Page 9 of 17
Re: "Should country folk be denied education because your ideology?"
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:23 pm
by commonsense
RCSaunders wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 3:19 pm
Shaw was right, "
Those who can, do; those who can't, teach."
Shaw has got it wrong. Those who can, do; those who believe others can, teach.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:29 pm
by Skepdick
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:16 pm
Not shared if every individual wants to produce wealth for only himself or only himself and his family.
Every individual wants to produce wealth for only himself and only his family!
That still sounds like every individual wants the same thing.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm
by commonsense
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:15 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:09 pm
Take the risk and opt out, or huddle in perceived safety by remaining in.
The safety isn't perceived - it's actual.
Doctors, sanitation, electricity, reliable source of food.
The price you pay for all of those comforts is all the responsibilities it comes with.
Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:36 pm
by Skepdick
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm
Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Yeah. Everybody wants real X for free...
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:43 pm
by commonsense
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:36 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm
Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Yeah. Everybody wants real X for free...
Yup.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:09 pm
by henry quirk
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:43 pm
Skepdick wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:36 pm
commonsense wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 5:30 pm
Yes, the safety is real. I was referring to the idea that if real safety isn’t seen as real safety, the huddles would not have so much reason to huddle.
Yeah. Everybody wants real X for free...
Yup.
nope
some of us wanna pay a fair price...we go out of our way to do that
free shit (not really
free...somebody is payn' for it, in some fashion) is a goddamned leash
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:33 pm
by Skepdick
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 6:09 pm
nope
some of us wanna pay a fair price...we go out of our way to do that
free shit (not really
free...somebody is payn' for it, in some fashion) is a goddamned leash
What would you say is a fair price for drinkable water?
The point is that somebody has to do the work. Part of politics is about who should bear the cost and how to collect on the bill.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:14 pm
by henry quirk
What would you say is a fair price for drinkable water?
I can get a 16 oz bottle of nestle's water for 86 cents
seems fair to me
I pay about $50 monthly for water service, for two
seems fair to me
The point is that somebody has to do the work.
yeah, that's what I said
Part of politics is about who should bear the cost and how to collect on the bill.
no
all of politics is schmucks lookin' to make a dime on taxpayers
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 9:49 am
by Belinda
henry quirk wrote: ↑Sun Aug 23, 2020 7:14 pm
What would you say is a fair price for drinkable water?
I can get a 16 oz bottle of nestle's water for 86 cents
seems fair to me
I pay about $50 monthly for water service, for two
seems fair to me
The point is that somebody has to do the work.
yeah, that's what I said
Part of politics is about who should bear the cost and how to collect on the bill.
no
all of politics is schmucks lookin' to make a dime on taxpayers
Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:16 pm
by henry quirk
Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.
oh, I get it, I do
some folks need direction; some folks need to direct
you understand some folks want & need neither, yeah?
you confuse glibness & cleverness for honesty & intelligence
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:19 pm
by Belinda
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:16 pm
Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.
oh, I get it, I do
some folks need direction; some folks need to direct
you understand some folks want & need neither, yeah?
you confuse glibness & cleverness for honesty & intelligence
I have done so and hope I have learned to do better than that.
Certainly I understand some folks want liberty I want it for myself. But I can't have unlimited liberty as there are other people besides me to be considered if only because I need their goods and services.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:24 pm
by henry quirk
Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:19 pm
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:16 pm
Like it or not we have to be governed by rule of law and to my mind politicians are better than kings or war lords. The thing is to try to inform myself which politicians are honest and intelligent and which are not, and vote accordingly.
oh, I get it, I do
some folks need direction; some folks need to direct
you understand some folks want & need neither, yeah?
you confuse glibness & cleverness for honesty & intelligence
I have done so and hope I have learned to do better than that.
Certainly I understand some folks want liberty I want it for myself. But I can't have
unlimited liberty as there are other people besides me to be considered if only because I need their goods and services.
no such animal
bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
now,
license & libertinism : that's what you get when folks ignore the self-responsibility part
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:34 pm
by Belinda
bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
Was it Hobbes or was it Rousseau who claimed just that? I cannot remember.
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:36 pm
by henry quirk
Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:34 pm
bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
Was it Hobbes or was it Rousseau who claimed just that? I cannot remember.
hell if I know
Re: the proper balance between idealism and pragmatism
Posted: Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:48 pm
by Belinda
henry quirk wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:36 pm
Belinda wrote: ↑Mon Aug 24, 2020 1:34 pm
bein' free is man's natural state, to self-direct & be self-responsible
Was it Hobbes or was it Rousseau who claimed just that? I cannot remember.
hell if I know
I did not expect you to know. I hoped you might do some googling for me.