Philosophy Now Forum

.









..........................................................










.

What are you babbling on about now bob?

In the policy you described, that is, only in direct defense you will only be fighting a foe who thinks themselves as heavily armed as you and since you say you'll only be fighting in direct defense then it's likely you've already been attacked so there is a real possibility you'll be facing ground troops and from the sounds of it you'll be well and truly fucked then. What do you actually mean by 'direct defense'?

No idea why you thought I'd think you'd be defending us as your policy appeared to be clear.

Arising_uk wrote:In the policy you described, that is, only in direct defense you will only be fighting a foe who thinks themselves as heavily armed as you and since you say you'll only be fighting in direct defense then it's likely you've already been attacked so there is a real possibility you'll be facing ground troops and from the sounds of it you'll be well and truly fucked then. What do you actually mean by 'direct defense'?

No, we won't be protecting you or the rest of this godforsaken world. We will only be looking after our own interests, whether they be military or economic, and will take whatever action is immediately necessary to fully protect our interests. The rest of you bastards can go straight to hell after you've annihilated each other.

What's it like holding these conversations with yourself in your head bobby? Fun?

No idea were you get this 'we' from as it's just you in your bedroom.

Still, thank you for once against demonstrating the super - powers of the internut.

Arising_uk wrote:What's it like holding these conversations with yourself in your head bobby? Fun? No idea were you get this 'we' from as it's just you in your bedroom. Still, thank you for once against demonstrating the super - powers of the internut.

You're just too fucking dense (I guess you would use the word "to") to understand (I guess you would use the word "too") the AEP is a theoretical concept, even though I've pounded it into your head so many times, you must be cross-eyed by now.

Wasn't saying it wasn't bobby, just that the 'we' is imaginary as it's just you in your basement and that's where it'll be staying as you are incapable of philosophically examining your construct which is why your construct never gets anywhere other than you repeating the same old half-dozen statements ad - nauseum. Actually I'll correct that as over the years what I've noticed that what you actually do is wait until a few new members join and then trot them out and the result is always the same, you refusing to consider any critique of them and then just calling anyone who does raise a reasonable point stupid. You are the epitome of the internut and I have no idea why the mod hasn't banned you as you have run your course upon this philosophy forum a long time ago.

Arising_uk wrote:Wasn't saying it wasn't bobby, just that the 'we' is imaginary as it's just you in your basement and that's where it'll be staying as you are incapable of philosophically examining your construct which is why your construct never gets anywhere other than you repeating the same old half-dozen statements ad - nauseum. Actually I'll correct that as over the years what I've noticed that what you actually do is wait until a few new members join and then trot them out and the result is always the same, you refusing to consider any critique of them and then just calling anyone who does raise a reasonable point stupid. You are the epitome of the internut and I have no idea why the mod hasn't banned you as you have run your course upon this philosophy forum a long time ago.

Jesus Christ, nobody has ever raised a reasonable point against any argument I've ever presented, much less the likes of you, who just keeps coming back with stupid and meaningless remarks ad nauseam! P.S., you're an insult to philosophy.

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:Wasn't saying it wasn't bobby, just that the 'we' is imaginary as it's just you in your basement and that's where it'll be staying as you are incapable of philosophically examining your construct which is why your construct never gets anywhere other than you repeating the same old half-dozen statements ad - nauseum. Actually I'll correct that as over the years what I've noticed that what you actually do is wait until a few new members join and then trot them out and the result is always the same, you refusing to consider any critique of them and then just calling anyone who does raise a reasonable point stupid. You are the epitome of the internut and I have no idea why the mod hasn't banned you as you have run your course upon this philosophy forum a long time ago.

Jesus Christ, nobody has ever raised a reasonable point against any argument I've ever presented, much less the likes of you, who just keeps coming back with stupid and meaningless remarks ad nauseam! P.S., you're an insult to philosophy.

You do not , have not, and cannot seem to offer any arguments at all.
All you offer is mean minded, reactionary bigoted bullshit from whatever cesspit your fetid mind was spawned.
You have nothing to offer, and nothing worthy to say.

If you think we are an insult to a philosophy site, then fuck off and find another one, and leave us in peace free from your rantings and violence.

Hobbes' Choice wrote:If you think we are an insult to philosophy...

Actually, I was just referring to Arising, but on second thought, I guess I'll add you and everybody else in this forum who disagrees with me.

bobevenson wrote:

Hobbes' Choice wrote:If you think we are an insult to philosophy...

Actually, I was just referring to Arising, but on second thought, I guess I'll add you and everybody else in this forum who disagrees with me.

Great!!!

If you think we are an insult to a philosophy site, then fuck off and find another one,

When you are you going to fuck off?

bobevenson wrote: ... and everybody else in this forum who disagrees with me.

And there you have it folks!! Straight from the horse's arse

What you don't get about Philosophy or philosophy forums bobby is that people may not disagree with one but still can raise objections to one's thoughts and reasoning, it's called philosophising abd the point is to refine and clarify ideas and the people who do it can be called philosophers but you obviously do not wish this. Why you are is is anyone's guess and mine is that you wish to be a Gnu, so that's you and Bill now.

.








..................................................................







.