Page 2 of 6

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Fri Jan 15, 2016 5:40 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Walker wrote:
Obvious Leo wrote:Those lads are fucking lucky that they were captured by a civilised nation like Iran which does not spirit its captives away into overseas concentration camps and then subject them to years of torture without charging them with any crime.
"Iran has announced that it will be holding a cartoon contest aimed at creating caricatures denying the Holocaust. This year, the contest's grand prize has been increased from $12,000 to $50,000."

http://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/20 ... n-contest/
This is irrelevant, but since you mention it....

They are obviously trying to follow the example set by the USA that has been in denial about too many things to mantion, including its loosing wars in Korea and Vietnam, illegal detention, torture, political assassination, destruction of democracies all over the world, and overt and covert regime change.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:08 am
by Walker
Iran’s cartoon contest is an example of Iran’s focused lying, for propaganda purposes, thus evidence of their predisposition.
BigWhit wrote: But no, as far as I was trained we were only to give what the convention states we must and absolutely no more. This case is slightly different. They were in the wrong for being in Iranian territorial waters.
Ah. Rationality. A non-flame-throwing response. BigWhit is obviously a rational thinker.

Rationality …

The POTUS is a civilian, and the top commander of U.S. military forces. In the instance of the detained and humiliated sailors, evidence strongly suggests that the Rule of Law was followed, for these reasons.

The U.S. boat was seized just prior to The POTUS state of the union address. Unlikely a coincidence. The seizure was for propaganda purposes. It’s unlikely that an Annapolis-trained officer would have drifted so far off course or purposely taken a route challenging the line of Iranian space.

It’s likely that the crew saw trouble coming and requested orders. It’s likely the orders they received were to break military procedure, to surrender control of the vessel, to cooperate fully with the military force of a foreign nation, and to do and say everything they were told while at gunpoint.

British military is instructed to cooperate with rogue terrorists because the world understands that terrorists don’t follow rules, and because statements made by captives at terrorist gunpoint are obviously coerced bs.

Military personel in uniform of their country are not spies, no matter where they are.

It is unlikely that U.S. naval officers originated the decision to drop the protocol of name, rank, and serial number. Likely the decision came from the civilian head of the military, trickled down to civilian representatives with the authority to speak for the POTUS. Either this decision was specific to the incident, or the decision is in the rules of engagement.

In this case the Rule of Law was followed. The captain broke the training of name, rank and serial number as ordered. To maintain a public semblance of military procedure, the boat captain will be investigated, but in today’s kinder, gentler navy, the smart course will be to let him retain his career if he plays ball and keeps his mouth shut. In another less gentle time he would have been hung by the neck to shut him up, but in another time he likely would not have received such orders.

Many countries surround those waters. I wouldn't be surprised to hear that the U.S. boat was escorted into Iranian waters.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:17 am
by BigWhit
We will know what the Navy wants us to know at the end of the inveatigation. I wouldn't expect this to be the end of his career but it may not look good for promotion. Anything we can say without evidence is speculation and I am not inclined to gossip.

:wink:

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 4:21 am
by Walker
Correct. Thank you for this emphasis.

All inferences are on analysis of what we are told, thus the care in the use of the words "likely," and "unlikely."

After all, we are landlocked here, not on site, and what the hell do I know anyway.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:31 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Walker wrote:Iran’s cartoon contest is an example of Iran’s focused lying, for propaganda purposes, thus evidence of their predisposition.
The Republican Primaries and Obama's State of the Nation address does much the same thing.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 12:11 am
by Obvious Leo
Walker wrote:what the hell do I know anyway.
You seem to have managed to make an exhaustive analysis of this event on the basis of information which originated entirely from within your own mind so I see no reason whatsoever why you should allow any inconvenient facts to fuck up your story. You are a shining example of American geo-political exceptionalism.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:56 am
by Walker
You don’t get to wait and see what someone else tells you to think on this current event, boys. The analysis is proving true already.

Hobbes, Leo, Iran … all in agreement.

And the propaganda begins…

http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... er-arrest/

How’s it feel to be a sheep?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: (on a scale of 4)

Too rich.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:03 am
by Walker
Lost at sea without your marching orders. So sad.

Could it be we're zeroing in on the evil of this situation?

Say it ain't true. I feel so disillusioned.

And that's a good thing, to lose illusion.

To see you for who you are.

The United Kingdom used to filled with brave men. What the hell happened.

Sheep. You really should be ashamed, spreading your lying filth.

:cry: :cry:

Sold out England, and pissing on anyone who doesn't sell out their country too.

That's what the hell I know ... now.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 8:32 am
by Walker
Rule of Man

Rationality gets rationality returned.

Shit gets shit returned, even though the shit smearers are so practiced.

Choose your fucking game.

Practice makes perfect.

Let's all get down and crawl together.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:29 am
by Bill Wiltrack
.





Not bad.


I like your style.






.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 10:56 am
by Walker
Bill Wiltrack wrote:.





Not bad.


I like your style.






.

Why thank you, sir.

After all we are civilized, are we not?

We play by the rules.

Folks choose their rules.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 1:40 pm
by Hobbes' Choice
Walker wrote:You don’t get to wait and see what someone else tells you to think on this current event, boys. The analysis is proving true already.

Hobbes, Leo, Iran … all in agreement.

And the propaganda begins…

http://freebeacon.com/national-security ... er-arrest/

How’s it feel to be a sheep?

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: (on a scale of 4)

Too rich.
Boo fucking Hoo. American looses a major propaganda battle.
Why the fuck should I care?
I don't see Iran as worse that the US.
US sends its service personnel into danger, disrespecting the sovereignty of Iran, of the eve of the drop of sanctions and we are supposed to support the USA.
Fuck the hell off moron!

Ethnocentrism robs people of their reason, its a disease and you have a bad dose.

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Sun Jan 17, 2016 2:31 pm
by Walker
Sigh. Same old same old song. Tin ear.
Hobbes wrote:Boo fucking Hoo
You misspelled. Should be Baaaa fucking Baaaaa.

(btw: you're not god are you?

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 3:38 am
by BigWhit
It should be expected that Iran would run around with their cocks in their hands shouting about how great they are. But it only shows their insecurity in their power. They'll be singing a different tune if it ever comes to a real war (I hope it doesn't, not because I fear Iran, but I'm fucking sick of war).

The Obama administration's handling of the event only goes as further evidence of Obama's weakness. I could not accurately describe my hatred of "Fox News" but the retired general had it right; Obama is a "pussy."

Re: Rule of Man ... Rule of Law

Posted: Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:55 am
by Hobbes' Choice
BigWhit wrote:It should be expected that Iran would run around with their cocks in their hands shouting about how great they are. But it only shows their insecurity in their power. They'll be singing a different tune if it ever comes to a real war (I hope it doesn't, not because I fear Iran, but I'm fucking sick of war).

The Obama administration's handling of the event only goes as further evidence of Obama's weakness. I could not accurately describe my hatred of "Fox News" but the retired general had it right; Obama is a "pussy."
This all makes you look pretty fucking stupid.

You might be sick of war but why is your country trying to start a war with Iran every fucking day, by sending boats full of American soldiers into Iranian water.

http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/n ... -223937937

If you weren't such an ethnocentric p**** you would be able to see, what every non American is seeing in the world,
IT is THE US THAT HAS ITS COCK IN ITS HAND pissing over the rest of the world.

Iran is open to nuclear inspections. And sanctions have been dropped. If you don't want war then this is a result for which you have to give Obama praise.
Fact is you are just moronically confused.