Re: Can anyone answer these questions?
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2015 9:35 pm
bobevenson wrote:That DNA has left the building.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
bobevenson wrote:That DNA has left the building.
Have you ever been sued for libel? You're pushing your luck, little man (or woman, as it may be).Arising_uk wrote:bobevenson wrote:That DNA has left the building.And apparently reproducing in you.
Sue away you loon, as the evidence is clear.bobevenson wrote:Have you ever been sued for libel? You're pushing your luck, little man (or woman, as it may be).
1. Since Aristotle was the teacher of Alexander the Great, he would say conquer the welfare state. There is little utility for extensive welfare.Kingfisher wrote:Great philosophical minds of Philosophy Now! I have a challenge for you. The challenges are as follows:
1. How can the welfare state, especially the extensive ones, be understood from an Aristotelian and Utilitarian position?
2. Is it possible to defend progressive fines for speeding, i.e. fines for speeding based on income, by using the distributive justice thinkers like Rawls, Nozick, Cohen and Walzer or from positions such as the principle of fairness?
I await your replies eagerly!
Where did you ever get a stupid idea like that?Impenitent wrote:Fair is that which the person with the most effective killing machines says it is.
practical human historybobevenson wrote:Where did you ever get a stupid idea like that?Impenitent wrote:Fair is that which the person with the most effective killing machines says it is.
What the hell does that have to do with "fairness," have you lost your mind?Impenitent wrote:practical human historybobevenson wrote:Where did you ever get a stupid idea like that?Impenitent wrote:Fair is that which the person with the most effective killing machines says it is.