Philosophy Now Forum

Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:28 am

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:47 pmDo you realize that I never got past Chapter One in all this time? No one even understands his explanation as to why man's will is not free...

Do you not think one possible reason for that is because it isn't particularly clear?

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:47 pm...and why the way he accurately defines it...

What do you think makes one person's definition of a concept more accurate than another's?

Only by its validly and soundness. The author wrote 7 books in an effort to make his discovery as clear as possible. It doesn’t take rocket science to understand it, but it does take a sincere desire. If there is no desire because extreme skepticism has taken over, it will not be understood because the interest is not there, not because people don’t have the ability to follow his observations and reasoning. This is exactly why there hasn’t been one question, nothing to show that what he wrote was carefully read, let alone taken seriously.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 2:57 am

Will Bouwman wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 12:28 am

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:47 pmDo you realize that I never got past Chapter One in all this time? No one even understands his explanation as to why man's will is not free...

Do you not think one possible reason for that is because it isn't particularly clear?

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:47 pm...and why the way he accurately defines it...

What do you think makes one person's definition of a concept more accurate than another's?

Only by its validly and soundness. The author wrote 7 books in an effort to make his discovery as clear as possible. It doesn’t take rocket science to understand it, but it does take a sincere desire.

And, money, obviously.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 2:57 am If there is no desire because extreme skepticism has taken over, it will not be understood because the interest is not there, not because people don’t have the ability to follow his observations and reasoning. This is exactly why there hasn’t been one question, nothing to show that what he wrote was carefully read, let alone taken seriously.

Just maybe you have not 'carefully read' the responses, and questions, here.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:05 pm :::sound of a far-away sitar Through the clouds a golden ray Behold! A shimmering presence descends:::

Greetings peace girl.

Though I have listened to nothing, I have heard everything.

.

I know how it sounds. All I can say is give the author the benefit of the doubt if you care to.

https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:s ... b35b0724b3

For some unfortunate reason I cannot break through the thinking that has harden into truth. It is actually preventing the very thing hoped and prayed for. This video gives us a glimpse into what is occurring, although it doesn’t solve the deeply embedded desire of those who choose to be right at the expense of a better way.

https://youtu.be/p-uxp_-343s?si=7wT7fnA_RN6CEg2R

Although this book is not about religion per se, the author does say that having no free will supports that there is design which is why we can now can prevent from coming back that for which blame and punishment were previously necessary. When this knowledge is thoroughly understood, it gives us absolute proof that God (this mathematical revelation of infinite wisdom) is alive and well without having to resort to faith in an imaginary God.

https://youtu.be/yPldAilHqCI?si=65HSZbWw1DQIeLDl

It’s actually not surprising that no one seems interested in this major discovery. It is being painted a false picture because of an argument that doesn’t hold up. The only thing I could think of is the bias that takes on a life of its own. FlashDangerpants said this argument was flawed based on his quick conclusion that this is a tautology with no usefulness, end of discussion. He denied that the author’s proof does not do what it claims. He is categorically wrong because he doesn’t know how this knowledge works when extended. He also bases his refutation on a definition of determinism that is flawed and the elephant in the room that is not being addressed. People are depending on the regular posters to get their information. That is why this author has no chance here. it is a sad commentary on those who are seriously searching for truth but have passed over this important book without their own critical analysis and review. 🫩

Oh my God, how the lack of response proves my case. These are arbitrary standards, not objective truths. I’m only posting here to bide my time. Soon, this author will be heard with the concentration and focus that he was denied. This denial in no way proves him wrong and empirical proof will be my vindicator! I know people here will snub their noses at me, but this will only give me the motivation to continue on and prove them wrong, although this effort was never my motivation. The sad part about all this is that people are missing out on knowledge that could help them now, not at some later time.

