For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
You strike me as the sort of person who can't be reasoned with.bobevenson wrote:Marriage exists for the protection of children, wives, and property? Where the hell was that ever chiseled in granite or written in the Magna Carta or the U.S. Constitution? That may be your opinion, but it's not the opinion of the American Energy Party (AEP).
Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment.bobevenson wrote:You strike me as the kind of person who can't answer a question or support his own argument.
Well, I'm glad I've finally found somebody around this joint who agrees with me!Harbal wrote:Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment.bobevenson wrote:You strike me as the kind of person who can't answer a question or support his own argument.
Since I was aware of the kind of person I am before you were, I think it is you who are agreeing with me.bobevenson wrote: Well, I'm glad I've finally found somebody around this joint who agrees with me!
No, I'm sorry, I made a statement, and you said, "Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment." I believe that indicates you are agreeing with me.Harbal wrote:Since I was aware of the kind of person I am before you were, I think it is you who are agreeing with me.bobevenson wrote: Well, I'm glad I've finally found somebody around this joint who agrees with me!
OK. I'll let you have it.bobevenson wrote: No, I'm sorry, I made a statement, and you said, "Yes, that sounds like a fair assessment." I believe that indicates you are agreeing with me.
A wise strategic move and the only known method of getting him to shut his gob.Harbal wrote:OK. I'll let you have it.
Given that most people believe being married to more than one person at a time is a bad idea....I think you're mistaken.bobevenson wrote:The recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision (barely a majority and representing the wide disagreement on the issue among Americans) declaring homosexual marriage valid in all 50 states, only amplifies the AEP position that the term "marriage" has no place in government legislation. Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
It doesn't matter what most people think. Do you want your life run by what most people think?Melchior wrote:Given that most people believe being married to more than one person at a time is a bad idea....I think you're mistaken.bobevenson wrote:The recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision (barely a majority and representing the wide disagreement on the issue among Americans) declaring homosexual marriage valid in all 50 states, only amplifies the AEP position that the term "marriage" has no place in government legislation. Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
The blood tests screen for STD's and serve a useful function. To my knowledge they don't bar marriage, but only recommend treatment for the disease. So the blood test serves a medical purpose.bobevenson wrote: Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.
The government does not demand blood tests for people shacking up or having casual sex, so the entire policy is fraudulent.thedoc wrote:The blood tests screen for STD's and serve a useful function. To my knowledge they don't bar marriage, but only recommend treatment for the disease. So the blood test serves a medical purpose.bobevenson wrote: Marriage licenses and mandatory blood tests should be immediately abolished as serving no legitimate purpose whatsoever.