Thank you for the remarks but I humbly suggest correct reading of my post.attofishpi wrote:You contradict yourself at the outset. One cannot be the creator of something if one has no will.Svetoslav wrote:God as creator of the universe is incapable of any will, self-awareness, and thought. Neither God chose to create or not to create the universe. The only thing that God is capable of is being simultaneously the absolute existence or inexistence. And exactly that OR in the middle is the universe we can see. So in terms God is not the universe, but the universe is everything God could be.
Why bother to ascribe to something that you describe as nothing more than existence and reality the name, God?
Having will is inseparable of having (some, whatever) consciousness. Having consciousness is inseparable of being defined. Being defined means to be something among other things and this is incompatible with being the ultimate creator of everything.
As I wrote, God (or whatever as creator of everything aka the universe) is NOT the universe, but the universe is everything God could be.
For this to function, God must be ultimately undefined – timeless, absolutely homogenous and dimensionless. Being such, God is not concerned with the existence at all, meaning that God can be both ultimately existent and/or ultimately inexistent or everything in-between. Exactly this “and/or” condition is the universe. It is every possible state of God between the ultimate existence and inexistence.
This is needed to explain the three main principles of the universe: the duality, the uncertainty and the relativity. And the three main motivators: curiosity, competition and love.
If interested, read this and tell me what you think about my theory. Thanks.