Philosophy Now Forum

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:16 pm Absolutely NO sign of a personality of ANY description whatsoever.

There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

_______

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:16 pm Absolutely NO sign of a personality of ANY description whatsoever.

There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

_______

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:16 pm Absolutely NO sign of a personality of ANY description whatsoever.

There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

LOL HOW MANY TIMES DOES 'this one' HAVE TO BE INFORMED that its OWN INTERPRETATION is NOT Right, BEFORE some thing is TRIGGERED WITHIN 'it' TO BECOME INQUISITIVE, OPEN, and CURIOS, once again?

ONCE MORE, FOR those who are Truly INTERESTED, "seeds" could NOT have MISINTERPRETED things MORE Wrongly, here.

Also, what can be CLEARLY SEEN, here, is that 'these people', back in the 'olden days' when this was being written, would MUCH PREFER TO talk ABOUT 'others', FROM the OWN ALREADY OBTAINED 'judgments', NO MATTER HOW Wrong or False 'their judgments' were MADE FROM their OWN 'made up' MISINTERPRETATIONS.

As can be CLEARLY SEEN, here, FROM 'the older ones' there was ABSOLUTELY NO OPENNESS NOR CURIOSITY LEFT. 'they' just MUCH PREFERRED TO EXPRESS, and have their OWN OPINIONS and/or OWN BELIEFS LISTENED TO, and HEARD.

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

_______

What can be CLEARLY SEEN, here, IF EVER ASKED FOR, is WHERE, EXACTLY, 'this one' has MADE THE ABSOLUTE MISINTERPRETATION, and as such has 'MADE UP' its OWN False and MISLEADING INTERPRETATION. Which it, OBVIOUSLY, WANTS TO EXPRESS, and HAVE others BELIEVE and ACCEPT its OWN Wrong AND False INTERPRETATION. EXACTLY like HOW "accelafine" DESPERATELY WANTS others TO ACCEPT and BELIEVE its OWN False AND Wrong INTERPRETATION that "age" is A 'bot'.

'This' WANTING others TO ACCEPT and BELIEVE the EXACT SAME Falsehoods that they, "themselves", ACCEPT and BELIEVE, was A VERY COMMON TRAIT among the 'elder', BACK in the days when this WAS being written.

If ABSOLUTELY ANY was TO READ what is quoted, here, FROM the Truly OPEN perspective, and NOT FROM pre-existing thoughts, beliefs, nor presumptions, then what can be VERY CLEARLY SEEN is HOW "seeds" has, AGAIN, CONCLUDED, ABSOLUTELY, the VERY Wrong thing that it HAS, here.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm
There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

_______

How do you know this?

SEE, here, HOW there is NOT a shred of CURIOSITY LEFT within 'this one'.

There is NOT A SHRED of DOUBT AT ALL. There is NO PONDERING OVER, 'Could this be true?' Instead there is just a, 'How do you KNOW this'?

LOL

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'.

Did you even TRY TO LOOK?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Could have 'this one' EVER CONCLUDED or IMAGINED some thing wrong or false, here?

Also, and AGAIN, SEE how 'these people' would ONLY 'see things', which ALIGN TO their PRE-EXISTING VIEWS and/or BELIEFS, ONLY.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:24 am Be gone damn dirty bot

LOL 'This one' was just INFORMED BY another that I am NOT a 'bot'. To which it even replied, 'How do you know this?'

But, BECAUSE its 'current', anyway, BELIEF is that 'I' AM A 'bot', 'this one' can NOT SEE ANY thing OTHER THAN 'I AM A DIRTY BOT'.

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:28 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:24 am Be gone damn dirty bot

LOL 'This one' was just INFORMED BY another that I am NOT a 'bot'. To which it even replied, 'How do you know this?'

But, BECAUSE its 'current', anyway, BELIEF is that 'I' AM A 'bot', 'this one' can NOT SEE ANY thing OTHER THAN 'I AM A DIRTY BOT'.

No, he said you were 'Ken' which is what I was asking how he would know that. If he's not going to post a link then why would I bother? You really aren't interesting, just fucking annoying. What could be less interesting to humans than a 'bot'?

Age wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 11:13 pm

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:16 pm Absolutely NO sign of a personality of ANY description whatsoever.

There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

ONCE AGAIN, MORE OBVIOUS ABSOLUTE LIES, which as AGAIN and ALWAYS is proved absolutely True.

Oh shit, I must have been thinking of someone else. My bad!

However, did you have a favorite toy when you were a child?

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

Okay look, I relate to this. I have myself been responsible for many (most) of the important texts. Aeschylus for example. A lot of Plato (The Laws). Herodotus.

These are just a few.

ONCE AGAIN, MORE OBVIOUS ABSOLUTE LIES, which as AGAIN and ALWAYS is proved absolutely True.

