New Discovery

[FlashDangerpants]

That's okay. You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make him drink. Only time will tell.

I am helping you keep your dead thread afloat, so you are getting what you really want.

Peacegirl: No you’re not trying to help me. More bullshit!

Fkashdangerpants: I am only doing it to help submerge some needy shit that VA and eggnog7 are posting, so I don't need to care about the content.

You flog your dead horse as much as you want, I don't care.

Peacegirl: I know you don’t care so don’t lie by telling me you’re trying to help me stay afloat. You speak out of bith sides of your mouth. I don't know who eggnot7 and VA are, so don't compare this thread to anyone else. GOT IT?????

You don't know who anyone is because you are a salesperson and this thread is the only one you are using to sell, so you look at no others and have no community role or existence.

I will compare your thread to those of any fraudster, mental patient, or utter nobody I feel like.

[peacegirl]

I am helping you keep your dead thread afloat, so you are getting what you really want.

Peacegirl: No you’re not trying to help me. More bullshit!

Fkashdangerpants: I am only doing it to help submerge some needy shit that VA and eggnog7 are posting, so I don't need to care about the content.

You flog your dead horse as much as you want, I don't care.

Peacegirl: I know you don’t care so don’t lie by telling me you’re trying to help me stay afloat. You speak out of bith sides of your mouth. I don't know who eggnot7 and VA are, so don't compare this thread to anyone else. GOT IT?????

You don't know who anyone is because you are a salesperson and this thread is the only one you are using to sell, so you look at no others and have no community role or existence.

I will compare your thread to those of any fraudster, mental patient, or utter nobody I feel like.

You can do whatever you want, but it proves nothing. I don’t have time to have a community role in the way you expect. Another false charge. How low can you go FlashDangerpants when you really don’t know whether this knowledge is valid or not. You just don’t!

[FlashDangerpants]

You don't know who anyone is because you are a salesperson and this thread is the only one you are using to sell, so you look at no others and have no community role or existence.

I will compare your thread to those of any fraudster, mental patient, or utter nobody I feel like.

You can do whatever you want, but it proves nothing. I don’t have time to have a community role in the way you expect. Another false charge. How low can you go FlashDangerpants when you really don’t know whether this knowledge is valid or not. You just don’t!

It's not at all a false charge. You are not involved in any conversations that aren't about people buying something from you. None at all.

But it's ok.





Nobody cares.

[peacegirl]

You don't know who anyone is because you are a salesperson and this thread is the only one you are using to sell, so you look at no others and have no community role or existence.

I will compare your thread to those of any fraudster, mental patient, or utter nobody I feel like.

You can do whatever you want, but it proves nothing. I don’t have time to have a community role in the way you expect. Another false charge. How low can you go FlashDangerpants when you really don’t know whether this knowledge is valid or not. You just don’t!

It's not at all a false charge. You are not involved in any conversations that aren't about people buying something from you. None at all.

But it's ok.

Nobody cares.

That's actually not true. I gave everyone the first three chapters, and no one read them. You are way off.

https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:s ... b35b0724b3

[FlashDangerpants]

You can do whatever you want, but it proves nothing. I don’t have time to have a community role in the way you expect. Another false charge. How low can you go FlashDangerpants when you really don’t know whether this knowledge is valid or not. You just don’t!

It's not at all a false charge. You are not involved in any conversations that aren't about people buying something from you. None at all.

But it's ok.

Nobody cares.

That's actually not true. I gave everyone the first three chapters, and no one read them. You are way off.

https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:s ... b35b0724b3

You only did that to sell your book. I read them. That's two lies you just tried to tell me.

But nobody cares, and nobody is going to buy your book.

[peacegirl]

It's not at all a false charge. You are not involved in any conversations that aren't about people buying something from you. None at all.

But it's ok.

Nobody cares.

That's actually not true. I gave everyone the first three chapters, and no one read them. You are way off.

https://acrobat.adobe.com/id/urn:aaid:s ... b35b0724b3

You only did that to sell your book. I read them. That's two lies you just tried to tell me.

PEACEGIRL: I did not only do that to sell my book. I did that to see if people understood what they read, because if they did, they would have been excited to read more. You will not let go of the belief that moving in the direction of greater satisfaction is nothing more than a tautology (with no further value) and that he used the words 'mathematical, scientific, and undeniable' interchangeably, which you didn't like. Even if this new world became a reality, and peace prevailed, you would probably still maintain that he was wrong because "greater satisfaction" is a tautology.

In order for this discovery to be adequately understood, the reader must not apply himself and his ideas as a standard of what is true and false but understand the difference between a mathematical relation and an opinion, belief, or theory. The mind of man is so utterly confused with words that it will require painstaking clarification to clear away the logical cobwebs of ignorance that have accumulated through the years. For purposes of clarification, please note that the words “scientific” and “mathematical” only mean “undeniable” and are interchanged throughout the text. The reasoning in this work is not a form of logic, nor is it my opinion of the answer; it is mathematical, scientific, and undeniable, and it is not necessary to deal with what has been termed the “exact sciences” to be exact and scientific. Consequently, it is imperative to know that this demonstration will be like a game of chess in which every one of your moves will be forced and checkmate inevitable, but only if you don’t make up your own rules as to what is true and false, which will only delay the very life you want for yourself.

