Page 2 of 3
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:27 pm
by bobevenson
Lacewing wrote:bobevenson wrote:Of course triplets would each have a vote, and it would be cast by one of their parents. As they are growing up, the parents would remain their surrogate until the parents decide they can vote on their own. This is how things would be properly handled under the AEP.
Are you assuming that the mother and father stay married and/or agree on everything? What planet is that? What if the mother and father belong to differing parties -- then who decides which way the triplet babies vote? What if the babies would prefer to exercise their right NOT to vote... and then they grow up being pissed off that they were used as a pawn by their deluded parent for political purposes that the baby would have opposed? Would orphanages get to vote for all the orphans in their care?
As the AEP says, one person, one vote. If you've got a fucking problem with that, too fucking bad. If there's a problem deciding who will represent the children, the legal system can make that decision. Jesus Christ, can't you see the big picture rather than bring up every stupid piddly point you're so famous for?
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:33 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote:Lacewing wrote:bobevenson wrote:Of course triplets would each have a vote, and it would be cast by one of their parents. As they are growing up, the parents would remain their surrogate until the parents decide they can vote on their own. This is how things would be properly handled under the AEP.
Are you assuming that the mother and father stay married and/or agree on everything? What planet is that? What if the mother and father belong to differing parties -- then who decides which way the triplet babies vote? What if the babies would prefer to exercise their right NOT to vote... and then they grow up being pissed off that they were used as a pawn by their deluded parent for political purposes that the baby would have opposed? Would orphanages get to vote for all the orphans in their care?
As the AEP says, one person, one vote. If you've got a fucking problem with that, too fucking bad. If there's a problem deciding who will represent the children, the legal system can make that decision. Jesus Christ, can't you see the big picture rather than bring up every stupid piddly point you're so famous for?
The legal system is overburdened as it is with nonsense cases.
PhilX
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:34 pm
by bobevenson
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Sounds like vote buying.
What's wrong with vote buying, you fucking Communist.
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:35 pm
by Lacewing
Okay, so the legal system can take on the task of handling all voting disputes in families, and if children don't like the way their parents are voting for them, they can run away from home. This just keeps getting better and better in Bizarro Bob's Mad Mad World of Complete Chaos and Nonsense.
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:36 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote:Philosophy Explorer wrote:Sounds like vote buying.
What's wrong with vote buying, you fucking Communist.
Look Boob, you're the one proposing communism with your BS proxy system.
That reminds me. When did your parents allow you to vote?
PhilX
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:39 pm
by bobevenson
Quit talking nonsense, idiot. Go back to The Lounge where you belong!
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:51 pm
by Dalek Prime
bobevenson wrote:Dalek Prime wrote:bobevenson wrote:Everybody under the political control of a government has an inalienable right to vote. This includes everybody, regardless of physical or mental ability. If unable to vote, a surrogate should be appointed, for instance, the parent of a baby in utero.
Fuck you. A parent gets more than one vote, twat?
Unfortunately, you don't know what the fuck you're talking about. What do you even mean, a parent gets more than one vote. The second, third, fourth or whatever the number of children he has, are being represented by those votes, as goddamn well they should, you fucking Socialist!
Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Mon Oct 12, 2015 11:57 pm
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote:Quit talking nonsense, idiot. Go back to The Lounge where you belong!
Fuck you Boob. Since you've visited my threads in the Lounge, I'm entitled to do the same here and let me remind you dolt, I created this thread so why don't you go back to another forum where you came from, loser?
PhilX
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:17 am
by Lacewing
I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting.
Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:20 am
by Philosophy Explorer
Lacewing wrote: I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting.
Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
I think the term is crackpot.
PhilX
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:37 am
by Lacewing
Philosophy Explorer wrote:Lacewing wrote:Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
I think the term is crackpot.
Okay, maybe I was too harsh. But sometimes I can't help but wonder how deep/extreme it goes!
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:44 am
by vegetariantaxidermy
Dalek Prime wrote:
Fuck you Bob. Octomom gets nine votes, the fat ignorant slob? People get extra votes because they consume more resources after fucking their filthy asses off? Up yours.
You would be 'fat' too if you had 8 children. She's not even fat.
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 12:59 am
by bobevenson
Lacewing wrote: I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting.
Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
Listen, you giggling bitch, not only are all of my ideas good, they're divinely inspired!
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 1:04 am
by Lacewing
Re: Who should be denied choice?
Posted: Tue Oct 13, 2015 1:11 am
by Philosophy Explorer
bobevenson wrote:Lacewing wrote: I'm giggling so much my sides are hurting.
Bob, do you have any GOOD ideas... or just insane ones?
Listen, you giggling bitch, not only are all of my ideas good, they're divinely inspired!
Yeah, he gets them out of a Cracker Jack box.
PhilX