For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
I didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
I'm thinkin' there's a lot you're not realizin'.Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:50 pmI didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
You asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:50 pmI didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
give 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pmYou asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".Lacewing wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 8:50 pmI didn't realize you were so full of projections and false conclusions.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 7:00 pm Hey, you asked...
...I answered. if you don't like, agree with, or understand my answer: that ain't my problem.
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
Do neither of you understand the difference between thinking and projecting?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:27 pmgive 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pmYou asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
I often think the same about you. We just have different viewpoints and methods. I've acknowledged the things I agree with you on -- but you seem less inclined to do so, instead arguing or presenting your 'more accurate answer'?
I just ask CLARIFYING QUESTIONS, from the Truly OPEN perspective, EQUALLY to EVERY one here.henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:27 pmgive 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pmYou asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
I have a perspective, which, obviously, might be very different from your perspective of the difference between those two things.Lacewing wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 5:33 amDo neither of you understand the difference between thinking and projecting?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 10:27 pmgive 'er hell, ageAge wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 9:44 pm
You asked "henry quirk" what "henry quirk" thinks you are not seeing "lacewing", so "henry quirk" does what you ask for. But, instead of just accepting that that is what "Henry quirk" thinks or sees, you go straight into your usual accusations of "projecting" and "false conclusions".
If you do NOT want to hear the truth, from "another's" perspective, especially in regards to 'you', then I suggest that you do NOT ask them what they think, nor see.
Also, when "another" is just expressing their honest thoughts, in this forum, and you have this constant accussation of 'projecting', have you ever stopped to consider that you are 'projecting' AS WELL?
Do you feel a 'need' to be informed when one agrees with you or would you like to be informed when we agree with you?
Where all the integers lead is uncaused cause . Do you and Immanuel agree?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:07 am Here's an experiment demonstrating it.
Get yourself a piece of paper.
On it, write "0"
But before you write "0", this experiment requires you first have to have already written "-1."
But before you write "-1", you have to already have written "-2".
And before that, you already have to have written "-3", "-4", "-5," and so on, back to infinity.
That models an infinite regress of causes, because each integer is a prerequisite for the next one, just like each cause in an infinite regress is the prerequisite of the effect associated with it.
So just sit down with some paper, and try to do it.
And then respond as soon as you've managed to write "0," or when you realize the truth: that there will never come a point when you can write even a single integer, let alone reach the "0" point (i.e. the present).
And just as you can never start writing, so too a universe can never begin if it requires an infinite chain of causes.
who is which?RCSaunders wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:39 pm"Down to earth," vs. "away with the fairies."
If you mean: do we agree that God is the unmoved mover?Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 11:41 amWhere all the integers lead is uncaused cause . Do you and Immanuel agree?henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Dec 05, 2021 3:07 am Here's an experiment demonstrating it.
Get yourself a piece of paper.
On it, write "0"
But before you write "0", this experiment requires you first have to have already written "-1."
But before you write "-1", you have to already have written "-2".
And before that, you already have to have written "-3", "-4", "-5," and so on, back to infinity.
That models an infinite regress of causes, because each integer is a prerequisite for the next one, just like each cause in an infinite regress is the prerequisite of the effect associated with it.
So just sit down with some paper, and try to do it.
And then respond as soon as you've managed to write "0," or when you realize the truth: that there will never come a point when you can write even a single integer, let alone reach the "0" point (i.e. the present).
And just as you can never start writing, so too a universe can never begin if it requires an infinite chain of causes.
short bus makin' way for short busAge wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 10:29 amDo you feel a 'need' to be informed when one agrees with you or would you like to be informed when we agree with you?
If yes, then I will pay more attention of doing this, for you.
Good question. What do you think?henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Dec 06, 2021 2:43 pmwho is which?
