend Bob? Do you think I have no need, or are you testing the market for some you wish to sell?bobevenson wrote:Not for large balls either, I assume.uwot wrote:I am not currently in the market for large bells.