Philosophy Now Forum

"The Gods stopped speaking to us long ago. "This appears to be an empirical claim, thus subject to refutation. So, if God or gods, speak to one person we can take it to have been refuted?

all the best, rantal

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.














...........................................................................................................













.

You are hereby awarded the grand prize for submitting the most pretentious and pointless posts ever conceived by man (of course, I'm using the term "man" loosely here).

.


Why?



Because I turned you out?


I'm not attacking your philosophy. Matter of fact, I give you credit just for trying to conceive an overall concept. Good for you.

What I am saying is that there are political forums that you could throw your ideas out on.


Don't ask me to read your ideas.


Nobody here is going to read your ideas.

Nobody here is going to believe in your ideas because YOU don't believe in your ideas.



RUN FOR A POLITICAL OFFICE!


Use your ideas. Perhaps they will work.


Share with us the position you will run for. - Odds are someone here has some political experience and they will help you.


I'm not attacking you.

I'm asking you, as a philosopher, to move forward.









.........................................................








.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.........................................................

Yeah, and you're the biggest cocksucker here.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:Why?

Bill, my wife seems to think that "He's just one of those people that likes to stir up shit." I tend to concur. From the way he hounds, it would seem to be the case. It would seem he fancies himself an angler. Of course we could be wrong.

Nobody here is going to read your ideas.

I will.

Civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock.
Sigmund Freud

reasonvemotion wrote:

Nobody here is going to read your ideas.

I will.

Civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock.
Sigmund Freud

Much better after your edit, but still...

.


Yeah, I agree.



Nobody here is going to read your ideas.
That was a blanket statement that I actually cut and then decided to put it back in. The sentence seemed necessary for the flow or rhythm In the end, of the post. In the end I was wrong to make that statement.


I don't think he believes in the political philosophy he repeats here over & over again.

It just seems hollow.




.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:I don't think he believes in the political philosophy he repeats here over & over again. It just seems hollow.

No, that hollow sound is coming from your head, my friend.

.















...............................................................................













.

.



Ya know...I have shown you patience but I'm beginning to feel like the dog in this GIF, and you are the turtle.








........................................................................................







I think EVERYONE, including me, is TIRED of your spiel.


It's old.


RUN. FOR. OFFICE.



DO SOMETHING besides tell US about your GREAT philosophy.








.

Bill just list him as a foe and be done with it. You can always reverse it permanently later or per message, temporarily.

SpheresOfBalance wrote:Bill just list him as a foe and be done with it. You can always reverse it permanently later or per message, temporarily.

Who the fuck are you, Bill's analyst???

bobevenson wrote:

SpheresOfBalance wrote:Bill just list him as a foe and be done with it. You can always reverse it permanently later or per message, temporarily.

Who the fuck are you, Bill's analyst???

All I'm saying is that before he allows you to goad him, If I were him, I'd simply ignore your words; Problem solved. You know you love the attention, that's why you go there.