Philosophy Now Forum

Greatest I am wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Theology jumps to invisible and imaginary Gods but philosophy can only jump to logic and reason. That is why it is superior to theology. It forces thought instead of the escape into fantasy.

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL

Quotes are all very well to an imp that is logicless.

attofishpi

No life today eh?

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:attofishpi

No life today eh?

Regards
DL

Puddles from my tears have more depth than the likes of you.

Greatest I am wrote:

Just not sure why we allow PhilX the depths that we fathom...when we know PhilX is a surface mutant.

attofishpi wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:

Just not sure why we allow PhilX the depths that we fathom...when we know PhilX is a surface mutant.

You're such a shithead with your attitude, asshole, which everybody knows. Do you come from the same school as Hex?

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

attofishpi wrote:

Greatest I am wrote:

Just not sure why we allow PhilX the depths that we fathom...when we know PhilX is a surface mutant.

You're such a shithead with your attitude, asshole, which everybody knows. Do you come from the same school as Hex?

PhilX

PhilX - you wouldn't make such a statement if you truly believed i was such. Fact is, im as down to earth as they come, and i can take any crap that anyone here on this forum wishes to push my way. If you cant take that shit here then you are truly going to have a hard time in the corporate crap world that we have been forced to be part of.
This is a philosophy forum ...and all i see from you is questions based on linked posts where you ask us what WE THINK. Who gives a fuck what WE THINK?
We want to know what YOU think based on your 'pulling of the data' from the internetz...otherwise its pointless and redundant. You are intelligent...take some drugs, fuck some hookers and experience the REAL ETHER that is reality...maybe then those around you will find your LIFE STORIES interesting!!!

Dam it.

You gave what he sought.

Character manipulation is his stock and trade .

His trolling piece of bait caught you.

Regards
DL

Greatest I am wrote:Dam it.

You gave what he sought.

Character manipulation is his stock and trade .

His trolling piece of bait caught you.

Regards
DL

lol.

attofishpi wrote: PhilX - you wouldn't make such a statement if you truly believed i was such. Fact is, im as down to earth as they come, and i can take any crap that anyone here on this forum wishes to push my way. If you cant take that shit here then you are truly going to have a hard time in the corporate crap world that we have been forced to be part of.
This is a philosophy forum ...and all i see from you is questions based on linked posts where you ask us what WE THINK. Who gives a fuck what WE THINK?
We want to know what YOU think based on your 'pulling of the data' from the internetz...otherwise its pointless and redundant. You are intelligent...take some drugs, fuck some hookers and experience the REAL ETHER that is reality...maybe then those around you will find your LIFE STORIES interesting!!!

I live in the land of the free. No one forces me. If you don't care what people think, then what are you doing here?

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

attofishpi wrote: PhilX - you wouldn't make such a statement if you truly believed i was such. Fact is, im as down to earth as they come, and i can take any crap that anyone here on this forum wishes to push my way. If you cant take that shit here then you are truly going to have a hard time in the corporate crap world that we have been forced to be part of.
This is a philosophy forum ...and all i see from you is questions based on linked posts where you ask us what WE THINK. Who gives a fuck what WE THINK?
We want to know what YOU think based on your 'pulling of the data' from the internetz...otherwise its pointless and redundant. You are intelligent...take some drugs, fuck some hookers and experience the REAL ETHER that is reality...maybe then those around you will find your LIFE STORIES interesting!!!

I live in the land of the free. No one forces me. If you don't care what people think, then what are you doing here?

PhilX

Wot? The entire reason of my premise is that i give a flying f*ck.

Greatest I am wrote:

HexHammer wrote:Neither should be favored, both are guesswork and jumping to conclusions, but a tard like PE wouldn't understand.

Theology jumps to invisible and imaginary Gods but philosophy can only jump to logic and reason. That is why it is superior to theology. It forces thought instead of the escape into fantasy.

Martin Luther.
“Faith must trample under foot all reason, sense, and understanding.”
“Reason is a whore, the greatest enemy that faith has.”

Regards
DL

Then you are quite ignorant about philosphy, Greeks had this weird term "spontanious genesis", when fish suddenly appeard in desolate lakes, where no streams could have led other fish to spawn there.
Philosophy are just as riddled with supersticion as religion, logic and reason are faulty if it's made by deluded people, and "deluded" is a commonly used term about philosophers by other philosophers that are clueless and babbles and raves.
..so, you don't know what you are talking about.

Philosophy Explorer wrote:In the US it certainly is. Both are belief systems, yet excuses are more readily made when it comes to religion as this article explains:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... hilosophy/

PhilX

Should religion be favored over philosophy?This can have no correct answer. It would depend upon how you define both religion and philosophy. Personally, I don't think religion has anything to do with philosophy at all because I think philosophy requires rationality as its first principle and religion requires one to abandon rational thought. So any discussion on religion would be contained within theology and would never enter the bounds (realm?) of philosophy at all. But like I said before, this is a personal opinion based on how I define religion and philosophy.

I define religion as any branch of thought that derives from the acceptance as an axiom that there exists a being who designed and created the universe.

sthitapragya wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:In the US it certainly is. Both are belief systems, yet excuses are more readily made when it comes to religion as this article explains:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... hilosophy/

PhilX

Should religion be favored over philosophy?This can have no correct answer. It would depend upon how you define both religion and philosophy. Personally, I don't think religion has anything to do with philosophy at all because I think philosophy requires rationality as its first principle and religion requires one to abandon rational thought. So any discussion on religion would be contained within theology and would never enter the bounds (realm?) of philosophy at all. But like I said before, this is a personal opinion based on how I define religion and philosophy.

Are you saying that it's a waste of time for this forum to have a section devoted to the philosophy of religion?

PhilX

Philosophy Explorer wrote:

sthitapragya wrote:

Philosophy Explorer wrote:In the US it certainly is. Both are belief systems, yet excuses are more readily made when it comes to religion as this article explains:

https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.co ... hilosophy/

PhilX

Should religion be favored over philosophy?This can have no correct answer. It would depend upon how you define both religion and philosophy. Personally, I don't think religion has anything to do with philosophy at all because I think philosophy requires rationality as its first principle and religion requires one to abandon rational thought. So any discussion on religion would be contained within theology and would never enter the bounds (realm?) of philosophy at all. But like I said before, this is a personal opinion based on how I define religion and philosophy.

Are you saying that it's a waste of time for this forum to have a section devoted to the philosophy of religion?

PhilX

No. I love this section and spend most of my time here. I just don't think it is philosophy.