Page 2 of 8

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 6:43 pm
by bobevenson
uwot wrote:
bobevenson wrote:...under the AEP, the government does not own, operate support or promote anything.
Reverend Bob, I was so hoping you'd be new type of divinely inspired prophet; one that speaks clearly and consistently. Oh well. So how should I interpret the above?
You remind me of John on the isle Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in the year 96AD. I'm sure all his friends and associates said, "What the fuck are you talking about."

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 7:49 pm
by Arising_uk
:lol: You think he had friends.

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Mon Dec 28, 2015 8:20 pm
by bobevenson
Arising_uk wrote::lol: You think he had friends.
Maybe not, but anybody reading his manuscript would have asked, "What the fuck are you talking about?"

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 2:54 am
by Arising_uk
Funnily enough I doubt this as at the time there would have been many such nutjobs making apocalyptical pronouncements and the metaphorical language they used would probably have been fairly common currency.

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 7:23 pm
by Hobbes' Choice

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:29 pm
by bobevenson
Who the fuck are you, Philosophy Explorer in disguise? I don't read fucking links. If you got something to say, say it!

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Tue Dec 29, 2015 11:34 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote:
Who the fuck are you, Philosophy Explorer in disguise? I don't read fucking links. If you got something to say, say it!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

PhilX

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 12:27 am
by Hobbes' Choice
Philosophy Explorer wrote:
bobevenson wrote:
Who the fuck are you, Philosophy Explorer in disguise? I don't read fucking links. If you got something to say, say it!
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

PhilX

:lol:

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 8:56 am
by uwot
bobevenson wrote:You remind me of John on the isle Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in the year 96AD. I'm sure all his friends and associates said, "What the fuck are you talking about."
But Reverend Bob, you're the prophet. It's true that sometimes people don't know what the fuck I am talking about; as a rule I will try and clarify, but some people are just beyond hope, don't you find? Anyway, people are still wondering what the fuck the author of Revelation was talking about, even who he was. So what's your take Reverend Bob? Are you a futurist, a historicist, an idealist or something else?

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:49 pm
by bobevenson
uwot wrote:
bobevenson wrote:You remind me of John on the isle Patmos, who wrote the book of Revelation in the year 96AD. I'm sure all his friends and associates said, "What the fuck are you talking about."
But Reverend Bob, you're the prophet. It's true that sometimes people don't know what the fuck I am talking about; as a rule I will try and clarify, but some people are just beyond hope, don't you find? Anyway, people are still wondering what the fuck the author of Revelation was talking about, even who he was. So what's your take Reverend Bob? Are you a futurist, a historicist, an idealist or something else?
No, my friend, although I'm a prophet, so was John on the isle of Patmos, and "The Ouzo Prophecy" provides clarification of the book of Revelation. Both are divinely inspired utterances dealing with the past, present and future.

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 3:55 pm
by uwot
I don't doubt it Reverend Bob. Exciting news! I've just discovered that my street has 7 hills (well, speed bumps), so has Cincinnati! Should I take it as a sign?

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:04 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
uwot wrote:I don't doubt it Reverend Bob. Exciting news! I've just discovered that my street has 7 hills (well, speed bumps), so has Cincinnati! Should I take it as a sign?
Only if a phrenologist says so. :lol:

PhilX

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:13 pm
by bobevenson
uwot wrote:I don't doubt it Reverend Bob. Exciting news! I've just discovered that my street has 7 hills (well, speed bumps), so has Cincinnati! Should I take it as a sign?
No, I'm afraid the only divinely inspired connection to the seven hills of ancient Rome, referred to as Babylon the queen in the book of Revelation, is Cincinnati, also referred to as the Queen City, and I was able to discover the first appearance of this nickname in 20 minutes, something the rest of the world couldn't discover in 170 years, in a description that could have been taken directly out of the book of Revelation.

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:17 pm
by uwot
Aw well. What was Babylon referred to by John. My guess is Eastbourne.

Re: No Legal Expenses Under the AEP

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 4:29 pm
by bobevenson
uwot wrote:Aw well. What was Babylon referred to by John. My guess is Eastbourne.
I'm sorry, at this point you seem to be talking total nonsense.