Philosophy Now Forum

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:36 pm The daily sad effort to reinflate this dead horse is bordering on necrophilia at this stage.

Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:21 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:36 pm The daily sad effort to reinflate this dead horse is bordering on necrophilia at this stage.

The fact that you laugh at a disgusting post shows me that you are just as ignorant as FlashDangerpants. Do you not have any couth at all? You are no better ethically than the ethics OF GOD you are trying to protect.

Interesting new move, trying to turn up the heat so somebody spends time in your thread getting angry at you. Not very subtle, though.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:38 pm Interesting new move, trying to turn up the heat so somebody spends time in your thread getting angry at you. Not very subtle, though.

It's not an interesting new move. It's a snarky response to a disgusting comment and someone laughing at it, as if it's funny.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:16 pm I have paid no attention to the content of this thread.

I commend you, mister Jacobi, for this singular display of wisdom.

You should print a frame this comment, it may be a unique event.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:59 pm

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:16 pm I have paid no attention to the content of this thread.

I commend you, mister Jacobi, for this singular display of wisdom.

You should print a frame this comment, it may be a unique event.

It may be sold for lots of money one day. His comment may be dismissed due to ignorance, but in the end, it will show what the author had to go through before he was actually listened to and heard.

It'a always money with this one

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:54 pm It'a always money with this one

Obviously, I can't change your mind that this is about money. I even said I would gift the book to you, but no, you wouldn't accept that either. I have tried to get some traction in here, but you and others have no interest in pursuing this knowledge, so my hands are tied.

:::sound of a far-away sitar Through the clouds a golden ray Behold! A shimmering presence descends:::

Greetings peace girl.

Though I have listened to nothing, I have heard everything.

.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:59 pm

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:16 pm I have paid no attention to the content of this thread.

I commend you, mister Jacobi, for this singular display of wisdom.

You should print a frame this comment, it may be a unique event.

Nazi!

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:12 pm

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Nov 11, 2025 8:28 pm We're at an impasse then. Without knowing if PG is an impassioned overzealous believer in a version of determinism that she thinks is revolutionary, original, and not yet thought of or if she is just an intellectual version of a car salesman trying to sell a model advertised as new but which has had the odometer rolled back, we cannot reach a verdict regarding the charges brought against her by one FDP.

Thank you promethean75 for recognizing that there is a problem with the direction this thread is going. I certainly am not a slick car salesman.

But, absolutely no one can even just 'try the product' until money is handed over, 'to you'.

Which, to some, might sound like the perfect 'slickest salesperson'.

See, no one can refute 'your claim' that 'this book' will begin 'the golden age', for humanity, unless people pay you money first. Now, if this is not a 'slick salesperson trick', then I do not know what is.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:12 pm If anyone wanted to understand the excerpts I posted, they would have realized very quickly that there may be something to this after all.

'Entice' the reader/customer first, and then leave them 'wondering what comes next'. Again, sounds like a nice 'slick sales trick'.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:12 pm But unfortunately when someone makes up their mind in advance that this is fraudulent, they will dismiss out of hand anything that goes against their worldview.

But, is any one thinking, in advance, that 'this' is fraudulent, at all?

Or, are people just curious as to why you do not just link to what you claim will create a 'golden age' for every one, for free? Are people wondering why 'we' 'have to' give you money first?

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:12 pm It’s not so much that tweaking the definition of determinism is front and center; it’s the knowledge that lies behind this door that leads to the discovery. I really don’t deserve the name calling, for I have been honest from day one.

Yes you have. you have kept telling us that if we do not give you money, then you will not present the texts.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:12 pm I’m not depending on this forum for anything.

Really?

To me, you are depending on this forum to find people, any one, to just give you some money for someone else's writings. To me you are depending on this forum to sell 'a book', which I now wonder is even allowed under this forum's rules. Also, it is 'a book', which is not even of your own writings.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Wed Nov 12, 2025 2:12 pm I’m just biding my time when I can reach the right people who have more influence than I do, to confirm that this knowledge lives up to its claims.

Imagine seeking out 'help' from others to find out if 'a book' lives up to its claims, or not, but expecting those 'to help' to 'pay for' the 'privilege' of 'helping'.

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:38 pm Interesting new move, trying to turn up the heat so somebody spends time in your thread getting angry at you. Not very subtle, though.

I'm trying to turn the heat down, not up. My motive has always been to have a productive discussion, which has not taken place. Do you realize that I never got past Chapter One in all this time? No one even understands his explanation as to why man's will is not free, and why the way he accurately defines it causes responsibility to be increased, not decreased, which is the elephant in the room.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:32 pm

Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:21 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:36 pm The daily sad effort to reinflate this dead horse is bordering on necrophilia at this stage.

The fact that you laugh at a disgusting post shows me that you are just as ignorant as FlashDangerpants. Do you not have any couth at all? You are no better ethically than the ethics OF GOD you are trying to protect.

Imagine using the 'ethics' word when,

1. you are using the sales pitch, 'This book will bring about a 'golden age' for humanity', but I will only provide 'those teachings', to you, only if you give me some money, first.

2. Worse still, you are doing 'this' when 'those teachings' are not even 'your own'.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:32 pm

Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 12:21 pm

FlashDangerpants wrote: ↑Sun Nov 16, 2025 3:36 pm The daily sad effort to reinflate this dead horse is bordering on necrophilia at this stage.

The fact that you laugh at a disgusting post shows me that you are just as ignorant as FlashDangerpants. Do you not have any couth at all? You are no better ethically than the ethics OF GOD you are trying to protect.

If those words were chosen in attempt to "turn the heat down" I will need to downgrade my opinion regarding your intelligence. Soon you will be competing with moss and bits of fluff found under the couch for intellectual glory.

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:47 pmDo you realize that I never got past Chapter One in all this time? No one even understands his explanation as to why man's will is not free...

Do you not think one possible reason for that is because it isn't particularly clear?

peacegirl wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:47 pm...and why the way he accurately defines it...

What do you think makes one person's definition of a concept more accurate than another's?