Is morality objective or subjective?

[Terrapin Station]

The purpose is that some phenomena only occur in brains, and some people claim that those phenomena occur elsewhere (only, or too).

You are saying the same shit in different words.

Yes. some phenomena only occur at some locations and not other locations.

Like the phenomenon of "life". It only occurs in this universe.

So what?

Again, so, some people claim otherwise. It's useful to have words in which to express disagreement about that.

[Skepdick]

Again, so, some people claim otherwise. It's useful to have words in which to express disagreement about that.

What is the otherwise claim to "Some phenomena only occur at some locations and not other locations." ?

[Terrapin Station]

Again, so, some people claim otherwise. It's useful to have words in which to express disagreement about that.

What is the otherwise claim to "Some phenomena only occur at some locations and not other locations." ?

Can you stop trolling?

[Skepdick]

Can you stop trolling?

Not trolling.

I am still unclear about the point of your point. Given that the principle is a clear truism.

Some phenomena only occur at some locations and not other locations.

SO WHAT?

[Terrapin Station]

Can you stop trolling?

Not trolling.

Then what's the problem?

What's the topic of the thread?

[Skepdick]

Then what's the problem?

What's the topic of the thread?

The problem is the undecidability of distinctions.

Is the objective/subjective distinction objective or subjective?
Is it Indexical or non-indexical.

[Terrapin Station]

Then what's the problem?

What's the topic of the thread?

The problem is the undecidability of distinctions.

Then how did you decide to use the word "undecidable" rather than "decidable"? (As well as the words "The" "problem," "is" etc.?)

[Skepdick]

Then how did you decide to use the word "undecidable" rather than "decidable"? (As well as the words "The" "problem," "is" etc.?)

Trivially. I didn't know HOW to decide, therefore I used "undecidable".

not-P -> Q

[Terrapin Station]

Then how did you decide to use the word "undecidable" rather than "decidable"? (As well as the words "The" "problem," "is" etc.?)

Trivially. I didn't know HOW to decide, therefore I used "undecidable".

Huh? So you mean you just went with one on a whim?

[Skepdick]

Huh? So you mean you just went with one on a whim?

It's not a whim.

I couldn't decide! So I said "undecidable"

If you think it's decidable - tell me how.

[Terrapin Station]

Huh? So you mean you just went with one on a whim?

It's not a whim.

I couldn't decide! So I said "undecidable"

That was a decision. If you choose to not decide, you still have made a choice.

[Skepdick]

That was a decision. If you choose to not decide, you still have made a choice.

A choice is not a decision.

Decisions require information.

[Terrapin Station]

That was a decision. If you choose to not decide, you still have made a choice.

A choice is not a decision.

Decisions require information.

Is that a distinction you've decided?

[Skepdick]

Is that a distinction you've decided?

No. It's the default position.

Everything is distinct from everything else, right?

Sameness is a decision.
Difference is not.

[Terrapin Station]

Is that a distinction you've decided?

No. It's the default position.

The "default position" per what?