thedoc wrote:I am willing to accept that others can be wrong, and there is nothing I can do about it
Be "wrong" about what? Believing in the god you do?
So, going back to a question I asked before... do you think that the "real world" and "reality" (as you put it) for everyone includes the god you believe in, whether they see it or not?
thedoc wrote:And yes, many people see the evidence of God but reject it and refuse to see it.
Rather than "evidence", I think there are personal experiences which may be very real for an individual and that may steer them in believing one thing or another.
It seems odd to say that many people see evidence of a god but reject it. I don't think that's what is typically going on. I don't think it's some sort of willful denial... and I wonder why a theist would want to see non-theists that way? Is it because such a conclusion denies awareness that there could be any other possibility than a god? In other words, such a conclusion insists that a god exists for everyone, therefore people who aren't noticing it must be refusing it.
There are theists, however, who have acknowledged -- and surely some who secretly suspect -- that there is (or might be) no god for them. But they need to carry on with that belief/lifestyle -- just as any person who becomes attached to certain beliefs about ANYTHING and will continue those beliefs because they don't know how to live/function outside of what is familiar to them, even when much to the contrary of their belief is right in front of them.
thedoc wrote:Universe can be seen as evidence for God's existence
The universe can be seen as a lot of things. Simply attributing it to a god is not "evidence" of that god's existence.
thedoc wrote:Do you see a payoff for yourself by preaching that there is no God?
Do you see me as preaching??? I thought I was just offering another point of view. I don't tell other people not to believe in a god. I think everyone should do whatever suits them. I don't think other people should tell me that their god is part of my reality whether I believe it or not. That's presumptuous and imposing. You, doc, are a nice theist who walks their talk... but there are many theists who are not like that at all. They spew hatred while screaming about their association with a god. And that demonstrates how it can be made up on an individual basis. Some use the god concept to do good and be the best of themselves... some use it to justify or to conceal or deny their "evil"... and some use it to glorify themselves. It's whatever a person makes it into... and there are countless creative variations of it!
Most theists
want their version of God to be acknowledged as the ultimate truth over all people... and yet they don't seem able to acknowledge how unrealistic that is (considering all the versions)... and yes, I think there's certainly a personal payoff in positioning oneself with ultimate truth.
Why couldn't it be possible that there are many "earth-based" realities... ALL equally "realistic" and/or viable while we're here? And why couldn't it make sense that our attempts to extend our earth-based realities BEYOND that, are little more than fanciful imaginings of sweet little dreamers who can dream up many, many things?

Is it offensive or threatening to suggest that we have such limitations?