Page 9 of 11
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 8:57 pm
by Phil8659
Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:53 pm
Here...let me draw a one with one moevment....
.
"one" is more than one movement. You just lied. Secondly I never stopped you for doing what you claim you could do.
And Thirdly, your illiteracy is provable, because grammar has never been so that we could express thought, it is for the recursion of memory.
Part of the memory is the ability to recursively apply principles of grammar which you clearly cannot do.
Every system grammar is binary, a binary used to construct the definition of one, as a standard thing. Neither of you can even comply with the foundation of grammar. The very same foundation a computer has to use.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 8:58 pm
by Pistolero
Show me a 1, old fart.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 8:59 pm
by Phil8659
Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:58 pm
Show me a 1, old fart.
show you what? finish the sentence.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 8:59 pm
by Pistolero
Yes, moron languages are based on binaries.
1/0.
Show them to me....in the world.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:01 pm
by Phil8659
Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:59 pm
Yes, moron languages are based on binaries.
1/0.
Show them to me....in the world.
I am in the world, you are in the world, so what world are you referring to?
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:02 pm
by Atla
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:57 pm
Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:53 pm
Here...let me draw a one with one moevment....
.
"one" is more than one movement. You just lied. Secondly I never stopped you for doing what you claim you could do.
And Thirdly, your illiteracy is provable, because grammar has never been so that we could express thought, it is for the recursion of memory.
Part of the memory is the ability to recursively apply principles of grammar which you clearly cannot do.
Every system grammar is binary, a binary used to construct the definition of one, as a standard thing. Neither of you can even comply with the foundation of grammar. The very same foundation a computer has to use.
Word salad, and again you don't know how computers work. Your illiteracy is provable.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:04 pm
by Pistolero
My god, you are thick...and panicked.
Show me the one...a one....a singularity.
I am not going to waste more time on you, old fart.
You can't.
Know why?
It's in your head, and we all share the same way of conceptualizing fluid existence.
Based on our cellular cycles of systole/diastole.
Diastole = 1
Systole = 0
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:04 pm
by Phil8659
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:02 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:57 pm
Pistolero wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:53 pm
Here...let me draw a one with one moevment....
.
"one" is more than one movement. You just lied. Secondly I never stopped you for doing what you claim you could do.
And Thirdly, your illiteracy is provable, because grammar has never been so that we could express thought, it is for the recursion of memory.
Part of the memory is the ability to recursively apply principles of grammar which you clearly cannot do.
Every system grammar is binary, a binary used to construct the definition of one, as a standard thing. Neither of you can even comply with the foundation of grammar. The very same foundation a computer has to use.
Word salad, and again you don't know how computers work. Your illiteracy is provable.
I see, I am a licensed electronics technician who does not know electronics. I took my testing in another world. I got it. How did I get there?
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:05 pm
by Pistolero
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:01 pm
I am in the world, you are in the world, so what world are you referring to?
Wow!!
Dead...from the neck, up.
He's gone.
And now...I'm gone.
Ta, Ta,
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:06 pm
by Atla
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:04 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:02 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 8:57 pm
"one" is more than one movement. You just lied. Secondly I never stopped you for doing what you claim you could do.
And Thirdly, your illiteracy is provable, because grammar has never been so that we could express thought, it is for the recursion of memory.
Part of the memory is the ability to recursively apply principles of grammar which you clearly cannot do.
Every system grammar is binary, a binary used to construct the definition of one, as a standard thing. Neither of you can even comply with the foundation of grammar. The very same foundation a computer has to use.
Word salad, and again you don't know how computers work. Your illiteracy is provable.
I see, I am a licensed electronics technician who does not know electronics. I took my testing in another world. I got it. How did I get there?
If you were a licensed electronics technician, you would know how logic gates work. (Unless you're American or something.)
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:09 pm
by Phil8659
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:06 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:04 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:02 pm
Word salad, and again you don't know how computers work. Your illiteracy is provable.
I see, I am a licensed electronics technician who does not know electronics. I took my testing in another world. I got it. How did I get there?
If you were a licensed electronics technician, you would know how logic gates work. (Unless you're American or something.)
Then if you know, why do you contradict yourself claiming that they do not?
I draw logic gates in geometry and show everyone how to do it. You can make one with any equation.
how about you. My work is posted, I prove I can
Like I said, and as posted, I show how to draw interactive computers.
CAn you turn any equation into a logic gate? I can.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:11 pm
by Atla
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:09 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:06 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:04 pm
I see, I am a licensed electronics technician who does not know electronics. I took my testing in another world. I got it. How did I get there?
If you were a licensed electronics technician, you would know how logic gates work. (Unless you're American or something.)
Then if you know, why do you contradict yourself claiming that they do not?
I draw logic gates in geometry and show everyone how to do it. You can make one with any equation.
how about you. My work is posted, I prove I can
Like I said, and as posted, I show how to draw interactive computers.
You drew them in binary, which you think is the only possibility.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:12 pm
by Phil8659
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:11 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:09 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:06 pm
If you were a licensed electronics technician, you would know how logic gates work. (Unless you're American or something.)
Then if you know, why do you contradict yourself claiming that they do not?
I draw logic gates in geometry and show everyone how to do it. You can make one with any equation.
how about you. My work is posted, I prove I can
Like I said, and as posted, I show how to draw interactive computers.
You drew them in binary, which you think is the only possibility.
And have I not pleaded with you to show me that there is another way? and you refuse? like a cowardly liar.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:14 pm
by Atla
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:12 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:11 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:09 pm
Then if you know, why do you contradict yourself claiming that they do not?
I draw logic gates in geometry and show everyone how to do it. You can make one with any equation.
how about you. My work is posted, I prove I can
Like I said, and as posted, I show how to draw interactive computers.
You drew them in binary, which you think is the only possibility.
And have I not pleaded with you to show me that there is another way? and you refuse? like a cowardly liar.
After I already linked you the wiki page last time, because you were incapable of a basic google search or AI query? You cowardly, pathetic piece of shit liar.
Re: Equality
Posted: Thu May 01, 2025 9:16 pm
by Phil8659
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:14 pm
Phil8659 wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:12 pm
Atla wrote: ↑Thu May 01, 2025 9:11 pm
You drew them in binary, which you think is the only possibility.
And have I not pleaded with you to show me that there is another way? and you refuse? like a cowardly liar.
After I already linked you the wiki page last time, because you were incapable of a basic google search or AI query? You cowardly, pathetic piece of shit liar.
I did not ask you to give me a link to someone who parroted words they did not understand.
You said you knew, so prove it.
You are a simple minded parrot, you cannot even think your way out of a paper bag.
You Parrot, bark like a dog.
prove your words. YOU Prove them.
Show me how you can even draw 1 using only one part of speech in its most abstract form, the motion of your own hand.
OH but I gave you a link to another idiot, That is not backing up your own words.