The laws of this universe, which include those of our nature, are the rules of the game, and the only thing required to win, to bring about this Golden Age that will benefit everyone… is to stick to the rules. But if you decide to move the king like the queen because it does not satisfy you to see a pet belief slipping away or because it irritates your pride to be proven wrong or checkmated, then it is obvious that you are not sincerely concerned with learning the truth but only with retaining your doctrines at all costs. However, when it is scientifically revealed that the very things religion, government, education, and all others want, which include the means as well as the end, are prevented from becoming a reality only because we have not penetrated deeply enough into a thorough understanding of our ultimate nature, are we given a choice as to the direction we are compelled to travel even though this means the relinquishing of ideas that have been part of our thinking since time immemorial? This discovery will be presented in a step-by-step fashion that brooks no opposition. Your awareness of this matter will preclude the possibility of someone adducing his rank, title, affiliation, or the long tenure of an accepted belief as a standard from which he thinks he qualifies to disagree with knowledge that contains within itself undeniable proof of its veracity. In other words, your background, the color of your skin, your religion, the number of years you went to school, how many titles you hold, your IQ, your country, what you do for a living, your being some kind of expert like Nageli (or anything else you care to throw in) has no relation whatsoever to the undeniable knowledge that 3 is to 6 what 4 is to 8. So please don’t be too hasty in using what you have been taught as a standard to judge what has not even been revealed to you yet. If you should decide to give me the benefit of the doubt — deny it — and two other discoveries to be revealed if you can.

But nobody cares, and nobody is going to buy your book.

PEACEGIRL: I don't care if they buy the book. It's their loss, truly. You have a wrong conception of me because you feel positive that this can't be a genuine discovery. It's unfortunate.

[FlashDangerpants]

Not buying anything from you.

[Age]

I never said here that MY VIEWS are necessarily true, right, accurate, or correct. But this discovery is all of those things.
Why people are pissed when I say this is not my problem.

Age: That you do not take on a single word that any one has pointed out to you, here, is not our issue either.

Peacegirl: “Taking on a single word that anyone has said” to you means admitting it’s not a discovery. That would make you happy but it would be wrong because it IS A DISCOVERY!

Age: Look, if people are not agreeing with and accepting what you call, 'this discovery', might be because what you and "your" daddy thought of as being 'a discovery' might not necessarily be, at all, as well as not be as great as you two imagine it is.

Peacegirl: “The fact that people are not agreeing with and accepting me and “my daddy” (calling him “my daddy” is sarcastic and shows me, once again that you are using that he was my father as a reason to reject what you have no knowledge of) might not necessarily be as great as we two imagine it to be” is plain old skepticism that has gotten out of control. It’s like people being skeptical when I make the claim that one plus one is two. This knowledge is not a theory, not a conjecture, nor is it an opinion. Do you actually think I would work this hard to get people to listen if it were just an opinion?

Age: If you can not take on any feedback at all, then do not be surprised that no one appears to be interested in what you claim was 'a discovery', years and years ago, and which you claim is 'all of those things'.

Peacegirl: Once again: Receiving feedback to you means agreeing that it’s not a discovery.

you are, once more, making False claims in regards to me, which means, once more, that it is actually you who does not know what it is talking about.

I won’t do that because it IS a discovery,

What was a so-called 'discovery' to "your" daddy is not necessarily a discovery to others. Some of 'us' already new 'that' anyway.

I agree that 'that' may well been 'a discovery' to "your" father, but so what?

and if that pisses you off, what can I say?

Consider that what you are presuming, and/or believing, here, is not even close to the Truth, then 'that' certainly does not, and could not, 'piss me off', as you call it.

In fact not a single word that you have presented, here, has 'pissed me off'.

[peacegirl]

Not buying anything from you.

Actually, you should not buy the book. You said you read the first three chapters. So what is the discovery? Do you even know?

[peacegirl]

Age: That you do not take on a single word that any one has pointed out to you, here, is not our issue either.

Peacegirl: “Taking on a single word that anyone has said” to you means admitting it’s not a discovery. That would make you happy but it would be wrong because it IS A DISCOVERY!

Age: Look, if people are not agreeing with and accepting what you call, 'this discovery', might be because what you and "your" daddy thought of as being 'a discovery' might not necessarily be, at all, as well as not be as great as you two imagine it is.

Peacegirl: “The fact that people are not agreeing with and accepting me and “my daddy” (calling him “my daddy” is sarcastic and shows me, once again that you are using that he was my father as a reason to reject what you have no knowledge of) might not necessarily be as great as we two imagine it to be” is plain old skepticism that has gotten out of control. It’s like people being skeptical when I make the claim that one plus one is two. This knowledge is not a theory, not a conjecture, nor is it an opinion. Do you actually think I would work this hard to get people to listen if it were just an opinion?

