attofishpi wrote:
You mean when they were reduced to second rate citizens - dhimmis.
There were citizens in those days? They were also viziers and whilst definitely subject to constraints the Jews at least we're a damned sight better off under the Ottomans than they were under Christian Spain, it's why they fled there. Do at least a Wiki read on Christians and Jews under the Ottomans and learn something. In fact look up what dhimmis involved.
Anything to say about Indonesia?
The fact is that your claim that Jews and Christians cannot live under Islam is historically and currently wrong.
Blaming religion for Hitler now?
No. You saying the Germans weren't Christian?
I'm arguing from a purely secular standpoint, whats all this buy bull shit?
What was all that Quaranic shiite then?
The survey was done by the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. I have no doubt it was conducted with no bias, simply as they stated, 86% of those surveyed in mosques in Australia stated they WANT sharia law to be imposed in Australia.
Post the link.
You know sweet FA about what it truly means to be a Christian.
Show me where Christ said to kill others in self-defense?
]Blaming Christians again for Hitler?
You think Hitler rounded up all the Jews do you? What a busy boy he was. Where were all the Christian neighbours when the homosexuals, handicapped and Jews were being rounded up?
You lack any true appreciation of what being taught to hate and kill via a 'divine' leader can have on an entire 'brotherhood'.
You're a fucking idiot but given you're also a godbothering one I can well understand your insight. Why do you think I told you to read Mao, and whilst you're at it Lenin, as they want idiots like you to start tarring all Muslims as then they get attacked and threatened by other idiots which forces them into the radicals camp. Revolutionary handbook 101.
So you would be happy to have me stand against a wall so you can shoot me?
If it meant an end to godbothering loons promoting hatred in the face of the facts, yup.
This is not a 'Christian' v 'Muslim' argument. Consider me atheist for the sake of this argument.
But you're not are you. If you were you wouldn't be promoting the idea that Christians and Jews can't live under Islam in the face of the fact that in one of the most populous Islamic countries they do do exactly that.
UK average birth rates:- Muslims 8.1 children. Non muslim 1.3
The most common name for boys in the UK is now Mohamad.
http://www.loonwatch.com/2012/09/10-myt ... -the-west/
2 and 10 are just for you. Although I reckon all of it will apply to you.
Good. Just wanting to make people realise that Islam having direct instruction from a 'divine' leader to go about murdering and converting, Islam IS radical.
Like the Pope you mean. Good job Islam doesn't have such a leader then.
Biased? Accounts of people that have left Islam, or have been victims of its encroachment is just bias?
Look up the accounts of what the Christians militias got up to in Lebanon.
The irony now is that they are teaming up with Hezbolah to fight ISIS. Where does that fit in your thoughts?
Its imperative to hear accounts of this barabaric religion when it takes hold of an area, the video link i posted regarding Brigitte Gabriels account of what happended to her home in Lebanon in the early 70s is a must watch.
So is what the Christian militias got up to. What's imperative is to report the news in an unbiased fashion but unfortunately in the age of the internut and pay per view this is no longer posible. People just want their safe - space news as they like it.