This is so revealing that not even one person shows curiosity. You people do not have the final word thinking you know better than everyone by virtue of your degrees. Your pompous attitude that anyone dare to refute you other than your own cronies is a real issue. That being said, I do not want to continue trying to prove this author right. I will however bring up issues that I know will be different in the new world on a practical level, as long as I am not banned because I broke sone nutty rule. Here is one that will not occur knowing that these ingredients can hurt our dogs. Thank goodness times are changing. Knowledge is power.

https://youtu.be/ga_brjySITo

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 3:25 pm This is so revealing that not even one person shows curiosity. You people do not have the final word thinking you know better than everyone by virtue of your degrees. Your pompous attitude that anyone dare to refute you other than your own cronies is a real issue. That being said, I do not want to continue trying to prove this author right. I will however bring up issues that I know will be different in the new world on a practical level, as long as I am not banned because I broke sone nutty rule. Here is one that will not occur knowing that these ingredients can hurt our dogs. Thank goodness times are changing. Knowledge is power.

https://youtu.be/ga_brjySITo

Seems like you are wholly incapable of simple comprehension.

A mind is potentially the most powerful life support system possible.
It processes all information in binary, the very definition of any thing, relative and correlative.
Binary produces exactly four methods of recursion, i.e., grammar systems. Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
In short, we parse and manage information in order to produce our behavior.

So, instead of a book of bull shit, where is that work in grammar which shows that our species is on the cusp of literacy?
A book which teaches the foundation of information parsing and management. Who is authoring such a book today?
Which grammar, in our grammar matrix, is the meta-grammar for the group? Do you know? And do you know why?
You do not even know where to look in order to educate yourself.
This puts you on par with the nut jobs on this forum.
You have offered nothing new, nor anything that actually helps. It is the ability to process information which is the power of a mind, it is not some lame doctrine of an idiot.

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 12:57 am

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 3:25 pm This is so revealing that not even one person shows curiosity. You people do not have the final word thinking you know better than everyone by virtue of your degrees. Your pompous attitude that anyone dare to refute you other than your own cronies is a real issue. That being said, I do not want to continue trying to prove this author right. I will however bring up issues that I know will be different in the new world on a practical level, as long as I am not banned because I broke sone nutty rule. Here is one that will not occur knowing that these ingredients can hurt our dogs. Thank goodness times are changing. Knowledge is power.

https://youtu.be/ga_brjySITo

Seems like you are wholly incapable of simple comprehension.

A mind is potentially the most powerful life support system possible.
It processes all information in binary, the very definition of any thing, relative and correlative.
Binary produces exactly four methods of recursion, i.e., grammar systems. Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
In short, we parse and manage information in order to produce our behavior.

So, instead of a book of bull shit, where is that work in grammar which shows that our species is on the cusp of literacy?
A book which teaches the foundation of information parsing and management. Who is authoring such a book today?
Which grammar, in our grammar matrix, is the meta-grammar for the group? Do you know? And do you know why?
You do not even know where to look in order to educate yourself.
This puts you on par with the nut jobs on this forum.
You have offered nothing new, nor anything that actually helps. It is the ability to process information which is the power of a mind, it is not some lame doctrine of an idiot.

WTF?!! This is not doctrine. The use of grammar is subjective as far as punctuation and syntax. As long as what is being expressed is understood, that is all that is necessary for clear communication from one individual to another. Yes, there are nuances in language depending on context but the human race has done pretty well in making their intentions through their words known. No, it’s not the book that’s bullshit. It’s you coming off that your garble of bullshit makes any sense.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 11:56 am

WTF?!! This is not doctrine. The use of grammar is subjective as far as punctuation and syntax. As long as what is being expressed is understood, that is all that is necessary for clear communication from one individual to another. Yes, there are nuances in language depending on context but the human race has done pretty well in making their intentions through their words known. No, it’s not the book that’s bullshit. It’s you coming off that your garble of bullshit makes any sense.
[/quote]

So, your great wisdom calls constant wars, the world on the verge of environmental collapse, is doing pretty well?

