Philosophy Now Forum

Oh F OFF!

You can't keep throwing tantrums every time you're called out for talking out of your ass. This is not constructive behavior, young lady.

Actually, you could go with it. Whenever you meet a new poster, just tell him to fuck off immediately so you don't have to go through this whole thing every time where eventually you lose an argument or say something asinine, the new member calls you a moron and then you stomp off and start a thread to bash wokies in to get your anger out. This is all entirely unproductive and unbecoming of a philosopher. Are you a philosopher? Yes, you are, so start acting like one, missy.

"(a)blames the victim, (b)blames the system, (c)blames the judge. Blames everyone and everything (d)BUT himself."

Here I'll show you what i mean. Okay, so you can just dislike me because you think I'm a perv and I'd not be able to object to that. It's perfectly okay for you to do that.

But what you can't do, and therefore shouldn't try, is base your disliking of me on a, b, and c because we are not on the same page regarding what 'blame' means and entails.

Alright, now watch what happens to (d).

The only way you could blame a defendant charged with crimes he didn't commit in addition to crimes he did commit would be to argue that the defendant shouldn't trust the judicial system and should instead expect to be charged also with crimes he didn't commit.

But this can be pushed to absurd limits. A guy who was told about a murder his gang friend was getting ready to commit couldn't get to the phone fast enough to inform the police so he was charged with conspiracy to commit murder. When he complains to you about how badly he got screwed, do you tell him b and c? Or, that's what he gets for hanging around gangsters?

Think about how stupid this would be. A guy knows he could get hit by a stray bullet if he left his house. He leaves his house. Therefore, he has nobody to blame but himself when he gets hit by a stray bullet.

The lesson here is, regardless of what i did, it would make no sense to claim that i should have not done what I did on the pretext of knowing that if I did, i may be charged with a heinous number of felonies i didn't commit.

The reason why I should not have done what I did should never be 'because i don't trust the judicial system'.

If someone can't trust the judicial system, you've got much bigger problems on your hands than a few exhibitionists.

You need to start thinking bigger, homes. I have been to the underworld and back to let you know that god is dead, your government is nonsense, and that all civil contracts are null and void... and you're worried about a couple teenage hotties seeing the penii.

You need to get your shit together and get off level 1 already. How long you been at level 1 now?

I wouldn't have thought it required a 'philosophical debate'. I doubt if I would have mentioned it again if you didn't regularly bring up the subject and blame others for your predicament. If you don't want to appear as a classic case of a sexual predator then don't do those things. That's your doing, not mine.

I have thus far tried three different kinds of THCa flower since discovering it a month ago.

The Gorilla Glue has the highest percent of THCa, but it's grown outside (i was told) and doesn’t taste as good as the Upside Down Runts and the Black Cherry Gelato, which have lower percents of THCa.

At both shops, the Gorilla Glue is sold out and has been for weeks. It's the same price per gram as the lower percent kinds, but ten percent higher. Let this demonstrate to THCa flower marketers that consumers care less about taste and how pretty the buds are and more about how high they get you.

https://kaotic.com/video/71b91268_20241024045728_t

Unbelievable. All the fighter in the gray had to do was raise up and lean back and the other fighter would have fell right on her ass. Look at gray fighter's right leg positioned perfectly behind the other fighter's left leg. When she stands up and the fighter starts to fall backward, she's going to release her hair in a reflex to use her hands to soften her fall. Happens every time. What a shame. Such a good setup there at the end, and instead she botched it.

I dunno mates but I'm starting to think about this intelligent design stuff. Think about an immune system T-cell and what it does. It picks up a chemical scent, follows it like a dog, and then engulfs the assailant. That's not just some sequence of organism behavior that results from mere chemical conditions and laws. That's downright aggressive intelligent behavior that only police and sociopaths engage in. That T-cell doesn't like that intruder. He senses the danger, and he feels the contempt and the obligation to stop it. All this is complex, ethically motivated behavior, you guys. All the parts of the T-cell working together to power this noble soldier.

You're telling me this T-cell is just swimming around in the blood stream like a deadbeat dad and just attacks all these invaders by accident?

There's this bug - forget what it is - but it flies up underneath another bug in flight and lays its eggs on the underbelly of the bug.

Now, how many times in a million years do you suppose one of these bugs would lay its eggs on the wrong spot of the airborne bug and the eggs would die? Probably like every time, right?

But suppose many of them did succeed in that jet fighter barrel roll up underneath the flying bug to lay its eggs. Let's say a bunch of them pulled it off. What about their genes would mean their offspring would be more likely to pull that barrel roll off, much less know instinctively where to land? Something is going on here and it... well, it bugs me.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Fri Oct 25, 2024 2:32 am There's this bug - forget what it is - but it flies up underneath another bug in flight and lays its eggs on the underbelly of the bug.

Now, how many times in a million years do you suppose one of these bugs would lay its eggs on the wrong spot of the airborne bug and the eggs would die? Probably like every time, right?

