Re: is there only one blackhole
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 8:23 pm
beond the gravitational event horizon.or the 4force event horizon.there is no thing..as it was in the begining so shall it be in the end.nothing.but nothing is something.
Philosophy Now Forum
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
is there only one blackhole
Page 2 of 2
Re: is there only one blackhole
Posted: Fri Jun 20, 2014 8:33 pm
More gibberish Jackles. That makes even less sense than the last post.
Re: is there only one blackhole
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 7:18 pm
there is no inside or outside to a blackhole because everything in existance relates to the one black hole which we or should i say our universe must be apart of.the blackholes we see are all just part of the same one black hole which we are apart of.if we could get out side the universe and look at it .it would be fulla holes.
Re: is there only one blackhole
Posted: Sat Jun 21, 2014 7:38 pm
Yeah in religious terms perhaps Buddhist I am sure that makes sense, in terms of physics it makes no sense, mixing science and religion is dangerous, it causes a lot of bitterness. Although linking Buddhism with physics well
they don't tend to be that violent so meh.
The only thing full of holes is trying to mix religion with science and coming up with anything coherent Jackles.
"There is a source of all whether it is a being or just a physical consequence is irelevant."
Some Buddhist dude.
Makes sense in physics terms, true but I wouldn't try and mix and match what physics says, yes the university had a singularity which caused the big bang, you might call that a source, but I think it's better if you are clear about when you are talking religion and when you are talking about the physics of singularities such as in black holes or at the beginning of time.
"we are all one with the cosmos."
Again Buddhism and Hinudism as well who call that thing that is the self Atman.
Again saying all things are connected is physics, saying all spirits are connected is religion, it's not the same thing.
One thing I can be sure of though is nothing is nothing a set outside of the Universe which is everything and every some thing be it mental or physical it all is part of the all, a concept is all nothing is it does not exist physically and can not, something is always something as has been explained several times by others. Sure nothing is a part of the Universe, but in physical terms there is no such thing, it is as impossible as squaring the circle or perpetual motion.
they don't tend to be that violent so meh.
The only thing full of holes is trying to mix religion with science and coming up with anything coherent Jackles.
"There is a source of all whether it is a being or just a physical consequence is irelevant."
Some Buddhist dude.
Makes sense in physics terms, true but I wouldn't try and mix and match what physics says, yes the university had a singularity which caused the big bang, you might call that a source, but I think it's better if you are clear about when you are talking religion and when you are talking about the physics of singularities such as in black holes or at the beginning of time.
"we are all one with the cosmos."
Again Buddhism and Hinudism as well who call that thing that is the self Atman.
Again saying all things are connected is physics, saying all spirits are connected is religion, it's not the same thing.
One thing I can be sure of though is nothing is nothing a set outside of the Universe which is everything and every some thing be it mental or physical it all is part of the all, a concept is all nothing is it does not exist physically and can not, something is always something as has been explained several times by others. Sure nothing is a part of the Universe, but in physical terms there is no such thing, it is as impossible as squaring the circle or perpetual motion.