You must enjoy a life of being in a cluster fuck.
You have no understanding at all about the role of grammar in human behavior.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 11:56 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 12:57 am

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Dec 03, 2025 3:25 pm This is so revealing that not even one person shows curiosity. You people do not have the final word thinking you know better than everyone by virtue of your degrees. Your pompous attitude that anyone dare to refute you other than your own cronies is a real issue. That being said, I do not want to continue trying to prove this author right. I will however bring up issues that I know will be different in the new world on a practical level, as long as I am not banned because I broke sone nutty rule. Here is one that will not occur knowing that these ingredients can hurt our dogs. Thank goodness times are changing. Knowledge is power.

https://youtu.be/ga_brjySITo

Seems like you are wholly incapable of simple comprehension.

A mind is potentially the most powerful life support system possible.
It processes all information in binary, the very definition of any thing, relative and correlative.
Binary produces exactly four methods of recursion, i.e., grammar systems. Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
In short, we parse and manage information in order to produce our behavior.

So, instead of a book of bull shit, where is that work in grammar which shows that our species is on the cusp of literacy?
A book which teaches the foundation of information parsing and management. Who is authoring such a book today?
Which grammar, in our grammar matrix, is the meta-grammar for the group? Do you know? And do you know why?
You do not even know where to look in order to educate yourself.
This puts you on par with the nut jobs on this forum.
You have offered nothing new, nor anything that actually helps. It is the ability to process information which is the power of a mind, it is not some lame doctrine of an idiot.

WTF?!! This is not doctrine. The use of grammar is subjective as far as punctuation and syntax. As long as what is being expressed is understood, that is all that is necessary for clear communication from one individual to another. Yes, there are nuances in language depending on context but the human race has done pretty well in making their intentions through their words known. No, it’s not the book that’s bullshit. It’s you coming off that your garble of bullshit makes any sense.

Uh-oh, peacegirl, now you've done it,...

...the forum's shining exemplar of the Dunning-Kruger Effect (of which there are many on this site) is going to give you a piece of his mind.

Just try to remember the old adage...

"...Never mud-wrestle with a pig. You'll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it!..."
_______

A piece of mind. I love how the mind can’t explain silence. Peace of mind.

Not a new discovery.

Fairy wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 1:39 pm A piece of mind. I love how the mind can’t explain silence. Peace of mind.

Not a new discovery.

Huh??? I can't help but keep saying WTF!! You’re not listening. You’re assuming! You have no understanding of this discovery so stop pretending!

seeds wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 12:35 pm

peacegirl wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 11:56 am

Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 04, 2025 12:57 am

Seems like you are wholly incapable of simple comprehension.

A mind is potentially the most powerful life support system possible.
It processes all information in binary, the very definition of any thing, relative and correlative.
Binary produces exactly four methods of recursion, i.e., grammar systems. Common Grammar, Arithmetic, Algebra and Geometry.
In short, we parse and manage information in order to produce our behavior.

So, instead of a book of bull shit, where is that work in grammar which shows that our species is on the cusp of literacy?
A book which teaches the foundation of information parsing and management. Who is authoring such a book today?
Which grammar, in our grammar matrix, is the meta-grammar for the group? Do you know? And do you know why?
You do not even know where to look in order to educate yourself.
This puts you on par with the nut jobs on this forum.
You have offered nothing new, nor anything that actually helps. It is the ability to process information which is the power of a mind, it is not some lame doctrine of an idiot.

WTF?!! This is not doctrine. The use of grammar is subjective as far as punctuation and syntax. As long as what is being expressed is understood, that is all that is necessary for clear communication from one individual to another. Yes, there are nuances in language depending on context but the human race has done pretty well in making their intentions through their words known. No, it’s not the book that’s bullshit. It’s you coming off that your garble of bullshit makes any sense.

Uh-oh, peacegirl, now you've done it,...

...the forum's shining exemplar of the Dunning-Kruger Effect (of which there are many on this site) is going to give you a piece of his mind.

Just try to remember the old adage...

"...Never mud-wrestle with a pig. You'll both get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it!..."
_______

Thus is not the Dunbung-Kruger effect which is an easy cop out. This author knew what he was talking about but if you are already sure he didn’t, how in the world can his discovery be made known if this group is supposed to be the cream of the crop? 🫩