Page 96 of 173

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 7:19 pm
by Aetixintro
Dear Barbara Brooks
Are you sure you're not repeating yourself? It looks like a mammoth task to give a summary of this thread? Happy New Year! :)

In memoriam

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 9:52 pm
by Arising_uk
Satyr wrote:n*****, I do believe this is the last one. I understand your need, but you bore me to tears.
Do I? Why so many replies?
So here's one for the memories:
Nice.
Keep swinging n*****. I've seen enough to last me a lifetime, and still my eyes are accosted daily.
Haven't we all.
No, n*****, this was my venting place, and you my tool; my punching-bag.
Therapy getting too pricey? Still, BB had your number then.
If you quote enough you might impress someone and make a monkey believe you are thinknig when you are only munching on a banana and slipping on the peel.
Scare quote monkey-boy, as such it shows where my thought is unsure of the use of the word.
I am n*****, I am...and I will, undoubtedly, be many m ore, as your judgments needs to be validated and so I will quickly break my resolution, proving how intelligent you are, and how well you got me.

I am, after all, here for the attention, n*****, because I, obviously, do not get enough of it in my real life. Nobody likes me, n*****, that's the truth.
Not surprised, is this why you're attemtping to gather a 'pack'? Still, I guess you mask yourself well enough to fit in, hence all your bile here.
Keep swinging n*****.
Its good exercise for the real thing.
Doesn't stop you from trying, n*****, and then watching intently for any sign that you might have hit the mark.
Don't be silly! Do you think I think you'd show as such? I'm just giving like-for-like, you can hang yourself as you like.
i can't, I'm blind to color. I'm enlightened, I can't discriminate.
Remind me not to have a meal cooked by you then.
to the only one that matters, n*****.
Who would be?
Is it? Am I "worried" n*****? Am I afraid?
Don't know? Its why I asked. Your words show great bile and anger but, so far, I'm still not sure at who? The 'herd' or the 'wolves' and who is running this Freudian marketing machine?
I know, a civilized healthy n*****, like you, would just sit silently by as bullshit is uttered as if it made sense, but I'm a human being n*****, not a n*****, like you and your kind, and so when lies are all around me I am motivated to speak out.
Are you? BB says that on your blog your express no such language as you express here. So its a selective motivation?
No, I was a prince with a golden spoon up my asshole. That's where my homophobia stems from...and my misogyny and my necrophiliophobia.
Mate, I don't actually care where your phobias came from, its that you appear to wish to impose the consequences of your reactions upon all?
That's me, n*****....a swing and a ......oooooo another miss.
Like I say, it could be multiple stories and I'm not much bothered as they only arise due to my understanding of the foulness I understand in your words. And it ain't the niggers.
Civilization, n*****.
Which one monkey-boy?
n*****, imagine me waiting with baited breathe hanging from your every word....lurking in the shadows.
As if.
How can I be disappointed from the expected, n*****? like being disappointed that the n***** **** posts something with no naive dualism in it, and no references to "good" and "justice" and....let us not forget "love".
Ah! Now I do feel sad as it sounds like we were getting to know each other here.
And so it ends n*****.

:(
Boo fucking hoo...

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:46 pm
by Barbara Brooks
Aetixintro,

Happy New Year to you. I am not sure what you mean ?

Barbara

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 10:51 pm
by Arising_uk
Aetixintro wrote:...It looks like a mammoth task to give a summary of this thread? Happy New Year! :)
I'd have thought the summary was easy? The 'world' is as we make it.
p.s.
given a whole chunk of boundary conditions.
p.p.s
plus the problem with thinking and thoughting or 'thunking' in the slang.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:05 pm
by Aetixintro
Barbara Brooks
What exactly is it you're not sure of what I mean? You'll have to deepen your request for an answer from me. The meaning of my very short post should be clear. Yes? :)

Arising_uk
:D
To some extent, I agree, but it should be possible to describe it without latching on to general rules that contain just that description. Yes, I want the answers to my post. If the 2 questions can't be answered, I just need the acknowledgement of this. I mean, this thread is going on its 96th page. It begins to look useless and I suspect the author of it has lost the oversight over it. Its content is now obscure.

Sorry if I'm rude! :oops:

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:13 pm
by Barbara Brooks
Well it is not.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:39 pm
by Arising_uk
Aetixintro wrote:Arising_uk
:D
To some extent, I agree, but it should be possible to describe it without latching on to general rules that contain just that description. Yes, I want the answers to my post. If the 2 questions can't be answered, I just need the acknowledgement of this. I mean, this thread is going on its 96th page. It begins to look useless and I suspect the author of it has lost the oversight over it. Its content is now obscure.

Sorry if I'm rude! :oops:
Not at all mate. Many have tilted at this windmill, myself included and I've done it a couple of times now. What makes me smile is that we left at least the amount here behind when we switched forums(I'm tempted to ask Admin whether we could pre-append that lot :) ).

Have you read the 'germans'? If so I think you should be able to understand how BB was affected. But read the first post(whoops! :oops: "first few posts") she made in this new thread(as it is). Never to say anything upon this forum that she did not consider true. Try that on philosophically.

