Re: What's stopping us from seeing the truth?
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:03 am
Measure is the flaw that stands in the Way.
=
=
at Canzookia.com
https://canzookia.com/
Perspective.MJA wrote:So then everything you hear is true and false depending on what?nameless wrote:"Ultimately 'lies' are True as they are subsets of Truth. Locally, with definitional limitations ('exclusivity' rather than the 'inclusivity' (Oneness) of the 'Set') there are 'falsehoods'."
'Independent' of what? Define, please, what you mean by "independent".Are we not independent observers?"The flaw of classical science is the assumption of empiricism, which has been refuted by quantum, as has the obsolete notion of the 'independent observer'."
Yeah, you can say that. I find 'laws' to be 'thoughts' (all 'meaning/laws' exists as 'thought'), some people perceive (not create!) 'lawful' thoughts, others thoughts of more cheese on the nachos.The only laws of nature are the ones created by independent observation right?"The Laws of Nature are not rules controlling the metamorphosis of what is, into what will be. They are descriptions of patterns that exist, all at once... " - Genius; the Life and Science of Richard Feynman
The quote refered to a synchronously existing universe, where all moments of existence exist Now! No before, no after (other than as 'thought/memory...), just one timeless 'Big Bang' of Now! of 'Self! Knowledge!But if there is no such thing then nature is truly lawless and free.
Yes, 'Planck' perceived the thoughts...Was Planck the observer?"All existence ('Self Knowledge') is one timeless Planck (almost 10^-43/sec; one billion trillion trillion trillionths of a second!) moment, Now!"
I think you should double check his measurements!
'Measure' is one feature of the Tao.Measure is the flaw that stands in the Way.
Yes, ok. I unnderstand. Like I have replied to Typists similar assertions: do you understand that I understand this?MJA wrote:"Or, perhaps you could enlighten us as to how or why 'others' are 'stopped' from seeing this Truth."
Enlightenment:
To lighten the load,
To uncover the truth
To see the light
To be the light
To be true
To be
You
=
Removing measure from you daily life will help you find you.
And once you find you, you find All!
One is All there truly IS.
There appears to be the assumption , that all one has to do is follow a few steps and we will be enlightened .lancek4 wrote:Yes, ok. I unnderstand. Like I have replied to Typists similar assertions: do you understand that I understand this?MJA wrote:"Or, perhaps you could enlighten us as to how or why 'others' are 'stopped' from seeing this Truth."
Enlightenment:
To lighten the load,
To uncover the truth
To see the light
To be the light
To be true
To be
You
=
Removing measure from you daily life will help you find you.
And once you find you, you find All!
One is All there truly IS.
If you do, can you tell me why it is others don't ?
MJA wrote:Measure is the flaw that stands in the Way.
You just measured! So your words are flawed and stand in the way.
=
Ok, I undertsnad 'your' truth is "the' truth, do you have a truth about why others can't see it?Godfree wrote:There appears to be the assumption , that all one has to do is follow a few steps and we will be enlightened .lancek4 wrote:Yes, ok. I unnderstand. Like I have replied to Typists similar assertions: do you understand that I understand this?MJA wrote:"Or, perhaps you could enlighten us as to how or why 'others' are 'stopped' from seeing this Truth."
Enlightenment:
To lighten the load,
To uncover the truth
To see the light
To be the light
To be true
To be
You
=
Removing measure from you daily life will help you find you.
And once you find you, you find All!
One is All there truly IS.
If you do, can you tell me why it is others don't ?
that we will then think like you , like your "truth" is the one and only truth ,
but my truth is the one and only truth ,
we can't have two opposing one and only truths ,
I'm a stubborn mule and will not be changing ,
nor will you by the sounds of things ,
truth wars , I find it easy to talk in vague non specific terms ,
it gets hard when asked for a specific ,
I can list my truths ,
There is no god , heaven or life after death ,
The universe is infinite , ie , there was no beginning ,
We are monkey , and evolved , some more than others ,,!!
So hit me with your best shot , are your truths the same as mine ,??
some claim multiple universes , are you claiming multiple realities ,
reality is an individual experience ,
however there is only one reality , one real world ,
to know that world is my aim ,
many seem happy to live in fantasy land ,??
but I can't , fantasy bores me , reality is what spins my wheels ..!!
Do you think that i just fell from the sky with all this crap? I can scientifically and philosophically support anything that i have to offer here.MJA wrote:If the number is not relevant than why is it relevent to you?
Ok, this is getting testy.MJA wrote:"Ok, I undertsnad 'your' truth is "the' truth, do you have a truth about why others can't see it?"
Some are stuck on Planck units and others on other theories and still others on faiths and beliefs. We are what we are taught, and sadly much of what is taught is untrue.
Isn't that sweet! Here I was trying to answer your questions, trying to 'help you understand'. Sharing and understanding one Perspective to share at a time seems most wise, otherwise it gets messy. It is not a competition.Once those packets of uncertainty be they waves or particles, theories or faiths, measurements or judgements of probability or fairness are removed from the equation, equality or truth, justice and freedom, is All that remains.
Hope this helps you understand.
So your speaking about The Truth 'out there'? This shortest measurable 'thing'? Huh? Wow. So what does this say of the people of tomorrow, if the soul has been measured? Its solved, is it not? Now I have an absolute dimension of my soul. What are the other dimentions? Is this what they'll talk about?..nameless.. wrote:Do you think that i just fell from the sky with all this crap? I can scientifically and philosophically support anything that i have to offer here.MJA wrote:If the number is not relevant than why is it relevent to you?
I skip to the 'punchline' and some freak out and some are open enough to question.
One point is that a Planck length is the size of a Perspective, a 'Soul', and a planck moment is a unit of Perception, a 'percept'. If you are still bent on 'correcting' some perceived misunderstanding, just link me to it.
Otherwise, 'nuff said.
http://library.thinkquest.org/C0126626/ ... iverse.htm
"...known as the Planck time, only 10-43/sec..."
http://www.enlightened-spirituality.org ... ality.html
"And let's ponder that initial inflationary period of the physical universe: the infinitesimal Planck moment, the tiniest moment in physics, 10-43 second—a ..."
It's all over the net.
'Nough said.