But suppose many of them did succeed in that jet fighter barrel roll up underneath the flying bug to lay its eggs. Let's say a bunch of them pulled it off. What about their genes would mean their offspring would be more likely to pull that barrel roll off, much less know instinctively where to land? Something is going on here and it... well, it bugs me.

Was indicated that you're very well liked by the entities I know...was having some lunch and reading the above - I am beyond giving much of a flying rats arse wot atheists still think tho personally.

Before you start condescending and belittling me, I must point out that the reason these 'entities' like scallywags like us (although I'm a different type of scallywag) is that we never give up no matter what is thrown at us...we struggle on.

I've said it on the forum B4 that EM_PATH_Y is the most important word to comprehend in our struggle to comprehend others and their life choices, even when their choices cross our own path in very negative ways. We must forgive and move on.

What ever 'depths' you have been to, I would be surprised if they were anywhere near the fathoms i've been. But I digress.

Regarding your above posts, do yourself a favour and purchase a second hand oculus quest 2 (or Q3 if u got the dosh)...and enjoy some of David Attenborough's docos in VR. Last night I watched a spider that was as big as my bedroom (magnified to the point of seeing all it's eyes and hairs) ---well, this spider was convinced via some sort of trickery by another spider to return to the centre of its web (via the perp spider plucking the web in a certain way) --- both spiders are shown magnified as Attenborough's calm voice explains what is going on (to the best of what scientists have sussed about such matters) ---- so eventually the trickster spider goes for the kill, injects the victim with its poison and consumes the victim from the inside out, sucking it dry....

So last night I watched that and some vids underwater where a South African fella was feeding by hand Tiger Sharks\Bull sharks etc..many sorts, feeding them large fish heads to assist them to stock up before they head off on a long journey to their breeding grounds (they're endangered species apparently)

Also I watched this woman swimming with a pod of large dolphins and it was so beautiful I teared up. They accomadated her presence as she filmed you could see the dolphins which were much larger than her, were careful not to ...wots the word? - flip their flippers?...where she was within the pod (ya, cbf looking up the correct term)

* IF you haven't experienced this high-end VR remember the above 180\360deg videos you are not fixed at looking straight at the observation of the recording, you can pan around all angles - it's soooo reeeeeaaaaaalll.

This turned up yesterday, atto treats himself sometimes.

Well, I'm a good boy, I deserve nice things!



..guess whose going camping (4D New Moon), under the canopy of the Milky Way @ Wilpena Pound next year?

Juat as with Clayton Bigsby, we ask: how can this be happening. How can a black woman anchoring for Fox News sit in front of a camera and defend anglo-saxon supremacist Don T against another black woman who happens to be running for president. How could a person commit such mutiny.

You're reading too much into it, bro. That woman keeps her genuine feelings about Don T to herself and frankly doesn't care who becomes the president. What she cares about... what she thinks about when she's on the sofa in her beautiful, spacious, but specious condo is how she'll never find a better paying job if she ever finally decided to be true to herself, quit Fox and become a democrat.

There are many in the world like this. They follow opportunities that arise on the career path and end up going where the best money is. It's pretty simple, really.

Being a black female Trump supporter has got to be a pain in the ass, though. Like, who does she hang out with when she's not at work? She must have a little clique of petite-bourgeois black conservative friends.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:43 pm How can this be happening, you ask. How can a black woman anchoring for Fox News sit in front of a camera and defend anglo-saxon supremacist Don T against another black woman who happens to be running for president. How could a person commit such mutiny.

1. What evidence do you have to support the claim that Donald is an 'anglo-saxon supremacist' --- of course you are thereby suggesting he is in fact a white supremacist. EVIDENCE PLEASE.

2. Why are you so concerned about the colour of someone's skin? Are you in fact, a RACIST?

1. Give me a chance to plant a recording device in the Mar-a-Lago cigar room and I'll have your proof.

2. I'm only concerned with the color of my own skin, which, now that you mention it, is losing its tan now that summer is over. This means I won't be as sexy as I normally am for roughly six months.

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:58 pm 1. Give me a chance to plant a recording device in the Mar-a-Lago cigar room and I'll have your proof.

So you got sweet FA. Indeed, plant a recording device in anyone's private quarters and you will likely get some bulldust that suits (taken out of context).

promethean75 wrote: ↑Tue Oct 29, 2024 4:58 pm2. I'm only concerned with the color of my own skin, which, now that you mention it, is losing its tan now that summer is over. This means I won't be as sexy as I normally am for roughly six months.

Well, if I was bisexual you'd not be on my list as 'sexy'...no offence prom but you is not particularly good at the logic thang. How can you state you are only concerned with the colour of your own skin when you keep banging on about the colour of Trump's skin and the colour of Kamala's skin?

"Well, if I was bisexual you'd not be on my list as 'sexy'...no offence prom but you is not particularly good at the logic thang."

Okay, but you're equivocating 'sexy' with 'being good at logic', which means i still may be sexy if in some possible world there is a sexiness that includes the quality of being bad at logic. It's perfectly conceivable that there is such a world.

You would have to prove that in all possible worlds, 'being good at logic' is a necessary feature of all instances of sexiness in that particular world. Are you prepared to do this?