So whilst I disagree with what I think may be behind her posts I am truly beginning to understand the effect she has upon others.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:45 pm
by Aetixintro
Arising_uk
Those are kind words on behalf of Barbara Brooks! I think you're a man and if you are, I think you're a Gentleman! You come across better than most! I appreciate that in people! Take care! :)

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:52 pm
by Arising_uk
Safe yourself mate.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2010 11:58 pm
by Aetixintro
Is that "Save yourself mate."? Alright. Sure, I look after myself! :|

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:27 am
by Arising_uk
Aetixintro wrote:Is that "Save yourself mate."? Alright. Sure, I look after myself! :|
nah! 'Jamaican' London, as in "You look after yourself, ya 'ear!", as in, "I care a bit". :D Happy New Year.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 12:41 am
by Aetixintro
I was beginning to worry a little. Yes! Still a Happy New Year to you as well! :)

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 9:02 pm
by Barbara Brooks
Midway between knowledge and truth is reason. Come all ye noble thinkers raise out of unconsciousness into world spirit exalts great ideas, and think away those negative viewpoints.

World spirit has power set over the intellectual world and the visible world the gift of knowledge, which comes on the scene and liberates mind spirit to carry out reason.

Goethe believed, If you want to describe a thing, you must leave it alone, adjust to it in order to grasp the spirit of it, gather it’s meaning. This is not the affair of the imagination, but of scientific statement of specific characters and subject matter.

We cannot continue to be an ignorant and pass off Nature as some other, or that we are other then Nature.

Philosophy is wholly to the upholding of truth, don’t let those ordinary goods of life’ beauty, wealth, rank, and connections corrupt and distract be a useful handy helper for the greater good.

Philosophers have tasted how sweet and blessed knowledge is and has seen enough of the madness of the crowd; and know there is no champion of justice whose side to fight and save.

Only in rhythm and harmony do we find harmony, the exact musical notes, the philosopher must harmonize and know the essential forms of temperance, courage, freedom, magnificence, and their kindred. Everything in harmony flows like a gentle wind from a purer region

We sentient creatures feel is the absolute supreme wealth of being because in feeling everything is reduced, Joy, pain, any mental feeling, seeing and hearing, etc. simply in communion with self. Our space our time lies in our own power, we affirm our place; but we cannot escape the determinations of place, gravity.

The high privilege of feeling show self feeling by emitting a cry when feeling pain, need, hunger, repletion, pleasure, joyfulness, in heat horses neigh, insects hum, cats purr or the voice of birds when they launch forth into song while soaring freely in the air feelings quivering within.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Sun Jan 03, 2010 5:02 pm
by Barbara Brooks
We sentient creatures ideally are ideally free from gravity, we spontaneously determine our place and display self-movement as in voice’s free vibration within self we feel ; Self is for self that is the absolute characteristic feature, ideal activity within self.

Gravity has its determination only in other. we do not occupy a particular place as a result of some outside determination, because we turn back into self merely relate to nature. Therefore , we stand on our own distinguishes ourtself from nature, But . even though we can not escape from gravity .

What terminates the direction of falling is Gravity a pendulum swing both falling and thrusting at the same time. Now thrusting is the deviation from the direction of falling. Weight is only one moment of the motion of falling, whereas thrusting is both falling and throwing the same time.

Gravity has the power that brings thrusting to rest; the oscillation terminates to the direction of falling. Bodies, which are unsupported, fall. Weight exercises no influence in free falling motion. The law of accelerated motion is purely uniform conforming to a rule. A feather does not fall like a lead bullet, but it is because of the resistance they encounter; a rock for instance falls faster in air than in water. If a body falls more than 15 feet in the first second in two seconds the body falls 135 feet or 9x15. Thus, velocity increases in time.

If a cannon ball were thrust with great pressure it would fly off in a tangent but everything encounters resistance is reduced to gravity.

Re: Philosophy of Mind

Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 7:23 pm
by Barbara Brooks
The feather does not fall like a lead bullet, but because of gravity

Newtonian law of gravity is only part of the universal gravitational motion; moon is only a part of gravitational force. Newton merely generalized gravity by giving it a visible example such as the apple falling from the tree.

It was Kepler founded planets impel them toward the sun. Laplace proved everything turns on a path is an ellipse motion but it who showed not only an elliptic but also the force which keeps the planets in orbit not Newton.

Johannes Kepler was born December 27, 1571 in Weil, Germany, with the help of , Tycho Brahe, born December 14, 1546, Nicolaus Copernicus, born February 19, 1473, and William Gilbert, born May 24, 1540 came up withe the Law of Celestral Motion.

Copernicus learned in Greek was astronomer, philosopher, jurist and physician. Copernicus was the first to show the sun is at mid part. Pythagorean, (569–475 BC) commonly given as birth dates spoke of sun the innermost point of the sphere as the midpoint or center. Aristotle too believed that if the world were spherical would equally need the light of the sun and heat, and then it would be best for the sun to be at midpoint.

Copernicus believed sun the center of the universe this is similar to a mobile the sun moving around the center. He demonstrates earth as a moving planet and put the immovable sun at the center of the universe.

The spangled heavens should be used as a pattern excellent fashioned by the hand of some great artist. Any geometrician who sees them appreciates the exquisiteness worships them. The true astronomers look at the movements of the stars in heaven and know it is framed in perfect manner.