Re: Schrodinger's Cat Thought Experiment
Posted: Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:17 pm
For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Yes, true, but I do not think that his unhappiness equates to a sense of reality.
Don't worry, ever since I have been on the forum posting evidence it appears to be just for hysteria.
There was a sequence of tacticson his part: condescension, insults, telling people to shut up, dismissing their right to speak on a subject, then a kind of gentler condescension calling people Child or Children. This is bumping up against reality and finding that these kinds of tactics may not be effective.
I have seen some of his videos, but I'm not particularly fond of him, and I don't know what the many worlds hypothesis is.attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:25 pm
But on this one of his (A brief history of quantum mechanics) - he surprised me that he believes in the 'many worlds' hypothesis - (which is bollocks)
Mate, he gives a very good example at the beginning of the video.Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:52 pmI have seen some of his videos, but I'm not particularly fond of him, and I don't know what the many worlds hypothesis is.attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:25 pm
But on this one of his (A brief history of quantum mechanics) - he surprised me that he believes in the 'many worlds' hypothesis - (which is bollocks)
He came here to sell something. Ostensibly his ideas, but really himself, and when it turned out that nobody was buying, he became petulant. I don't think there is much more to it than that.Iwannaplato wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:26 pm
It's very hard to judge people's emotional states through words on the screen, but I don't think it went like expected and I don't think he enjoyed what happened. But, yeah, it comes down to having a sense of this.
I only have a 30 second attention span.attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:58 pm
Mate, he gives a very good example at the beginning of the video.
...when it gets down to 5 seconds even dipshits from the ILP forum like iambioguous will be able to take a swipe - but don't worry (I think once your attention span gets under 3 you die pretty quickly)Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 5:03 pmI only have a 30 second attention span.attofishpi wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:58 pm
Mate, he gives a very good example at the beginning of the video.![]()
No one is claiming they know except as a concept known by the only knowing there is which is consciousness.Age wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 2:19 pmTherefore, the human being known as "dontaskme" 'knows nothing' or 'never knows anything'. Which further means that absolutely EVERY thing "dontaskme" says and claims is NOT known AND can NOT be proven true.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 5:18 pmYou don't do anything, you are being done.henry quirk wrote: ↑Wed Aug 31, 2022 5:11 pm
Since I am quite happilyALIVE
why would I do such a terminally retarded thing?
You cannot tell yourself you are dead, so what makes you think you know you are alive?
Except as concept known...and the point is - that which is known can know nothing.
Thank you for the honesty. It is very refreshing.
VERY, VERY True.Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 4:11 pmIt sounds like we might think along similar lines here, but I won't take that for granted, as I might not have understood you properly. Like everyone else here, I do think about the nature of existence and "reality" in relation to myself as an existing entity, but, unlike many, I haven't come to any firm conclusions. Perhaps that's because I can settle for, "I don't know", more than some people can. Anyway, in all my thinking, I haven't come up against any need to think in terms of duality or non-duality. It seems to me that once you start adopting terms like that, and feeling that you have to stay within them, you are placing constraints on yourself that limit your thinking.The mistake a so-called "dualist" makes is the EXACT SAME mistake the so-called "nondualist" makes. That is; thinking or believing that there could actually be such things as "dualists" and "nondualists", in Life.
There ARE these 'things' known as human bodies, with, obviously, different thoughts within. But there is NO actual 'thing', which could be a "dualist" nor "nondualist" only.
Well to me anyway.
Again, VERY, VERY True.
We are in absolute agreement about this, Age. I hate it when people try to pin some kind of "ist" on me.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvLKIv0uaQ4Is there a link to this video?
'We' have gone through this many times already.Dontaskme wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 7:26 pmNo one is claiming they know except as a concept known by the only knowing there is which is consciousness.
It’s not a “ someone “ who knows; a “ someone “ is known. You are the knowing that cannot be known. You are the absolute.
Two things here.
So, to "dontaskme", ALL of 'you', human beings, that is; the named ones who claim to know things are 'the Knowers' and 'the KNOWING, which, laughably, are also claimed to be UNKNOWABLE.
One would have thought that the Fact that it is an absolute impossibility to do so, accurately, would have stopped people from even 'trying to' do it, but sadly this is not the case.
Thank you.Harbal wrote: ↑Fri Sep 02, 2022 9:43 pmhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvLKIv0uaQ4Is there a link to this video?