Re: AMERICAN DEER
Posted: Mon May 19, 2014 1:04 pm
Thankyou all for clarifying your position on this subject, it makes it much easier to determine how to respond.
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Hmm...I'd agree with this if the hunters were actually hunting in a way that allowed the natural senses to work, so bows and arrows, knives, etc but high-powered rifles with scopes? Seems a touch unfair to the deer to blame them for this.thedoc wrote:You need to spend some time observing eastern US white tale deer. The smart ones avoid humans and survive, the dumb ones are the ones that run out on the highway or aren't aware of the presence of hunters, and should be removed from the gene pool.
As usual you mean the one you agree with. I note that you've not responded to mine with respect to the economic and employment issue you tacked onto to wildlife issue. I also note that you've not responded to the obvious explanation for why these deer do need to be culled, one that pretty much makes your claim that it's all about value in a capitalist society a nonsense that you only introduced to get on to your pet subject of closed-shop american unionism.Bill Wiltrack wrote:.GREAT post.
Thank you for having the balls and the brains to articulate the one rather intelligent response to my thread..
If hunting were to revert to Bow and arrow, knives, or spears, there would be a lot more deer that would be wounded and run off to die or live crippled. The high powered rifle with a scope is to allow a quick clean kill, not a wounding. The underlying purpose of hunting is not sport, but to reduce the number of deer and control the population. Granted, most hunters don't know this, but they are not the authority issuing the license to take a deer. The license issued and the length of the season is based on the size of the herd and how many deer need to be removed. If the deer could control it's own population, there would be no need for hunting, but nature allows them to produce as many offspring as possible to off set those taken by predators, and now man is that predator. You don't like hunting as it is done now, simply eliminate the deer herd altogether and there will be no need to hunt them.Arising_uk wrote:Hmm...I'd agree with this if the hunters were actually hunting in a way that allowed the natural senses to work, so bows and arrows, knives, etc but high-powered rifles with scopes? Seems a touch unfair to the deer to blame them for this.thedoc wrote:You need to spend some time observing eastern US white tale deer. The smart ones avoid humans and survive, the dumb ones are the ones that run out on the highway or aren't aware of the presence of hunters, and should be removed from the gene pool.
I know, and feel the same way. I open Bill's thread - if I open them all - with trepidation. Someone new might be shocked. But I think they'll get over it; it's not as if ugly stuff were generally unavailable on the internet.vegetariantaxidermy wrote: ... I am aware of the horrible things going on in the world, but I still don't want to see things that are going to give me nightmares for the rest of my life. People need to be a bit careful what they post without warning.
So now, in order not to be blamed for some armed thug shooting him, a deer has not only to be super-smart and super-fast, but psychic, as well?thedoc:
There is more to the senses than just sight, smell, and hearing, sometimes there is just a feeling that someone else is there. I've talked to a lot of hunters and sometimes a deer, or other game, will just spook and run for no apparent reason.
Or maybe just those with the skills would be allowed to hunt rather than any yahoo with the money to buy a gun and scope. But did I say I disagreed with the culling idea?thedoc wrote:...
If hunting were to revert to Bow and arrow, knives, or spears, there would be a lot more deer that would be wounded and run off to die or live crippled. The high powered rifle with a scope is to allow a quick clean kill, not a wounding. The underlying purpose of hunting is not sport, but to reduce the number of deer and control the population. Granted, most hunters don't know this, but they are not the authority issuing the license to take a deer. The license issued and the length of the season is based on the size of the herd and how many deer need to be removed. If the deer could control it's own population, there would be no need for hunting, but nature allows them to produce as many offspring as possible to off set those taken by predators, and now man is that predator. You don't like hunting as it is done now, simply eliminate the deer herd altogether and there will be no need to hunt them. ...
Well none that the human can conceive of but given that game has to survive by running I'd guess that any disturbance in the environment that their senses notice may cause a spook.There is more to the senses than just sight, smell, and hearing, sometimes there is just a feeling that someone else is there. I've talked to a lot of hunters and sometimes a deer, or other game, will just spook and run for no apparent reason.

Arising_uk wrote:thedoc wrote:...Well none that the human can conceive of but given that game has to survive by running I'd guess that any disturbance in the environment that their senses notice may cause a spook.There is more to the senses than just sight, smell, and hearing, sometimes there is just a feeling that someone else is there. I've talked to a lot of hunters and sometimes a deer, or other game, will just spook and run for no apparent reason.
And yet QP and Astronomy is all about what we can see and measure and history is in the books?thedoc wrote:Yes, that's the safe thing, reduce everything to what you can see and measure, don't leave anything that could be beyond your understanding. If that were the best thing to do, I would reject Quantum Physics, most of astronomy, and all of history that happened before I was born, just to name a few.
Better than making-up super-natural causes.NIH. so it doesn't exist.
