Philosophy Now Forum

bobevenson wrote:I thought it looked kind of disgusting.

And thus sexual abnormalities are born. Can you say, "puritan?" A misnomer if ever there was one.

bobevenson wrote:OK, if it's so great, can they show it on network TV?

As if the greed of money, necessarily bears any reflection of truth upon natures beauty.

.



Thank you.


Well stated.


Thanks for adding to this thread.




.

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

bobevenson wrote:OK, if it's so great, can they show it on network TV?

As if the greed of money, necessarily bears any reflection of truth upon natures beauty.

Sorry, the FTC isn't in it for the money.

bobevenson wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:

bobevenson wrote:OK, if it's so great, can they show it on network TV?

As if the greed of money, necessarily bears any reflection of truth upon natures beauty.

Sorry, the FTC isn't in it for the money.

Whats the FTC got to do with it? You were referencing the FCC, not the FTC. So you think you can speak for the whole of the FCC, huh? Are you in fact the head honcho at the FCC? So they do their job for free, and have another job that actually pays their bills? What does the F stand for? Federal? As in Federal government? As in that entity that is in charge of all of the constituents of the United States of America? That has to please, or at least, at times, seemingly so, all the various people, nut job puritans and all? Why, isn't it true, that the majority of the FCC's commissioners, are in fact appointed by the current President. Can you say reelection? Can you say, "Money and power?"

Not everyone can understand the dynamics of the current systems in place.

I meant the FCC, of course. Again, the FCC is not in existence to make a profit, my friend. That said, like most government agencies, it has no proper function.

bobevenson wrote:I meant the FCC, of course. Again, the FCC is not in existence to make a profit, my friend. That said, like most government agencies, it has no proper function.

The FCC does many things, but in terms of what can and cannot be televised on national 'over the air' television, that anyone with a television set, can pick up for 'free,' their job is to pacify, through exclusion of content, those voters that would have a hissy-fit otherwise. There are all kinds of people here in the United (Melting-Pot) States of America, with all kinds of beliefs, to exclude certain content from that particular medium, when it is readily available on paid programming television, i.e., cable and satellite, especially premium channels, lends to both, of that money and power of which I've spoken, and the true beliefs of the beauty of nature, to which Bill and I have also referred, one just has to 'pay,' to access it.

If the signal is freely available, there are those that can twist that fact, such to make it seem, as though it's being thrust upon them, whereas, if one has to pay to have access, it is seen commonly as their decision to subscribe to it, and then they can't complain, can they, of course all of this brings smiles to those faces that control it, as their bank accounts grow ever increasingly.