Philosophy Now Forum

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:32 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:28 am Yet, is has never been 'me' who has said nor claimed any thing like 'this'.

How do you know?

You being convinced is no proof.

If you believe there is proof, then will you, please, provide 'it'.

So, then 'I' can, and will, apologize.

Until you or another does, if you or another does, 'i' do not recall ever saying nor claiming any thing like 'that'.

So, will you provide some thing that proves I did say and/or claim 'that'? Or, will 'I' need to copy and paste every word of mine, showing otherwise?

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:33 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:29 am LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL
LOL

The pinnacle of maturity.

The acronym "LOL" repeated six times in a row.

How does one express 'the amount', without repeating 'it' so many times?

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:37 am I can believe he didn’t want to be seen with me in public, no problem.

But only I know the truth as to whether he wanted to be seen with me under the sheets. I know with absolute certainty that he definitely wanted to be seen with me under the sheet’s because it was the only place where we experienced the real fire that burnt us both to ash. It was like fire and fire. Indistinguishable. We couldn’t get enough of this fire. We both admitted that we’d never felt that sort of fire before. It was that hot, it totally consumed itself. It had to eventually short circuit. Boom!

That little dweeb? FFS. Is he Jason Momoa? You are insane.

Yes, Harbal was the one man that was ever able to remove every sense of sanity from my being. He drove me totally insane with pleasure.

You must have led a very sheltered life

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

I only give myself to the one who is capable of igniting the fire in me, until that happens, I’m totally uninterested in men or sex. So yeah, I guess I’ve lived a sheltered life, looking out purely for myself. I’m a hot blooded female. I follow only my own heart.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:35 am

Age wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:27 am If 'this one' really thinks or believes that 'I' am going to do absolutely any thing just because 'it' told me to do some thing, then the 'only one' this one is fooling and deceiving, here, is "its" own 'self'.

You don't have to do anything.

So, why then do you even bother 'trying to' tell me to?

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:35 am Feel free to be anything you want.

'Be' and 'do' are two completely different things.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:35 am But then, don't claim you're capable of answering questions.

I have expressly made it clear, in relation to what I say, write, and/or claim, here.

What a joke. Some one starts a thread, for example, ' Questions to "Magnus anderson" ', and then 'others' actually are stupid enough to think or believe that "magnus anderson" is under some sort of obligation to answer them.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:35 am You very clearly are not.

If 'this' is what you are 'now' presuming and believing is absolutely true, then, while you are believing 'this', then 'this' is, exactly, what you will 'see' and 'hear', here.

Magnus Anderson wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:35 am And that is probably why people don't like interacting with you. You lack the basic skills of communication.

LOL

So, 'this one' asked 'me',
What does the word "definition" mean?

To which I responded with 'an answer'.

However, 'this one' completely and utterly misinterpreted 'my answer' and took it 'so far out of context', then its own version and interpretation was not even what I said and wrote. And, 'this', without yet even mentioning that 'this one', then, laughingly 'tried to' claim,

'I am asking about the common definition though',

solely because 'I' had, in fact, already answered 'the question' that 'it' had 'asked me'. And, 'this one' did not like 'this' at all. For the obvious Fact that in 'my answer' showed and revealed the irony and absolute hypocrisy in what it has previously claimed.

LOL 'I' have already explained that the 'common definition' all depends on where, and when, the 'common definition' is in relation to, exactly. Of which 'this one' obviously never clarified anywhere, here.

But now, supposedly, people, probably, do not like interacting, 'with me', because;

1. 'I' am, supposedly, 'clearly not capable of just answering questions'. And/or,

2. 'I', supposedly and allegedly, 'lack the basic skills of communication'.

Which makes me wonder if 'this one' even knows why 'I' am even, here, in this forum.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am You must have led a very sheltered life

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

Some also wonder if it is 'ridiculous' to keep bringing up the perceived, and/or actual, sex between human beings in a 'philosophy forum' of all places.

Are there not enough other forums, on the world wide internet, for 'that talk'?

My, what a short memory you have Kenny.
Perhaps I will hound your girlfriend off the site, just as she has so many others

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

You’re the one who keeps digging up the dead, and talking about Harbal on this forum. I’m over him, but if you’re determined to dredge up the past about him, then I’ll oblige willingly to talk about him as he was actually somebody I used to know. Even now he’s just somebody that I used to know, thanks for the memories.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:08 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

You’re the one who keeps digging up the dead, and talking about Harbal on this forum. I’m over him, but if you’re determined to dredge up the past about him, then I’ll oblige willingly to talk about him as he was actually somebody I used to know. Even now he’s just somebody that I used to know, thanks for the memories.

And I'll keep doing it you demented old cow. Why don't you 'drive' your boring, insane self off the site since you are so good at driving others off it?

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am You must have led a very sheltered life

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

No woman talks like you do on a philosophy forum. Maybe you ought to take a leaf out of your own book.The story is never separated from the book.

The eyes of truth are always watching

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:13 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:08 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

You’re the one who keeps digging up the dead, and talking about Harbal on this forum. I’m over him, but if you’re determined to dredge up the past about him, then I’ll oblige willingly to talk about him as he was actually somebody I used to know. Even now he’s just somebody that I used to know, thanks for the memories.

And I'll keep doing it you demented old cow. Why don't you 'drive' your boring, insane self off the site since you are so good at driving others off it?

You can keep doing it until the cows come home for all I care. I’m already home.

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:14 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am You must have led a very sheltered life

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

No woman talks like you do on a philosophy forum. Maybe you ought to take a leaf out of your own book.The story is never separated from the book.

The eyes of truth are always watching

So profound.
The only times you have made any sense are when you've been venting your jealous rage, and showing your hatred for other women. You disgust me.

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:13 pm

Fairy wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 12:08 pm

accelafine wrote: ↑Sat Sep 20, 2025 11:49 am

No woman talks like that about a sexual partner. It's ridiculous.

You’re the one who keeps digging up the dead, and talking about Harbal on this forum. I’m over him, but if you’re determined to dredge up the past about him, then I’ll oblige willingly to talk about him as he was actually somebody I used to know. Even now he’s just somebody that I used to know, thanks for the memories.

And I'll keep doing it you demented old cow. Why don't you 'drive' your boring, insane self off the site since you are so good at driving others off it?

I’m not leaving, deal with it.