Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Sorry, I'm not a student of ancient history, nor do I maintain an archive. If you actually have some kind of question, I'd be more than happy to address it.

Get up to speed bob. In this medium archiving is not an issue. Click-on view your posts and use the search box to find posts with the relevant words, e.g tax, evonsonomics. Shouldn't take more than ten to twenty minutes to find the issues I raised concerning your idea. I look forward to your considered responses, i.e. solutions or critique of my thought.

Look, why don't you just take a simple baby step, and ask me a single simple-assed political economic question, and I'll give you a simple-assed answer that even you can understand, OK?

Thank you for proving my point about you boob.

Arising_uk wrote:Thank you for proving my point about you boob.

What point? Are you unable to ask a single relevant question?

No, but history shows you are unable to reply to them and, unlike you, I try to learn from history. As do others it appears, as this is why you've had no replies to yet another re-issue of your taxation 'policy'.

Prove me wrong. Reply to some of my earlier questions. I don't look for agreement just considered replies that may lead me, unlike you, to revise my beliefs - its called philosophizing.

Arising_uk wrote:No, but history shows you are unable to reply to them and, unlike you, I try to learn from history. As do others it appears, as this is why you've had no replies to yet another re-issue of your taxation 'policy'.

Prove me wrong. Reply to some of my earlier questions. I don't look for agreement just considered replies that may lead me, unlike you, to revise my beliefs - its called philosophizing.

Oh, please, just ask me a goddamn question, OK?

You are pretending Arising hasn't asked you any questions, Bob. This alternative universe you insist on presenting to us is the reason no one can take you seriously, dude!

mickthinks wrote:You are pretending Arising hasn't asked you any questions, Bob. This alternative universe you insist on presenting to us is the reason no one can take you seriously, dude!

First of all, I really can't take anybody from Augsburg seriously. But to try and address your comment, I wish you would do me the courtesy of refreshing my memory on what goddamn question you or anybody else wants answered. Is that asking too much???

I'm happy to refresh your memory of the first time you tried to use Augsburg as a cover for your lack of an answer. It was here, when you were trying to hold up your ignorance as evidence of everyone else's stupidity.

mickthinks wrote:I'm happy to refresh your memory of the first time you tried to use Augsburg as a cover for your lack of an answer. It was here, when you were trying to hold up your ignorance as evidence of everyone else's stupidity.

Well, I guess that establishes the fact that both you and Arising lack either the ability or the balls to formulate a question. Is there anybody else out there that wants to take me on?

bobevenson wrote:Oh, please, just ask me a goddamn question, OK?

What medication do you take or is it just alcohol?

bobevenson wrote:Well, I guess that establishes the fact ...

... that Bob doesn't understand the difference between guess and fact.

Arising_uk wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Oh, please, just ask me a goddamn question, OK?

What medication do you take or is it just alcohol?

Sorry, bitch, I was asking for a relevant question.

mickthinks wrote:

bobevenson wrote:Well, I guess that establishes the fact ...

... that Bob doesn't understand the difference between guess and fact.

Why don't you and Arising join a club that worships whatever it is that you two are doing?

Why would I ask one of those given your history of not replying to them with considered answers?

As usual you didn't answer the question so I guess meds.

bobevenson wrote:Why don't you and Arising join a club that worships whatever it is that you two are doing?

I think I'll leave the "worship" to you godbotherers thanks.