Philosophy Now Forum

manden wrote:
Next question , please .

Have you ever been forcibly detained in a mental institution?

That means nothing - there is no other human possibilty than to use a gender . We don't know about .

Harbal wrote:

manden wrote:
Next question , please .

Have you ever been forcibly detained in a mental institution?

You , how often ?

Sorry , it did not help much .

manden wrote:That means nothing - there is no other human possibilty than to use a gender . We don't know about .

You could say God "him/her/itself", signifying that we don't know the gender of God or that God is perhaps genderless.

MORE OF HIMSELF IS NOT RECOGNIZABLE ! Can't you understand that ?

Again, you are implying male gender. Is God male?

If we don't know God's gender then it sounds like it would be more accurate to say something like "more of God is not recognizable". Remember you were the one who insisted on being "logical". It doesn't seem "logical" to be ambiguous in our terminology when talking about God.

manden wrote:MORE OF HIMSELF IS NOT RECOGNIZABLE

Since you don't know anything about God or the creation, questions are rather pointless, aren't they?

FYI, Man invented the ideas of logic and morals, but they really screwed both of them up.

Sorry , I have nothing to add , You are blocked , that is your problem , you must solve it .

If you are further , we can continue in the next days . First you must solve your problem - I think religious or human indoctrination .

Bye .

manden wrote:Sorry , I have nothing to add , You are blocked , that is your problem , you must solve it .

If you are further , we can continue in the next days . First you must solve your problem - I think religious or human indoctrination .

Bye .

I feel perfectly fine. What am I "blocked" from?

thedoc wrote:

manden wrote:MORE OF HIMSELF IS NOT RECOGNIZABLE

Since you don't know anything about God or the creation, questions are rather pointless, aren't they?

FYI, Man invented the ideas of logic and morals, but they really screwed both of them up.

I know much about the real creator of the universe , you not .

Gary Childress wrote:

manden wrote:Sorry , I have nothing to add , You are blocked , that is your problem , you must solve it .

If you are further , we can continue in the next days . First you must solve your problem - I think religious or human indoctrination .

Bye .

I feel perfectly fine. What am I "blocked" from?

How often shall I give the same answer , and you cannot understand . Is that not blocked ?

manden wrote:

Gary Childress wrote:

manden wrote:Sorry , I have nothing to add , You are blocked , that is your problem , you must solve it .

If you are further , we can continue in the next days . First you must solve your problem - I think religious or human indoctrination .

Bye .

I feel perfectly fine. What am I "blocked" from?

How often shall I give the same answer , and you cannot understand . Is that not blocked ?

What can I not understand?

MORE OF HIMSELF IS NOT RECOGNIZABLE !

manden wrote:MORE OF HIMSELF IS NOT RECOGNIZABLE !

That's wonderful but you are again using the term "himself" which implies you know God's gender. Is God male?

Equal what I write (I can only write under human conditions) we can know from the creator himself nothing but that he is the creator of the

universe and what follows out of this .