For the discussion of all things philosophical.
https://canzookia.com/
Ivory tower philosophy, think your way to the truth, complete bullocks.Obvious Leo wrote:I got kicked out of a physics forum for claiming that an observation is an act of cognition, doc, but I'm on very safe ground in a philosophy forum. No philosopher worthy of the name would make such a basic error as to confuse Noumenal with Phenomenal reality.
I was able to make free from the shit of the mankind - that is the difference ! You all are incredibly far from !Obvious Leo wrote:Presumably you don't define your own bullshit as nonsense so obviously you are not of the mankind. What species of being are you?manden wrote:The mankind made and makes nonsense
How did you manage to achieve this remarkable feat?manden wrote:I was able to make free from the shit of the mankind
Out of the shit into the sewer, where it is dark.manden wrote:I was able to make free from the shit of the mankind - that is the difference ! You all are incredibly far from !Obvious Leo wrote:Presumably you don't define your own bullshit as nonsense so obviously you are not of the mankind. What species of being are you?manden wrote:The mankind made and makes nonsense
Hard work , till now 11 years .Obvious Leo wrote:How did you manage to achieve this remarkable feat?manden wrote:I was able to make free from the shit of the mankind
You'd have done better to work on your grammar skills.manden wrote:Hard work , till now 11 years .Obvious Leo wrote:How did you manage to achieve this remarkable feat?manden wrote:I was able to make free from the shit of the mankind
Hi Manden,manden wrote:logic means that all has a cause ! Grasp it or let it . In a kindergarten they understand more !
By your definition vibrations in the air require someone to perceive them to be a sound, by that definition we can extend that to say that only the vibrations that impinge on an ear are a sound and all the other vibrations that travel off in other directions are not sounds even though they all have the same source.Obvious Leo wrote:Vibrations in the air are not sound, just as molecules in the air are not smells. It requires an observer with an information processing network before such raw data can be said to have a meaning. This is not only mainstream philosophy but it is also mainstream neuroscience.
But you are presupposing that there is a God and that there is a "superior logic". How do you know that there is a God and that there is "superior logic"?manden wrote:All has a cause is human logic . About an unimaginable superior logic ( that of the creator) we can say nothing !
There is no reason to expect that God or the Universe will conform to human logic.manden wrote:All has a cause is human logic . About an unimaginable superior logic ( that of the creator) we can say nothing !
It might be possible to assert that God's logic is different than human logic, but there is no evidence that it is superior.manden wrote:All has a cause is human logic . About an unimaginable superior logic ( that of the creator) we can say nothing !
I have recognized the existence of the real creator of the universe at his creation .Gary Childress wrote:But you are presupposing that there is a God and that there is a "superior logic". How do you know that there is a God and that there is "superior logic"?manden wrote:All has a cause is human logic . About an unimaginable superior logic ( that of the creator) we can say nothing !
If you wish to say that "all has a cause", then God must also have a cause. If you wish to say that God does not have a cause then you must believe that at least one (God) does not have a cause.
Think about it ! You also have a brain .thedoc wrote:It might be possible to assert that God's logic is different than human logic, but there is no evidence that it is superior.manden wrote:All has a cause is human logic . About an unimaginable superior logic ( that of the creator) we can say nothing !
How do you recognize the real creator of the universe at his creation? My understanding is that you believe there is a God because you think "all must have a cause". But you actually don't believe all must have a cause. You believe that at least one (God) does not have a cause. If God does not have a cause, then it must NOT be the case that "all has a cause". You've invalidated your own reason for believing in God.manden wrote:I have recognized the existence of the real creator of the universe at his creation .Gary Childress wrote:But you are presupposing that there is a God and that there is a "superior logic". How do you know that there is a God and that there is "superior logic"?manden wrote:All has a cause is human logic . About an unimaginable superior logic ( that of the creator) we can say nothing !
If you wish to say that "all has a cause", then God must also have a cause. If you wish to say that God does not have a cause then you must believe that at least one (God) does not have a cause.