Can you elaborate? Lies that are proved true is such an interesting field. I am pretty knowledgeable here. DM me, please.

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:46 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am
Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

Okay look, I relate to this. I have myself been responsible for many (most) of the important texts. Aeschylus for example. A lot of Plato (The Laws). Herodotus.

These are just a few.

He's 'trans'? A transbot? How fascinating

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:31 am

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:28 am

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:24 am Be gone damn dirty bot

LOL 'This one' was just INFORMED BY another that I am NOT a 'bot'. To which it even replied, 'How do you know this?'

But, BECAUSE its 'current', anyway, BELIEF is that 'I' AM A 'bot', 'this one' can NOT SEE ANY thing OTHER THAN 'I AM A DIRTY BOT'.

No, he said you were 'Ken' which is what I was asking how he would know that.

GREAT. I KNEW there would be 'A WAY' to GET 'this one', or 'these people', TO JUST CLARIFY, WITHOUT ASKING 'them', DIRECTLY, CLARIFYING QUESTIONS. So, thank you FOR CLARIFYING, here.

Now, considering you CLASS "yourself" as the BEST, MOST ACCURATE, and MOST KNOWLEDGE one, here, regarding 'writing' and the CORRECT WAY TO 'write', then WHY do you NOT WRITE CLEARLY, here?

WHY do you SPEAK and WRITE 'in ways' that are NOT EXPRESSING what you ACTUALLY MEAN/T, ABSOLUTELY PRECISELY, CONCISELY, nor CLEARLY?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:31 am If he's not going to post a link then why would I bother?

WHY would you, supposedly, 'bother' about 'what', EXACTLY?

Do you KNOW HOW TO EXPRESS "yourself" CLEARLY, and SUCCINCTLY?

HOW "seeds" KNOWS that 'the one' writing under the label "age" was writing under the label "ken" is BECAUSE:

It has always been BLATANTLY OBVIOUS.

AND, if you had just DONE A VERY QUICK CHECK, then you, ALSO, COULD HAVE NOTICED and SEEN 'this'?

By the way, that 'the one' writing under the label "age" ALSO wrote under the label "ken" IS, and WAS, as BLATANTLY OBVIOUS as 'the one' writing under the label "accelafine" ALSO wrote under the label "vegetariantaxidermy", AS WELL.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:31 am You really aren't interesting, just fucking annoying.

If 'you' OR 'i' are or are not so-called 'interesting' has NO REAL BEARING ON ABSOLUTELY ANY thing, here.

Are 'you' BEING 'interesting' informing people on A 'philosophy forum', of ALL places, what you FIND or do NOT FIND so-called 'interesting'?

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 1:31 am What could be less interesting to humans than a 'bot'?

LOL

It is you 'human being' who WANT, and USE, 'bots'.

Anyway, what could be 'less interesting', to 'human beings', is 'you' INFORMING 'them' of what you FIND, or do NOT FIND, so-called 'interesting'.

accelafine wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:55 am

seeds wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 12:50 am

Alexis Jacobi wrote: ↑Tue Feb 18, 2025 10:47 pm
There were however a series of posts, I forgot where, in which he wrote moving prose (no capitals mind you) about one of his first childhood toys: a red fire engine with an extending ladder and a hose that actually squirted. I thought it was quite touching. But I might be getting soft.

Age is not a bot.

No, Age (aka, "Ken") is an ancient, channeled entity who claims to have helped inspire the writing of the Bible.

Ken (aka, Age) wrote the following back in 2017:

"...This impatience comes out and through the one, which I am using, who is writing this. This is a bit like how the ones, I used who wrote the bible, misinterpreted what I was actually trans and in spiring to them, which obviously has caused a lot of confusion. Now I found another human being who I can use to share things..."

_______

How do you know this? There doesn't seem to be a member called 'Ken'. Looks like this 'Ken' is ripping off panpsychism to make himself appear 'mysterious'. How mature.

Ken (or "ken") changed his forum moniker to Age back in 2018.

Here is the 2017 post from "ken" that the quote is taken from...

viewtopic.php?p=319795&hilit=spiring#p3 ... %20with%2C

Notice how Age is complaining about my interpretation of that excerpt, but doesn't make the slightest effort to clarify what he "really" meant.

I try not to get drawn into Age's/ken's nonsense, but sometimes I can't help myself, because even though (for whatever reason) he is clearly oblivious and too lacking in self-awareness to realize it, he, in essence, is a forum bully who constantly ridicules pretty much everyone here with his incessant and juvenile use of "LOLs" in response to most of our comments.

I don't like bullies, which is why I come down hard on him from time to time - even though it is an exercise in futility.
_______

Age wrote: ↑Wed Feb 19, 2025 2:13 am

I know I'm pathetic AND I keep lying BECAUSE I'm evolving and practicing how to lie better. I'm so SORRY.

FFS.