reasonvemotion wrote:That the milk was voided and not left to remain stagnant so as the body reabsorbed it in a non natural way.
Which is the process when women decide to cease breast feeding.
No that's only after, the glands have been purged for some time, the time it takes to ween a child. And don't forget, while I may not know the exact mechanisms that are involved, according to the study, it is a fact that women that breastfeed are less likely to get breast cancer, while those that instead choose to dry up and feed their baby man-made, mass produced substitutes, have a greater risk of breast cancer. If I remember correctly, if one never gets pregnant, thus not setting the body in motion to facilitate breastfeeding, they don't have to worry. I see that there is a cleansing action, that's purely my analogy, but in addition there could be some long term physiological changes in the glands, after a period of time. Which to me makes sense. Look the only thing that really matters here is that both Mother and Child are better served by breastfeeding, a natural state of events, go figure!
And I truly believe that in fact men have a lesser chance of prostate cancer when the contents of the prostate is regularly purged/exercised via ejaculation, Bills comical gif aside. Lets face it, a man is at greater risk, as he grows older, after his testosterone levels start to drop, causing his desire to wane, thus sexual function frequency is diminished. What's that old saying, use it or loose it? In this case I believe it, (actually in all cases I believe it). Of course I see that in addition, cardiovascular health should be maintained, and that producing ejaculate, on a regular basis, aids in this endeavor, in a localized fashion. As one exercises muscle fibers, assuming they're breathing properly, the fibers are both nourished and oxygenated more readily, while breaking them down, causes them to build up tougher and stronger. Of course one cannot forget the importance of nutrition.
So YES, I see that the regular sexual activity of a couple, as they grow older together, is important to their long term health, on many levels.
). Minus all the gawker's, of course! It's all about the chemicals between us. There are hormone therapies, which I understand are ever increasingly, sometimes needed, as one grows older. Care needs to be taken in their use, but I think along with some regular acrobatics, to aid in blood flow, one could control any possible side effects. Could that be at the core of your dilemma? Was there ever a time otherwise?
