Philosophy Now Forum

jackles wrote:freud in my opinion was absolutly correct in the fundermentles of phycology. ...

Which ones?

yes ariseing.the ego the id and the superego.it cant get much better than that it diffines the personality and how it relates to the event in a clear and positive way.

jackles wrote:yes ariseing.the ego the id and the superego.it cant get much better than that it diffines the personality and how it relates to the event in a clear and positive way.

How? What I mean is in what way in your life do you use them.

Arising_uk wrote:

jackles wrote:yes ariseing.the ego the id and the superego.it cant get much better than that it diffines the personality and how it relates to the event in a clear and positive way.

How? What I mean is in what way in your life do you use them.

You want something. You work out how to get it. You worry about whether you should have.
I'm off to the fridge. Cheers K.

uwot wrote:You want something. You work out how to get it. You worry about whether you should have.
I'm off to the fridge. Cheers K.

Not quite, as its the 'id' that 'wants' it, the 'super-ego' who tells it it can't have it and the 'ego' who mediates between them. Waste of bleeding time I think, especially since Mason appeared to discover that the whole shebang got knocked-up because his original paper was rejected-out of hand.

Ah, well. I never got beyond The Psychopathology of Everyday Life to be honest. Don't remember much; something to do with Bosnia and Herzegovina, I think. Got busted for speeding on my way there a couple of weeks back as it happens, 72kmph in a 50kmph zone, hooligan that I am. 300 Kuna fine, blagged it down to 150. The officer was a Chelsea fan, I think he felt sorry for me.

it feels right and it rings true.to my ego that is any way..ignorance is id shaped the bliss of having ya head in the sand.

jackles wrote:it feels right and it rings true.to my ego that is any way..ignorance is id shaped the bliss of having ya head in the sand.

So, are you your ego or your id?

ha.ids are personal and they give the ego its false feeling of being .super ego is the true identity the sub consciouse.sub consciousness exists independent of the brain event and is the one true identity of self.

jackles wrote:ha.ids are personal and they give the ego its false feeling of being .super ego is the true identity the sub consciouse.sub consciousness exists independent of the brain event and is the one true identity of self.

So are egos not personal? Do you really think that super ego is the true identity of sub consciousness? Where in a human being, or outside of one, does the true identity of self exist?

egos get there local event identity from the world.but there real id is the subconsciousness a nonlocal identity that they where born with.this super identity never happened as a part of the event.it always existed and is heisenbergs uncertainty principle without the event that it caused.ha

What exactly do you mean by non local, Jackles? If I were to mention the force that acts between the Earth and the Moon, where does non local fit in?

the event is a representation of nonlocality all of it including time and space.nonlocality is relativity in the event all of it including human relativity its all the same thing .nonlocality dosnt move but moves all things including planets and emotions.the universe is a local blink in the eye of nonlocality.thats the way it is uwot including gravity.the whole blinking lot.core blimey mate.

You've still not said how you use such distinctions in your life?

if i am at a food shop and there are reduced items i dont take the lot for my self.well now and then i do but i try to consider the neighbour i dont know.because i know the neighbour i will never know shares the same nonlocal id as my self.basical i try to be as least selfish as i can.jesus was right every body you know or dont know is your nonlocal brother in the local event.parable of the good samar.you know just generaly makin sure the event doesnt own ya ass.