Age: If you can not take on any feedback at all, then do not be surprised that no one appears to be interested in what you claim was 'a discovery', years and years ago, and which you claim is 'all of those things'.

Peacegirl: Once again: Receiving feedback to you means agreeing that it’s not a discovery.

Age: you are, once more, making False claims in regards to me, which means, once more, that it is actually you who does not know what it is talking about.

I won’t do that because it IS a discovery,

Age: What was a so-called 'discovery' to "your" daddy is not necessarily a discovery to others. Some of 'us' already new 'that' anyway.

I agree that 'that' may well been 'a discovery' to "your" father, but so what?

and if that pisses you off, what can I say?

Age: Consider that what you are presuming, and/or believing, here, is not even close to the Truth, then 'that' certainly does not, and could not, 'piss me off', as you call it.

In fact not a single word that you have presented, here, has 'pissed me off'.

Peacegirl: You want me to admit it's not a discovery. You said this may have been a so-called discovery to my father, but not necessarily to others. Discoveries don't work like that. If a discovery is true, it's true for everyone, regardless of who agrees with it or not.

[FlashDangerpants]

Not buying anything from you.

Actually, you should not buy the book. You said you read the first three chapters. So what is the discovery? Do you even know?

I read your first three chapters and I raised questions and you had nothing. We're not bothering to do that again.

I will help you keep your desperate little thread going because it will piss off some other charlatans though.

[Age]

Peacegirl: Once again: Receiving feedback to you means agreeing that it’s not a discovery.

Age: you are, once more, making False claims in regards to me, which means, once more, that it is actually you who does not know what it is talking about.

I won’t do that because it IS a discovery,

Age: What was a so-called 'discovery' to "your" daddy is not necessarily a discovery to others. Some of 'us' already new 'that' anyway.

I agree that 'that' may well been 'a discovery' to "your" father, but so what?

and if that pisses you off, what can I say?

Age: Consider that what you are presuming, and/or believing, here, is not even close to the Truth, then 'that' certainly does not, and could not, 'piss me off', as you call it.

In fact not a single word that you have presented, here, has 'pissed me off'.

Peacegirl: You want me to admit it's not a discovery. You said this may have been a so-called discovery to my father, but not necessarily to others. Discoveries don't work like that. If a discovery is true, it's true for everyone, regardless of who agrees with it or not.

you, once again, have missed the point.

What one may consider to be 'a discovery', to them, may well have already be known, to another.

So, 'a discovery' may well be 'true', but only in regards 'to some', and not necessarily in regards 'to all'.

One day you might come to realise, and/or discover, this True Fact.

[peacegirl]

Not buying anything from you.

Actually, you should not buy the book. You said you read the first three chapters. So what is the discovery? Do you even know?

I read your first three chapters and I raised questions and you had nothing. We're not bothering to do that again.

I will help you keep your desperate little thread going because it will piss off some other charlatans though.

What questions did you raise? You just kept telling me that his proof of 'no free will' is nothing more than a tautology.

[peacegirl]

Age: you are, once more, making False claims in regards to me, which means, once more, that it is actually you who does not know what it is talking about.



Age: What was a so-called 'discovery' to "your" daddy is not necessarily a discovery to others. Some of 'us' already new 'that' anyway.

I agree that 'that' may well been 'a discovery' to "your" father, but so what?



Age: Consider that what you are presuming, and/or believing, here, is not even close to the Truth, then 'that' certainly does not, and could not, 'piss me off', as you call it.

In fact not a single word that you have presented, here, has 'pissed me off'.

Peacegirl: You want me to admit it's not a discovery. You said this may have been a so-called discovery to my father, but not necessarily to others. Discoveries don't work like that. If a discovery is true, it's true for everyone, regardless of who agrees with it or not.

you, once again, have missed the point.

What one may consider to be 'a discovery', to them, may well have already be known, to another.

So, 'a discovery' may well be 'true', but only in regards 'to some', and not necessarily in regards 'to all'.

One day you might come to realise, and/or discover, this True Fact.

Let me clarify again that in order for a discovery to be beneficial to humankind, it has to be understood by scientists who can then announce to the world that this knowledge is, in fact, genuine, where preparations can be made to transition to this new world. Unfortunately, this discovery remains in obscurity, so it cannot be applied on a global scale to create this paradigm shift from war and crime to one of peace and security for all.

[FlashDangerpants]

Actually, you should not buy the book. You said you read the first three chapters. So what is the discovery? Do you even know?

I read your first three chapters and I raised questions and you had nothing. We're not bothering to do that again.

I will help you keep your desperate little thread going because it will piss off some other charlatans though.

What questions did you raise? You just kept telling me that his proof of 'no free will' is nothing more than a tautology.

Not interested in spending actual time with your theory any more. You can talk to age for a while.