Philosophy Now Forum

Arising_uk wrote:Why does the boozo not do this himself and get back to us with the replies. As its getting very boring hearing about it here.

Translation: Arising_uk has neither the balls nor the ovaries (take your pick!) to do it himself/herself. You wouldn't believe my response, so why even mention it!

bobevenson wrote:

Arising_uk wrote:Why does the boozo not do this himself and get back to us with the replies. As its getting very boring hearing about it here.

Translation: Arising_uk has neither the balls nor the ovaries (take your pick!) to do it himself/herself. You wouldn't believe my response, so why even mention it!

But you know we don't believe a word you say and as far as I've noticed you've failed to convince a single person on this forum that what you say is true so why do you keep mentioning it? Are you just not getting enough attention elsewhere that you can't resist all the "me, me, me!!!" posts you keep making here?

Check out the letter from the business reporter who covered P&G for the Cincinnati Enquirer (http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/cincinnati-enquirer.pdf). She wanted to do an investigative story on a possible illegal conspiracy between P&G and an FBI investigation of me even before I published "That Infamous Logo". Most people would be afraid of the FBI, but it's the FBI who's afraid of me, and that goes double for P&G! (Chaz is like my little sock puppet!)

Did anyone check out the letter? it is dated January, 1988. I don't understand him, is he sane?

reasonvemotion wrote:I don't understand him, is he sane?

I think some of us suspect not.

reasonvemotion wrote:

Check out the letter from the business reporter who covered P&G for the Cincinnati Enquirer (http://church-of-ouzo.com/pdf/cincinnati-enquirer.pdf). She wanted to do an investigative story on a possible illegal conspiracy between P&G and an FBI investigation of me even before I published "That Infamous Logo". Most people would be afraid of the FBI, but it's the FBI who's afraid of me, and that goes double for P&G! (Chaz is like my little sock puppet!)

Did anyone check out the letter? it is dated January, 1988. I don't understand him, is he sane?

I think were to to take a poll Most would say no, and the rest would suspect his sanity.

The same day P&G sent me an angry and threatening letter, the FBI came knocking at my door, but I guarantee you they never did it again (they didn't realize they were dealing with Bob the Baptist, O my brothers in tribulation!).

You are asking a nonsensical question, which is why Comrade Chaz attempted to answer it. There is no way to measure who was braver.

ForgedinHell wrote:You are asking a nonsensical question, which is why Comrade Chaz attempted to answer it. There is no way to measure who was braver.

The moron shoots himself in the foot by attempting the question himself.

chaz wyman wrote:
Was he anymore 'brave' than Gandhi or Nelson Mandela.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.




Yes, that's why I called him, The Bravest Philosopher of Our Time...




.

Erm! Nelson Mandela came after King and much closer to our time.

Hell, he is still alive, he is our time.

BTY I wouldn't call either a philosopher, I would call Mandela a bit braver, this was a the torturous murderous South African regime he was fighting.

Grendel wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:
Was he anymore 'brave' than Gandhi or Nelson Mandela.

Bill Wiltrack wrote:.




Yes, that's why I called him, The Bravest Philosopher of Our Time...




.

Erm! Nelson Mandela came after King and much closer to our time.

Hell, he is still alive, he is our time.

BTY I wouldn't call either a philosopher, I would call Mandela a bit braver, this was a the torturous murderous South African regime he was fighting.

Gandhi also fought the S African regime until he was thrown out, I don't see how you can really compare. MLK gave his life, as did Gandhi, and they knew the risks. But giving 24 years of your life incarcerated whilst he could have recanted and gone free at any time takes resolve.
I don't know what it means to be brave, and not sure if such a quality is measurable.

chaz wyman wrote:

ForgedinHell wrote:You are asking a nonsensical question, which is why Comrade Chaz attempted to answer it. There is no way to measure who was braver.

The moron shoots himself in the foot by attempting the question himself.

Chaz, I realize that you think calling me a "moron" is somehow an intellectual position to take, but trust me on this, it isn't. A small child with little brain power could write "moron" on here. That's the level you are at on this forum, that of a mere child.

ForgedinHell wrote:

chaz wyman wrote:

ForgedinHell wrote:You are asking a nonsensical question, which is why Comrade Chaz attempted to answer it. There is no way to measure who was braver.

The moron shoots himself in the foot by attempting the question himself.

Chaz, I realize that you think calling me a "moron" is somehow an intellectual position to take, but trust me on this, it isn't. A small child with little brain power could write "moron" on here. That's the level you are at on this forum, that of a mere child.

I'll never take the advice of a moron, especially one who says 'trust me on this'.
If you don't want to be thought of as a moron then try to avoid saying moronic things.

chaz wyman wrote:

I'll never take the advice of a moron, especially one who says 'trust me on this'.
If you don't want to be thought of as a moron then try to avoid saying moronic things.

Chaz, you have been writing moronic things on here for ages. You are an idiot, which, by definition, is dumber than a moron. You have written the following on here, which are just brief examples of you being a moron:

1. You listed three names, and claimed repeatedly, that you proved the Jews control the US economy by the mere listing of those three names.

2. You wrote that I am a walking fool for claiming to be an atheist and a Jew; however, you have claimed on here to be an atheist and a Jew, which, by your own claim, would make you a walking fool.

3. When I pointed out that Einstein stated one may be a Jew and an atheist, your response was we could ignore his opinion solely because he was an American citizen. As if Einstein's citizenship has anything to do with whether his statement was correct.

I can go on, but any rational-thinking person should get the point: You are irrational.

.



50 years after the death of MLK he is now inseparable within the fabric of American history.

Martin Luther King; his ideas, his philosophies live & breathe in all of us today.






You can kill a man but you can't kill an idea.
~~~ Medgar Evers ~~~

.

Sorry, it's only been 45 years, it just seems like 50.